Tell me about the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5X Macro Lens ....

Tell me about the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5X Macro Lens ....

Author
Discussion

Ireland

Original Poster:

3,516 posts

215 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
I'm thinking of getting a macro lens and the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5X has been suggested by one of the lads in the local camera club

He doesn't have one, nor does anyone else in the club or anyone I know, so it's nit as if I can borrow one to try it.

Have any of you got one?

What's your opinion on it?

This is it ...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-MP-E-65mm-Macro-Came...

DibblyDobbler

11,273 posts

198 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
I've got one smile

Hmm - where to start... It's like the evil genius of macro lenses. It can do things no other lens can do (ie 5x magnification) but it's a swine to use. No auto focus (no manual focus for that matter!), no zoom, no stabilisation, nothing. The focus distances are very small - ie you need to be within a few inches of the subject which can be tricky if it's a twitchy insect. Not a great idea if you are new to macro I would suggest, it's only for the committed geek biggrin

Oh and you'll need a flash - not really going to work without one.

If you get it working you can get stuff like this though so it's worth it smile

Bluebottle Macro by Dibbly Dobbler, on Flickr

DibblyDobbler

11,273 posts

198 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
Oh and there's a macro thread on here where a few MPE users hang out smile

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

DIW35

4,145 posts

201 months

Sunday 25th January 2015
quotequote all
My understanding is that particular macro lens can only be used for macro, as it doesn't have the focussing range to be used for more 'normal' photography. Personally I would opt for one of the 100mm macro lenses as they are easier to use, but can also be used as a normal lens if you find that macro photography isn't really your thing once you've tried it.

DibblyDobbler

11,273 posts

198 months

Sunday 25th January 2015
quotequote all
DIW35 said:
My understanding is that particular macro lens can only be used for macro, as it doesn't have the focussing range to be used for more 'normal' photography. Personally I would opt for one of the 100mm macro lenses as they are easier to use, but can also be used as a normal lens if you find that macro photography isn't really your thing once you've tried it.
Yes you're right - max focus distance is around 5 inches iirc so useless for anything other than macro (and close range macro at that!)

Ed_P

701 posts

270 months

Sunday 25th January 2015
quotequote all
It's horses for courses really. When you're after the ultra-small (these springtails are around 1.5mm), there not much to touch it for convenience and usability.

We are family ... by Ed Phillips 01, on Flickr

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Sunday 25th January 2015
quotequote all
You dont even get focus confirmation.

Its like the royalty of macro lenses though. To get more magnification you are into serious DIY territory!

As said, no focus, no zoom, needs light, but amazing results. Usually available on the used market too.

55palfers

5,911 posts

165 months

Monday 26th January 2015
quotequote all
For a fraction of the price, could you not buy a bellows and use any of your current lenses?

Used to do this in the old days of 35mm film

Might be a good way to master the technicalities of lighting and DoF

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nicna-Macro-Lens-Bellow-Ca...


StuH

2,557 posts

274 months

Monday 26th January 2015
quotequote all
My mint 100mm USM 'L' macro is up for sale wink

DibblyDobbler

11,273 posts

198 months

Sunday 8th February 2015
quotequote all
tumbleweed

...err you're welcome? rolleyes