Duratec v k series

Duratec v k series

Author
Discussion

Esceptico

Original Poster:

7,469 posts

109 months

Sunday 14th February 2016
quotequote all
Apologies if this topic has been done to death....

Thinking of getting a SL/SLR/R300/R400. Hoping to try a few next week when I visit a dealer.

What is the general consensus on the former K Series engines versus the newer Duratec powered cars? Worth paying a bit extra for the newer cars (with the new engine)?

adsvx220

705 posts

183 months

Sunday 14th February 2016
quotequote all
Age old argument this. It depends what you are after?? Older cars k series newer duratec.

K series:

Revvier
Light
Older
Very tuneable with £££'s
Once tuned the engine turns into a screeming banshee even my subtly tuned 1800 k with cams, head work and throttle bodies the car sounded awesome and that had a limit of 7250rpm with 170bhp god know what 250bhp with 9000rpm is like. Bonkers I'd imagine.

Ignore the k series aren't reliable gang. If the engine is looked after and warmed up properly they are fine. My car had 26000miles with track use by previous owner and me redlining it through its lifetime I never had a problem.

Duratec

Very slightly heavier
Torquier
Lazier engine
Newer
Very tuneable for less £££'s I believe

It's personal choice I personally wanted a k but I would probably enjoy a duratec just as much. In fact my next 7 will probably be a duratec in R500 flavour.

Esceptico

Original Poster:

7,469 posts

109 months

Sunday 14th February 2016
quotequote all
^^^^

Thanks for that.

coppice

8,610 posts

144 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
I have owned both and the K has character in spades- revs like crazy, sounds like a racing car and really suits a Seven. The Duratec sounds ho hum (unless you put on roller barrels , which transform it in every way ) , pulls like a diesel but revs freely and by all accounts is bulletproof. But I never had a problem in 40k plus of K usage so don't believe all that old tut about them having HGF every 5 miles or so. So..duratec for me if you get RBTB - otherwise a K .

Esceptico

Original Poster:

7,469 posts

109 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
In what way does the roller barrels transform the Duratec? Noise? Character?

BertBert

19,039 posts

211 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
I'm a big k-series fan, but it would be daft to ignore the fact that they have HG weaknesses. I've been through a few. I also don't think that they will necessarily be ok if "looked after and warmed up properly". But if they are well put together, they can be fine.

As to which one prefers, I can't comment as I only have k-series experience! That's a poor state of affairs isn't it??

Bert

coppice

8,610 posts

144 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Esceptico said:
In what way does the roller barrels transform the Duratec? Noise? Character?
Both -the noise is amazing - feral induction noise and a wealth of pops and farts on overrun. But the response is the real thing ; the difference is extraordinary . Some say it costs a lot for ten bhp. I say it feels like at least three times that. Others say it drinks fuel with rbtbs - no it doesn't , it behaves as any other Seven will. Frugal if pootling ,dipso if hammering.

forest07

669 posts

205 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
coppice said:
I have owned both and the K has character in spades- revs like crazy, sounds like a racing car and really suits a Seven. The Duratec sounds ho hum (unless you put on roller barrels , which transform it in every way ) , pulls like a diesel but revs freely and by all accounts is bulletproof. But I never had a problem in 40k plus of K usage so don't believe all that old tut about them having HGF every 5 miles or so. So..duratec for me if you get RBTB - otherwise a K .

The other option is Jenvey throttle bodies, I ran the direct to head ones, on my Duratec and I believe they don't drop out of balance as often as the roller barrels.

andy97

4,703 posts

222 months

Monday 21st March 2016
quotequote all
coppice said:
I have owned both and the K has character in spades- revs like crazy, sounds like a racing car and really suits a Seven. The Duratec sounds ho hum (unless you put on roller barrels , which transform it in every way ) , pulls like a diesel but revs freely and by all accounts is bulletproof. But I never had a problem in 40k plus of K usage so don't believe all that old tut about them having HGF every 5 miles or so. So..duratec for me if you get RBTB - otherwise a K .
Not sure about the Duratec being bulletproof. Don't know much about the Caterham installation but in the MX5 mk3 (same engine) they are known to be very sensitive to oil level and if they are not absolutely at the full mark all of the time can suffer damage.

As an aside, what are the Vauxhall XE variants like in comparison?

culminator

576 posts

209 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2016
quotequote all
I've just returned to a VX XE after a Duratec R500, via a BDR. Strangely, the R500 didn't actually feel massively quick. It was of course but the engine felt a bit, err, dully,really. Can't explain why, it was on RBTB but just didn't excite. It didn't seem to want to rev...

The XE I now have is tuned to about 225bhp and whilst it's early days, it just seems a monster. Total linear power, great noise and bags of low down grunt but also very willing to rev. In a word, love it. (Ok two words!)

Skyedriver

17,855 posts

282 months

Wednesday 23rd March 2016
quotequote all
Crossflow..........................

Shropcat

78 posts

161 months

Friday 25th March 2016
quotequote all
Having now had both a 230bhp K Series and a 260bhp Duratec I have come to the conclusion that the visceral screaming nature of the K far surpasses the 'lazy' big torquey power of the Duratec. Saying that a 2000 mile tour of Europe would be in the Duratec every time.

FST

42 posts

102 months

Friday 25th March 2016
quotequote all
Have just got back from a fabulous day at Cadwell with my Freestyle Duratec car (2.3l), previously (albeit briefly) owned by Culminator! Everything has now been properly set up and the car is massively quick and responsive. Last time I was at Cadwell I was in my 200bhp K series SLR - which was certainly more revvy and frantic, but the torque of the Duratec is amazing - it just pulls and pulls and rewards tidy driving with very quick lap times. I was there with another Freestyle car, Paul Hazell's, a 215hp car just remapped to 240, and we both agree there's nothing much that can touch these cars once correctly set up.


andy97

4,703 posts

222 months

Saturday 26th March 2016
quotequote all
Who was it that is supposed to have said, "torque wins races"?

sllimr

33 posts

257 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
Having just switched my old R400 K for an R500 D, I'd say they were both great in their own way, the Duratec is more usable on the road as it hunts about less and power is more usable, K was more "raw" at the the top end of the revs and more pronounced "coming on cam" but the Duratec still going into banzai mode as it hits its stride.

Loved them both (and my old VX which I believe was purchased from the previous VX exponent on this thread....), prefer the character of the Duratec myself but depends on how you like your engines IMO.