Dji Phantom UAVs

Author
Discussion

No Bend

591 posts

123 months

Monday 5th October 2015
quotequote all
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.

Emeye

9,773 posts

224 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
No Bend said:
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.
The rules are being developed as they go along as it is in its infancy, if the UAV is below 7kg and you are qualified there is an amendment that does allow you within 50m of buildings not under your control if it is safe to do so. The wording used is "within a congested area". If I wanted to fly around a busy industrial estate during the day that would be frowned upon - at 8 on a saturday morning I should be OK.

With all these things, if you use common sense all should be fine. Unfortunately there are always people who don't care and think they know better and will give Drone flyers a bad name - when I have been flying I have not had one person complain - anyone who comes along will ignore it or they are really interested and want to know about it.

andrewrob

2,913 posts

191 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Emeye said:
No Bend said:
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.
The rules are being developed as they go along as it is in its infancy, if the UAV is below 7kg and you are qualified there is an amendment that does allow you within 50m of buildings not under your control if it is safe to do so. The wording used is "within a congested area". If I wanted to fly around a busy industrial estate during the day that would be frowned upon - at 8 on a saturday morning I should be OK.

With all these things, if you use common sense all should be fine. Unfortunately there are always people who don't care and think they know better and will give Drone flyers a bad name - when I have been flying I have not had one person complain - anyone who comes along will ignore it or they are really interested and want to know about it.
No if its under 7kg its still 50m, the difference between 0-7 and 7-20 is that 7-20 can't be within 150m of a congested area whereas a sub 7kg can be 50m.

The operator near V8 andy's sister's place could have been operating legally if he had a CAOSC approved for a much smaller distance, although that does sound very close.

Emeye

9,773 posts

224 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
andrewrob said:
Emeye said:
No Bend said:
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.
The rules are being developed as they go along as it is in its infancy, if the UAV is below 7kg and you are qualified there is an amendment that does allow you within 50m of buildings not under your control if it is safe to do so. The wording used is "within a congested area". If I wanted to fly around a busy industrial estate during the day that would be frowned upon - at 8 on a saturday morning I should be OK.

With all these things, if you use common sense all should be fine. Unfortunately there are always people who don't care and think they know better and will give Drone flyers a bad name - when I have been flying I have not had one person complain - anyone who comes along will ignore it or they are really interested and want to know about it.
No if its under 7kg its still 50m, the difference between 0-7 and 7-20 is that 7-20 can't be within 150m of a congested area whereas a sub 7kg can be 50m.

The operator near V8 andy's sister's place could have been operating legally if he had a CAOSC approved for a much smaller distance, although that does sound very close.
I am trying to get clarification, but I had been told there was an amendment not yet in the CAP 722 for exemption for buildings within 50 meters. For example if you are photographing the roof of a house on a housing estate, there are going to be other houses within 50m. The information could be wrong though as I have not seen the document.

andrewrob

2,913 posts

191 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Emeye said:
andrewrob said:
Emeye said:
No Bend said:
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.
The rules are being developed as they go along as it is in its infancy, if the UAV is below 7kg and you are qualified there is an amendment that does allow you within 50m of buildings not under your control if it is safe to do so. The wording used is "within a congested area". If I wanted to fly around a busy industrial estate during the day that would be frowned upon - at 8 on a saturday morning I should be OK.

With all these things, if you use common sense all should be fine. Unfortunately there are always people who don't care and think they know better and will give Drone flyers a bad name - when I have been flying I have not had one person complain - anyone who comes along will ignore it or they are really interested and want to know about it.
No if its under 7kg its still 50m, the difference between 0-7 and 7-20 is that 7-20 can't be within 150m of a congested area whereas a sub 7kg can be 50m.

