Nankang NS-2R

Author
Discussion

6speedmanual

Original Poster:

133 posts

229 months

Friday 7th November 2014
quotequote all
Hi

Anyone tried these on a Caterham yet?

http://www.nankangtyre.co.uk/performance/motorspor...

Would be interested in feedback and discussion.

P

Gingerbread Man

9,171 posts

213 months

Friday 7th November 2014
quotequote all
No 205x13" for me. Look decent though.

admaraujo

62 posts

112 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
6speedmanual said:
Hi

Anyone tried these on a Caterham yet?

http://www.nankangtyre.co.uk/performance/motorspor...

Would be interested in feedback and discussion.

P
Same here... Would love to know actual opinions from people who used them...

I read somewhere that they have a tread depth of 7mm when new.

Also would like to know to what the 180 compound compares to.

Edited by admaraujo on Thursday 29th January 18:06

mono fraud

62 posts

112 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
I am afraid to say mine only lasted 2500 B-road miles...

Edited by mono fraud on Monday 13th February 12:13

6speedmanual

Original Poster:

133 posts

229 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
About the same mileage as CR500, then.

mono fraud

62 posts

112 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
6speedmanual said:
About the same mileage as CR500, then.
Really!!!! I hear of 4000 to 6000 miles on CR500... Never had them myself but, I was pondering on ZZS, for being the "heir" of the CR500.

Do people tend to lie that much?!

Edited by mono fraud on Monday 13th February 17:36

sjmmarsh

551 posts

220 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
I get 5,000 from a set of CR500s on the rear and 10,000 from the fronts. That includes about 500 track miles plus half a dozen sprints - which means 30 burnouts to tyre warm.

What are you guys doing to your tyres??

6speedmanual

Original Poster:

133 posts

229 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
7mm (new) to 2mm on rears (205) in 2100 miles of Alpine passes in R400 K series.
Just a function of working them hard.
Pretty sure, judging by some group blats that many have driving styles which would give more.
Also mostly in UK fewer opportunities for intensive working, except maybe Scotland.

6speedmanual

Original Poster:

133 posts

229 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Anyway, aside from wear, what comment on grip (dry/wet), feel, turn-in, steering kick-back, ride, noise, etc?
+/- analysis v CR500 / ZZR / Toyo888 ?

My tyre choice for my 7 would have mileage fairly near bottom of selection criteria.
The other aspects are more important, explaining why after 500 miles on ZZR I took them off and returned to CR500.

Peter

shrink1061

102 posts

91 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
yes but even if mileage isn't taken into account and you look at it on a price per mile the avon's still score higher.

E.g. £57 for one tyre that lasts 2000 miles or £90 for a tyre that lasts 5000+

The ZZR and ZZS perform superbly and are IMHO the very best tyres for a caterham (where ride height and clearances allow the 55 profile).

ZZS ideal for mostly road use with occasional track, ZZR better for mostly track use.

mono fraud

62 posts

112 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
So ZZS and ZZR are 7mm tread depth when new, like CR500 were? I read 5.5mm when new...

I agree with shrink1061. Price per mile seems a lot better on Avon's than the Nankang's, which begs the questions: If more expensive tyres like, ZZR, ZZS, A048R, or crazy Michelin TB5 (talking 13" only), usually do more miles, aren't these NS-2R, false economy? And if yes, why so popular? Plain price? Lack of experience with other tyres? Hype?

shrink1061

102 posts

91 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
I think just price yeah. I think many people don't realise the wear rate is quite bad and just see cheap.

Also some users have very specific reasons for wanting the extra ride height. 185/60/13 is a bit taller than 185/55/13 (about 11mm of extra clearance I believe). When you have a sump 6-7cm off the ground, the extra profile comes in handy.

I myself had considered the Nankangs because i only do around 2000 miles a year in the caterham, and could use a little extra ground clearance on my wet sump K series.

I'd prefer ZZS but a tad concerned about how low they will make the car.

mono fraud

62 posts

112 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
shrink1061 said:
I think just price yeah. I think many people don't realise the wear rate is quite bad and just see cheap.

Also some users have very specific reasons for wanting the extra ride height. 185/60/13 is a bit taller than 185/55/13 (about 11mm of extra clearance I believe). When you have a sump 6-7cm off the ground, the extra profile comes in handy.

I myself had considered the Nankangs because i only do around 2000 miles a year in the caterham, and could use a little extra ground clearance on my wet sump K series.

I'd prefer ZZS but a tad concerned about how low they will make the car.
Coke can time?