£20m loss

Author
Discussion

dptdpt

Original Poster:

100 posts

164 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
See Caterham reported a £20 million loss due to the failed Renault venture. Anyone have any views on what this means to the future of the company?

framerateuk

2,733 posts

184 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
I would say it means they need to stick to what they good at - building and updating the 7 and not get too many delusions of being able to compete in other markets.

Renault can afford to lose 20m on a research project, Caterham cannot.

Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
Every single attempt Caterham makes to start a non-7 car ends in tears.

Smollet

10,568 posts

190 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
I think the sooner Caterham is owned by an enthusiastic realist rather than a businessman intent on ruling the world the better

apexcone

138 posts

138 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
Smollet said:
I think the sooner Caterham is owned by an enthusiastic realist rather than a businessman intent on ruling the world the better
Agree, laughlaughlaugh

apexcone

138 posts

138 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
Its more than lightly a paper loss, I just bet there is a plethora of small companies that never got paid.

apexcone

138 posts

138 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
framerateuk said:
I would say it means they need to stick to what they good at - building and updating the 7 and not get too many delusions of being able to compete in other markets.
I wholeheartedly agree with this comment. The difficulty is holding in balance growth, technical innovation and understanding your market. Its already been stated that any attempt that CC has made to produce another model has failed miserably, so one can only conclude that maybe CC are seeking to answer questions that people aren't asking. eek Long live the 7

coppice

8,607 posts

144 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
Better to establish the facts before speculating that people have not been paid . Is there any evidence at all that people haven't been paid ?

dptdpt

Original Poster:

100 posts

164 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
There is no suggestion whatsoever that their creditors are unpaid. It was reported in the Sunday Times yesterday that the company reported a £20m loss, £16m of which was due to writing off development costs after the Renault deal stopped. The parent company, Caterham Enterprises, provided loans which were converted into equity.

lawtoma

110 posts

193 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
http://skiddmark.com/2015/04/caterham-rebuilds-for...
Sounds more positive - especially given their last article on how to destroy a brand!

framerateuk

2,733 posts

184 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
lawtoma said:
http://skiddmark.com/2015/04/caterham-rebuilds-for...
Sounds more positive - especially given their last article on how to destroy a brand!
Good article. They seem to be on the right track. Seems someone has managed to keep Fernandez in check, but I still fear for the company while he's in charge.

BertBert

19,039 posts

211 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
It's a really interesting business as it has a great product that through ckever iterations of the basic design can be made to appeal to lots of different markets.

The problem is to make money for an owner. It was perfect as a lifestyle business for the Nearns. But times change.

Fernandes wants to sell it. Someone who buys it is unlikely to want to run it as a life style business. So it has to have a grand plan.

It has always tried to come up with new models as I assume the scaling of production, supply, sales and support of the 7 has so far been impossible. It's too small to be a global supplier of an expensive to manufacture car.

So can't diversify, can't scale, can't be a lifestyle business, can't have a grand plan for a new owner.

Looks like a three pipe problem.

Bert

apexcone

138 posts

138 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
coppice said:
Better to establish the facts before speculating that people have not been paid . Is there any evidence at all that people haven't been paid ?
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/how-caterham-f1-collapsed/

BertBert

19,039 posts

211 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
But am I right in thinking that Caterham sports was sold to cojocar so the losses there (41m eeek) are outside the Caterham group and are in addition to the 20m reported for the Caterham group?

scottracing

35 posts

125 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
reading between the lines, big tony has caterham up for sale which im not entirely surprised about. If you look on his twitter page he rarely mentions caterham but its all about QPR and Air Asia.
I just hope that caterham dont rest on there laurels and build a proper future seven, just look at how much gineta have grown and the new potential with the LMP3 car. But this is down to having the cash and spending it properly.


apexcone

138 posts

138 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
I think CC needs someone with a long term vision, Ansar (Corvan) were involved to turn there investment into profit, good on them, Ansars a great guy, but I think as been said CC needs a life style owner.

BertBert

19,039 posts

211 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
scottracing said:
just look at how much gineta have grown and the new potential with the LMP3 car. But this is down to having the cash and spending it properly.
I can't convince myself that Ginetta are in any way a role model here. They sell no road cars to speak of, but have some good racing models although with fairly limited numbers. The P3 project shows all the signs of being as difficult as it could be and I don't think it will change Ginetta's fortunes.

Caterham are really good at creating and selling one car. A race car for the road and a road car for racing. They are unable to do anything else as time has shown, but they are very good at what they are good at. Their problem is scaling what they do. They need to find a way of making 800, then 1000, then 1200 cars (specifically Sevens) per year with the absolute minimum geographical coverage.

But I suspect the difficulty is finding a new owner. Tony will want a daftly high price and the investment case for an independent new owner won't stack up without global domination.

So that leaves it to a (so-called) strategic purchaser. Someone who has good presence and distribution who can pay the right price to put the "assets" of Caterham (I don't mean that in a bad way) to good use.

So if Porsche had a mind to be in that part of the market, they could buy Caterham. They certainly know how to build cars in scale, have strong distribution and a massive pedigree in road-cars for racing. Perfect. Except it would be meaningless to them so they wouldn't.

Could you put Radical and Caterham together? Perhaps. There are some synergies. Perhaps their two racing ladders could be moulded into one cohesive one. Radical have road car aspirations, so Caterham's experience there helps. There's nothing obvious that helps on scalability, both suffer from the hand-made car problem.

I'd buy Caterham!

Bert

Bert

coppice

8,607 posts

144 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
apexcone said:

Link doesn't work ; but surely the point is that as I understand it Caterham F1 was always a separate entity (hence it being for sale)and I assume that the Renault project JV was Caterham themselves? They might have set up a separate company for the JV of course. Is there evidence that suppliers have not been paid or is it mere speculation ?

apexcone

138 posts

138 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
Link works fine here eek

BertBert

19,039 posts

211 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
coppice said:

Link doesn't work ; but surely the point is that as I understand it Caterham F1 was always a separate entity (hence it being for sale)and I assume that the Renault project JV was Caterham themselves? They might have set up a separate company for the JV of course. Is there evidence that suppliers have not been paid or is it mere speculation ?
Caterham F1 became part of the Caterham Group that TF set up when (after) he bought Caterham cars.