The operator near V8 andy's sister's place could have been operating legally if he had a CAOSC approved for a much smaller distance, although that does sound very close.
I am trying to get clarification, but I had been told there was an amendment not yet in the CAP 722 for exemption for buildings within 50 meters. For example if you are photographing the roof of a house on a housing estate, there are going to be other houses within 50m. The information could be wrong though as I have not seen the document.
Ah I think what you are referring to is the CAOSC, so basically when the revision came out it meant that you could apply for reduced distances by putting forward a safety case. So if I wanted to photograph houses but with other houses 20m away I could put a case forward requesting a distance of 20m rather than 50m. Usually you do this by saying you'll not move laterally by more than a few metres (rather than the usual 500) and maybe not go higher than 100ft (rather than 400ft) and then any other safety procedures to reduce risk.

The other thing that's worth noting is that the 50m in congested areas for the sub 7kg only comes in once you have your permission for aerial work before that its still 150m.
Also worth remembering that you can't overfly people, buildings, or vehicles outside of your control at any height too.
Hope that makes sense, I'm not always the best at explaining stuff!

Emeye

9,773 posts

224 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
andrewrob said:
Emeye said:
andrewrob said:
Emeye said:
No Bend said:
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.
The rules are being developed as they go along as it is in its infancy, if the UAV is below 7kg and you are qualified there is an amendment that does allow you within 50m of buildings not under your control if it is safe to do so. The wording used is "within a congested area". If I wanted to fly around a busy industrial estate during the day that would be frowned upon - at 8 on a saturday morning I should be OK.

With all these things, if you use common sense all should be fine. Unfortunately there are always people who don't care and think they know better and will give Drone flyers a bad name - when I have been flying I have not had one person complain - anyone who comes along will ignore it or they are really interested and want to know about it.
No if its under 7kg its still 50m, the difference between 0-7 and 7-20 is that 7-20 can't be within 150m of a congested area whereas a sub 7kg can be 50m.

The operator near V8 andy's sister's place could have been operating legally if he had a CAOSC approved for a much smaller distance, although that does sound very close.
I am trying to get clarification, but I had been told there was an amendment not yet in the CAP 722 for exemption for buildings within 50 meters. For example if you are photographing the roof of a house on a housing estate, there are going to be other houses within 50m. The information could be wrong though as I have not seen the document.
Ah I think what you are referring to is the CAOSC, so basically when the revision came out it meant that you could apply for reduced distances by putting forward a safety case. So if I wanted to photograph houses but with other houses 20m away I could put a case forward requesting a distance of 20m rather than 50m. Usually you do this by saying you'll not move laterally by more than a few metres (rather than the usual 500) and maybe not go higher than 100ft (rather than 400ft) and then any other safety procedures to reduce risk.

The other thing that's worth noting is that the 50m in congested areas for the sub 7kg only comes in once you have your permission for aerial work before that its still 150m.
Also worth remembering that you can't overfly people, buildings, or vehicles outside of your control at any height too.
Hope that makes sense, I'm not always the best at explaining stuff!
Yes you are correct and explained it much better than me! - I spoke to my instructor at Resource Group today - you have to submit a Volume 3 safety assessment. He has no idea how long would take to come back from the CAA though as he had never needed to apply for one.....

The definition of a congested area is also a bit vague, and an area that is classed as congested at a certain time of the day could possibly be classed as not congested at another time of the day. i.e. Industrial estate at 9am on a weekday til 8pm in a congested area, but at 6am Sunday morning if all the businesses are shut it would not be a congested area.

Do you have your Permission for Aerial Work?

andrewrob

2,913 posts

191 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
Emeye said:
andrewrob said:
Emeye said:
andrewrob said:
Emeye said:
No Bend said:
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.
The rules are being developed as they go along as it is in its infancy, if the UAV is below 7kg and you are qualified there is an amendment that does allow you within 50m of buildings not under your control if it is safe to do so. The wording used is "within a congested area". If I wanted to fly around a busy industrial estate during the day that would be frowned upon - at 8 on a saturday morning I should be OK.

With all these things, if you use common sense all should be fine. Unfortunately there are always people who don't care and think they know better and will give Drone flyers a bad name - when I have been flying I have not had one person complain - anyone who comes along will ignore it or they are really interested and want to know about it.
No if its under 7kg its still 50m, the difference between 0-7 and 7-20 is that 7-20 can't be within 150m of a congested area whereas a sub 7kg can be 50m.

