One game for life?
Discussion
Polarbert said:
Tricky one. Honestly for me I would say Battlefield 4. I had all the maps and spent many hours on there. If it still had the player base I would still be playing. Some of the maps were incredible like the wake island one, but there just arent the people playing it anymore.
It's pretty sure, but a pale imitation of BF2.Johnnytheboy said:
I'd say exactly the opposite - if you want one game for life, you don't want to be relying on the vagaries of other players.
I think you are confusing Open World with MMORPG. I wasn't referring to online mutiplayer games, I was referring to open world single player games like Fallout4 and Skyrim. Which is why I mentioned Fallout4 and Skyrim. 
Patrick Bateman said:
Football Manager
Purely from the point of view that it has the addiction factor to sustain heavy interest, albeit in phases that come and go. No game I've ever played comes close on the hours spent.
Great Shout.Purely from the point of view that it has the addiction factor to sustain heavy interest, albeit in phases that come and go. No game I've ever played comes close on the hours spent.
My Milwall game has "clicked" again and I can't put the bloody thing down
Tough call; I could maybe narrow it down to a couple, then it would be a random choice.
Rimworld - Hugely addictive, difficult, loads of content and multiple ways to play it. If it had onine co-op (drop in and out style), it would be my perfect game. It is still only in alpha as well!
Eve Online - I played it for a few months, but when I finally grasped how hugely complex it was and the amount of hours I'd need to put in just to become 'average', I gave up. One game for life? You could sink thousands of hours into this and still not make it into the top tier.
Skyrim - Not sure I could survive without playing this ever again. Huge game, loads of options and customisation. Played 6 or 7 new games over the years and rarely follow the same path twice (aside from the main story).
Rimworld - Hugely addictive, difficult, loads of content and multiple ways to play it. If it had onine co-op (drop in and out style), it would be my perfect game. It is still only in alpha as well!
Eve Online - I played it for a few months, but when I finally grasped how hugely complex it was and the amount of hours I'd need to put in just to become 'average', I gave up. One game for life? You could sink thousands of hours into this and still not make it into the top tier.
Skyrim - Not sure I could survive without playing this ever again. Huge game, loads of options and customisation. Played 6 or 7 new games over the years and rarely follow the same path twice (aside from the main story).
ClockworkCupcake said:
Johnnytheboy said:
I'd say exactly the opposite - if you want one game for life, you don't want to be relying on the vagaries of other players.
I think you are confusing Open World with MMORPG. I wasn't referring to online mutiplayer games, I was referring to open world single player games like Fallout4 and Skyrim. Which is why I mentioned Fallout4 and Skyrim. 
Gassing Station | Video Games | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff