RE: Charity Caterham Weigh-In

RE: Charity Caterham Weigh-In

Author
Discussion

CypherP

4,387 posts

193 months

Wednesday 15th October 2008
quotequote all
Thats 'flat-floor' LordBenny, not Flat Four. Its not a scoob weigh-in smile

Antj

1,049 posts

201 months

Wednesday 15th October 2008
quotequote all
Paperboy said:
To all those who are taking the p*ss, envy is a terrible thing.

It's not just the outright weight it will also be adjusting the set-up to improve handling hwich I thought PH'ers would understand? Guess you're all Saxo drivers?
blimey, it hough drivng kit-car-esque cars you'd have a sense of humour obviously not.

Also comments about saxo's great mate, its exactly that snobbishness from those who spend loads on a sportcar that makes it more satisfying spanking them round the track. You see just because they are sportcars does'nt mean you can drive em. In fact everytime i'm at the ring the cars you tend to get holding the race line at 50mph are bloody middle aged caterham drivers. Works both ways does'nt it.

Oh and i don't drive a Saxo, i have a 206 and Mini. but i do appreciate good cars.

Also if you want competitions on the weight front, paya visit to the Ranualt Turbo owners club. there are guys on there in Renault 5 Turbo's down to the high 500k's on weight now

joz8968

Original Poster:

1,042 posts

211 months

Wednesday 15th October 2008
quotequote all
Lordbenny said:
What does 'flat-four' mean?
...Lots of misery for Impreza owners e.g. me! hehe

You mean 'flat-floor', you <ahem> benny?...... I don't know, lol.

Edited by joz8968 on Wednesday 15th October 17:33

Mafioso

2,349 posts

215 months

Wednesday 15th October 2008
quotequote all
Antj said:
Paperboy said:
To all those who are taking the p*ss, envy is a terrible thing.

It's not just the outright weight it will also be adjusting the set-up to improve handling hwich I thought PH'ers would understand? Guess you're all Saxo drivers?
blimey, it hough drivng kit-car-esque cars you'd have a sense of humour obviously not.

Also comments about saxo's great mate, its exactly that snobbishness from those who spend loads on a sportcar that makes it more satisfying spanking them round the track. You see just because they are sportcars does'nt mean you can drive em. In fact everytime i'm at the ring the cars you tend to get holding the race line at 50mph are bloody middle aged caterham drivers. Works both ways does'nt it.

Oh and i don't drive a Saxo, i have a 206 and Mini. but i do appreciate good cars.

Also if you want competitions on the weight front, paya visit to the Ranualt Turbo owners club. there are guys on there in Renault 5 Turbo's down to the high 500k's on weight now
I have to say that that sounded very insecure...

Noger

7,117 posts

250 months

Wednesday 15th October 2008
quotequote all
Boring to weigh a BMW 3-series perhaps, NOT boring to weigh (and flatfloor, which is a good thing) a Caterham. Power to weight is everything, and with such a low weight you can make a big difference with quite small gains (carbon fibre tax disk holder anyone smile ). High 500s is one thing, but the lightest Caterhams weigh less than 400.

Plus lack of weight must = more Carbon Fibre. And Carbonphillia is an affliction ! Just bought some Carbon rear wings from RiF - gorgeous.

Although clearly the real point is to laugh at VX owners and say "boat anchor" a lot biggrin

Paperboy

118 posts

253 months

Wednesday 15th October 2008
quotequote all
You're a cruel man Noger smile I have a boat anchor in mine smile

georgel

29 posts

208 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
Paperboy said:
To all those who are taking the p*ss, en vy is a terrible thing.

It's not just the outright weight it will also be adjusting the set-up to improve handling hwich I thought PH'ers would understand? Guess you're all Saxo drivers?
Ha ha, I have got one somewhere acutally. I would be quite interested to see what it weighs. Can I come along? Or are some of the fat V8s worried they might be heavier? biggrin

Edited by georgel on Thursday 16th October 08:59

general190

252 posts

204 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
Paperboy said:
general190 said:
And if they were saxo drives, doesnt that fit in with the caterham ethos?
Couldn't be further from it my friend.

Edited by Paperboy on Wednesday 15th October 15:26
Why? the lotus 7 was designed to be a) light b) fast c) cheep d) fun

the saxo VTS is a) v.light for a modern(ish) hatch @ 965kg b) fast 120bhp, 0-60 in 7.2 seconds c) cheep at £12,000 for a hatch which can keep up with much faster cars eg mini cooper s, civic type R etc. and d) fun, which they are, which is why they are a hot hatch legend! i have driven a few (never owned but with the economy going the way it is it would be fun, quick and cheep to run) and they are fun! such a giggle goin onto 3wheels when cornering hard then oversteer if you lift of! gret fun, fast, light, great handeling little cars!

HAVE YOU EVER DRIVEN A VTS? (NOT A VTR)

Some people realy need to lighten up!

lol! just realised thats the WHOLE point of the event!

stripy7

806 posts

188 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
Just ignore it, boring aggresive/snobbish/elitist remark.

MarchHare

345 posts

206 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
Just on the subject of weighing your Caterham (or any other car that has adjustable ride heights)this is something you should definitely do. The point is not to see what the car weighs but rather what the relative weights on the wheels are. The aim is to equalise left and right front weights whilst simultaneously adjusting rake (i.e. relative ride heights front to rear)and optimising cross weights (diagonal weight).

As you might expect this can be quite complex as adjusting the ride height on one shock has a knock on effect on every other weight and height. Similarly changing camber and rake will have a significant impact on corner weights.

The whole point of it is to get the car (and driver)to behave in a predictable and similar manner for both left and right hand corners and to brake in a straight line. A car with unequal weights over the front wheels will be more unpredictable.

You might think all this is only relevent for race cars but it's possible to get quite close quite quickly with a set of corner weight scales and a bit of twiddling and most people will notice a positive difference in the handling afterwards.

fergus

6,430 posts

276 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
MarchHare said:
Just on the subject of weighing your Caterham (or any other car that has adjustable ride heights)this is something you should definitely do. The point is not to see what the car weighs but rather what the relative weights on the wheels are. The aim is to equalise left and right front weights whilst simultaneously adjusting rake (i.e. relative ride heights front to rear)and optimising cross weights (diagonal weight).

As you might expect this can be quite complex as adjusting the ride height on one shock has a knock on effect on every other weight and height. Similarly changing camber and rake will have a significant impact on corner weights.

The whole point of it is to get the car (and driver)to behave in a predictable and similar manner for both left and right hand corners and to brake in a straight line. A car with unequal weights over the front wheels will be more unpredictable.

You might think all this is only relevent for race cars but it's possible to get quite close quite quickly with a set of corner weight scales and a bit of twiddling and most people will notice a positive difference in the handling afterwards.
How does camber effect corner weights?

Is Gary in the 'balance the front wheels' or 'balance the diagonals' camp?

Is the day just to see what your car weighs or to use Gary to adjust optimally whilst you're there?

matt frost

783 posts

252 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
stripy7 said:
Just ignore it, boring aggresive/snobbish/elitist remark.
Are you honestly trying to justify a comparison between a Saxo VTS and a Caterham? Wow.

Saxo VTS - hot hatch legend - LOL. Sure they are pretty fun and cheap, but with the same driver they won't get near the proper hot hatches. Don't start comparing them to Caterhams and Westfields though. Kit cars/Lotus 7's/Caterhams/these sorts of Track orientated cars are incomparable to anything else.

general190 said:
Paperboy said:
general190 said:
And if they were saxo drives, doesnt that fit in with the caterham ethos?
Couldn't be further from it my friend.

Edited by Paperboy on Wednesday 15th October 15:26
Why? the lotus 7 was designed to be a) light b) fast c) cheep d) fun

the saxo VTS is a) v.light for a modern(ish) hatch @ 965kg b) fast 120bhp, 0-60 in 7.2 seconds
Yeah, twice as heavy as a Caterham, not far off half the power of most typical Caterhams, and double the 0-60 time. Radio, windows, 5 seats, a boot, a roof....very similar.

You are right in the way that they both have the same aim, in a way, but they are very different and stand for very different things. VTS's are fairly middle level mildly warm hatches and Caterhams are basically ultimate performance, fun, feeling, experience, sensation, result.


Edited by matt frost on Thursday 16th October 14:56

Paperboy

118 posts

253 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
Yeah, what he ^ said tongue out

stripy7

806 posts

188 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
"Are you honestly trying to justify a comparison between a Saxo VTS and a Caterham? Wow."

No Im not- I just didnt like his initial disparaging remark.



(Im bored and want a fight)

Edited by stripy7 on Thursday 16th October 17:29

M400 NBL

3,529 posts

213 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
It's a pity there isn't a rolling road too, but from what I briefly read, a flat floor setup will be very useful for those that track their 7's.

Plus like minded people can get together to discuss ways of beating Saxo's smile

BertBert

19,072 posts

212 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
matt frost said:
a lot of stuff...
and Caterhams are basically ultimate performance, fun, feeling, experience, sensation, result.
Er no I'm afraid not. Caterhams used to be the trackday secret weapon 10 years ago, but we've moved on since then.

Bert

BertBert

19,072 posts

212 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
MarchHare said:
stuff and
The point is not to see what the car weighs
Oh yes it is. Pure unadulterated weight envy biggrin
Bert

sam919

1,078 posts

197 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
BertBert said:
matt frost said:
a lot of stuff...
and Caterhams are basically ultimate performance, fun, feeling, experience, sensation, result.
Er no I'm afraid not. Caterhams used to be the trackday secret weapon 10 years ago, but we've moved on since then.

Bert
whats the trackday secret weapon now then that offer the above stated by matt frost

fergus

6,430 posts

276 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
sam919 said:
BertBert said:
matt frost said:
a lot of stuff...
and Caterhams are basically ultimate performance, fun, feeling, experience, sensation, result.
Er no I'm afraid not. Caterhams used to be the trackday secret weapon 10 years ago, but we've moved on since then.

Bert
whats the trackday secret weapon now then that offer the above stated by matt frost
radicals and cars with more sophisticated suspension and in some cases aero....

Although I own a Caterham I fully acknowledge that it's a very crude, dated bit of kit, albeit a lot of fun and still pretty quick, although as Bert says, there are quicker things out there. But, bang for your buck, I think they're not bad!

sam919

1,078 posts

197 months

Friday 17th October 2008
quotequote all
Yes they are the same sort of design as 50 odd years ago, but there has been some slight development.
The radical is a different piece of kit altogether, and in many cases not allowed in club level sports and saloon championships.
Ultimatly you can get a monposto for the same price as a radical.......but thats like putting a caterham agasint a radical!!