The operator near V8 andy's sister's place could have been operating legally if he had a CAOSC approved for a much smaller distance, although that does sound very close.
I am trying to get clarification, but I had been told there was an amendment not yet in the CAP 722 for exemption for buildings within 50 meters. For example if you are photographing the roof of a house on a housing estate, there are going to be other houses within 50m. The information could be wrong though as I have not seen the document.
Ah I think what you are referring to is the CAOSC, so basically when the revision came out it meant that you could apply for reduced distances by putting forward a safety case. So if I wanted to photograph houses but with other houses 20m away I could put a case forward requesting a distance of 20m rather than 50m. Usually you do this by saying you'll not move laterally by more than a few metres (rather than the usual 500) and maybe not go higher than 100ft (rather than 400ft) and then any other safety procedures to reduce risk.

The other thing that's worth noting is that the 50m in congested areas for the sub 7kg only comes in once you have your permission for aerial work before that its still 150m.
Also worth remembering that you can't overfly people, buildings, or vehicles outside of your control at any height too.
Hope that makes sense, I'm not always the best at explaining stuff!
Yes you are correct and explained it much better than me! - I spoke to my instructor at Resource Group today - you have to submit a Volume 3 safety assessment. He has no idea how long would take to come back from the CAA though as he had never needed to apply for one.....

The definition of a congested area is also a bit vague, and an area that is classed as congested at a certain time of the day could possibly be classed as not congested at another time of the day. i.e. Industrial estate at 9am on a weekday til 8pm in a congested area, but at 6am Sunday morning if all the businesses are shut it would not be a congested area.

Do you have your Permission for Aerial Work?
Yeah I started out with a friend (or at least was then) about 5 years ago, when we registered we were only number 196! Now I'm somewhere around 1000 (partnership broke down so started up from scratch on my own).

There's certainly a lot more people doing it now but there's still plenty of business around.

One reason I built a sub 7kg one was so the whole congested area thing was never an issue, for me its 50m regardless, unless its a crowd of over 1000 then I'm at 150m. There's one company that submitted a CAOSC and got approved at something like 10m from crowds of over 1000!

leggly

1,787 posts

212 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
I passed the Ground School exam today, well chuffed.thumbup

andrewrob

2,913 posts

191 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
leggly said:
I passed the Ground School exam today, well chuffed.thumbup
Congrats!

V8A*ndy

3,695 posts

192 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
leggly said:
I passed the Ground School exam today, well chuffed.thumbup
Well done beer


Thanks for the replies on this chaps much appreciated. I really want to do this but it's more from the hobby side of things as I've already stated I've a bit of a disability.

Another question discussion point.

What is the proper definition of a congested area and what about night flying?

A recent BBC programme House of Cars featured lots of boring drone footage and although it was filmed over private ground it was certainly filmed very close to one of the busiest roads, shopping and industrial areas in Belfast.

Also they filmed at night. Can this be done with special permission?






V8A*ndy

3,695 posts

192 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
No Bend said:
V8A*ndy said:
My sister lives in a very remote area and the BBC had a drone doing some filming. It was around ten feet from her house and about eight feet of the ground (there is a small clearing beside her house that they used for take off and landing).

She complained and the operator told her that as he was qualified he was able to fly so close and it was all above board.

he went a bit sheepish when she told him "my brother flys them and my brother says the law is 50 meters.".


In addition she could have said, "My husband has a 12 gauge…"

If it was so remote why were they so close to her house? Talk of a shot gun would have given him good incentive to fly elsewhere.
They were so close to her house as it's mostly cliff sides, a narrow road then water. Sisters house sits on the front beside a very small beech with Seals.

A small clearing beside the house is perfect. I've used it myself.




andrewrob

2,913 posts

191 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
V8A*ndy said:
leggly said:
I passed the Ground School exam today, well chuffed.thumbup
Well done beer


Thanks for the replies on this chaps much appreciated. I really want to do this but it's more from the hobby side of things as I've already stated I've a bit of a disability.

Another question discussion point.

What is the proper definition of a congested area and what about night flying?

A recent BBC programme House of Cars featured lots of boring drone footage and although it was filmed over private ground it was certainly filmed very close to one of the busiest roads, shopping and industrial areas in Belfast.

Also they filmed at night. Can this be done with special permission?





Here's the official CAA take on congested area
"The Air Navigation Order defines a congested area as being 'any area of a city, town or settlement which is substantially used for residential, industrial, commercial or recreational purposes' Permission must be obtained from the CAA to land or operate within a congested area."

But if you're under 7kg like I said above its 50m regardless so you never really have to worry about that. *ETA Its 150m until you get your permission for aerial work even if under 7kg*
You may find that the company doing the BBC filming have applied for a COASC and reduced the 50m down to something a lot more manageable, or spoken to all of the building owners/people (a bit trickier).

Night flying is another request to the CAA, from what I've heard you're unlikely to get it in your first year of having a licence anyway, and am unsure weather its worth bothering depending what you normally film.

With a normal PFAW you're allowed to film half an hour before sunrise and half an hour after sunset from memory, or maybe they use the wording dawn and dusk, but you get the idea.
For night flying safety case you have to have a white strobe on your drone, and then other things to reduce risk like maybe flying 200m radius rather than 500, and even having a big torch to illuminate the drone if your lights fail, or illuminate the landing area.

leggly

1,787 posts

212 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
andrewrob said:
leggly said:
I passed the Ground School exam today, well chuffed.thumbup
Congrats!
Thanks biggrin

leggly

1,787 posts

212 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
V8A*ndy said:
leggly said:
I passed the Ground School exam today, well chuffed.thumbup
Well done beer


Thanks for the replies on this chaps much appreciated. I really want to do this but it's more from the hobby side of things as I've already stated I've a bit of a disability.

Another question discussion point.

What is the proper definition of a congested area and what about night flying?

A recent BBC programme House of Cars featured lots of boring drone footage and although it was filmed over private ground it was certainly filmed very close to one of the busiest roads, shopping and industrial areas in Belfast.

Also they filmed at night. Can this be done with special permission?





Thanks biggrin

jimbouk

430 posts

195 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
Leggly

Congratulations on passing the exam, I'm probably looking to go down the official route soon.

I see you are in Gloucestershire, as am I, may I ask where you did you training / exam?

Seems to be a choice of two local providers, one at Kemble airfield and one at Bristol...


leggly

1,787 posts

212 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
jimbouk said:
Leggly

Congratulations on passing the exam, I'm probably looking to go down the official route soon.

I see you are in Gloucestershire, as am I, may I ask where you did you training / exam?

Seems to be a choice of two local providers, one at Kemble airfield and one at Bristol...
I'm doing it through the Resource Group. The ground school was in Southampton near Leamington Spa. The flying will hopefully be done near Kemble. smile

GetCarter

29,393 posts

280 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
leggly said:
I'm doing it through the Resource Group. The ground school was in Southampton near Leamington Spa. The flying will hopefully be done near Kemble. smile
Southampton is near Leamington? yikeswink

leggly

1,787 posts

212 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
leggly said:
I'm doing it through the Resource Group. The ground school was in Southampton near Leamington Spa. The flying will hopefully be done near Kemble. smile
Southampton is near Leamington? yikeswink
Bloody iPads and predictive text biggrin Southam sorry thumbup

GetCarter

29,393 posts

280 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
leggly said:
Bloody iPads and predictive text biggrin Southam sorry thumbup
I thought... bloody hell... his drone has some range!

leggly

1,787 posts

212 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
leggly said:
Bloody iPads and predictive text biggrin Southam sorry thumbup
I thought... bloody hell... his drone has some range!
My bionic contact lenses are on order to keep up with it. jester