Polarizing filter

Author
Discussion

DarkMatter

Original Poster:

1,473 posts

231 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
The recent UV filter thread, which several people advised against the use of such filters, has prompted me to ask the following.

Back in the pre-digital age I used a polarizing filter to give the fluffy white cloud effect and to reduce reflections from glass and water. Do people still use these filters with their digital cameras or are there camera/computer software tricks to give the same effect?

Thx.

Tony1963

4,758 posts

162 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
I haven't used filters for about five years now. My 70-200mm L lens is about 7 years old and the glass is in top condition, mainly thanks to the substantial hood. I take all my photos in Raw, so I mess with them for a few minutes anyway, and yes, I'll 'improve' the sky if necessary. However, good lenses tend to give better colours and skies anyway.

JSS 911

1,815 posts

211 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
DarkMatter said:
The recent UV filter thread, which several people advised against the use of such filters, has prompted me to ask the following.

Back in the pre-digital age I used a polarizing filter to give the fluffy white cloud effect and to reduce reflections from glass and water. Do people still use these filters with their digital cameras or are there camera/computer software tricks to give the same effect?

Thx.
I would say the polarizing filter is the only one you do really need.

GetCarter

29,377 posts

279 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
JSS 911 said:
I would say the polarizing filter is the only one you do really need.
+1 Post processing will help skies, but can't do much if you want to see the seabed!


Simpo Two

85,417 posts

265 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
JSS 911 said:
I would say the polarizing filter is the only one you do really need.
Yes, and perhaps an ND if you want to get creative. Everything else can be done in Photoshop etc.

Note that you need a circular polariser (CP or CPol) not linear as that can interfere with AF systems.

Digitalize

2,850 posts

135 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
Other than NDs for certain reasons, a Polariser is pretty much the only filter actually worth having.

Tony1963

4,758 posts

162 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
Hands up, I'll admit I had the two threads jumbled up in my head. I agree with the posts above!

Sam All

3,101 posts

101 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
Digitalize said:
Other than NDs for certain reasons, a Polariser is pretty much the only filter actually worth having.
Use the Polariser the most.

nellyleelephant

2,705 posts

234 months

Saturday 21st May 2016
quotequote all
Does anyone use a drop in polarizer with a telephoto lens for wildlife photography?

Trying to justify the silly cost (Canon) and I'm struggling.

rwstokes

196 posts

144 months

Monday 23rd May 2016
quotequote all
I use the Hoya Pro 1 circular polarising filter on my 100-400 for pretty much everything motorsport based now. I took it off for Zolder a few weeks back and was staggered by the difference in the colours, and how much more post processing I had to do the get the photos looking how I wanted.

So not used on for wildlife specifically, but on a Canon telephoto with no bother.

nellyleelephant

2,705 posts

234 months

Monday 23rd May 2016
quotequote all
rwstokes said:
I use the Hoya Pro 1 circular polarising filter on my 100-400 for pretty much everything motorsport based now. I took it off for Zolder a few weeks back and was staggered by the difference in the colours, and how much more post processing I had to do the get the photos looking how I wanted.

So not used on for wildlife specifically, but on a Canon telephoto with no bother.
Unfortunately, I think (as far as I'm aware) that I have to use the Canon drop in filter as I have no thread on the front of the lens.....it'd be a flipping big filter if there was....

Digitalize

2,850 posts

135 months

Monday 23rd May 2016
quotequote all
Not sure how a drop in polariser would work as you turn it to cut the correct light out etc.

I've got an 82mm filter, they go larger than that too. Biggest pain is using one with a large hood, as you can't turn it easily.

nellyleelephant

2,705 posts

234 months

Monday 23rd May 2016
quotequote all
It drops into the body of the lens at the camera body end.

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-canon-52mm-drop...

Digitalize

2,850 posts

135 months

Monday 23rd May 2016
quotequote all
Ah interesting, I was picturing the small square ones you can fit.

DarkMatter

Original Poster:

1,473 posts

231 months

Monday 23rd May 2016
quotequote all
Thank you all for your comments, it looks like I can carry on using my polarizing filter where appropriate.

gck303

203 posts

234 months

Sunday 5th June 2016
quotequote all
JSS 911 said:
DarkMatter said:
The recent UV filter thread, which several people advised against the use of such filters, has prompted me to ask the following.

Back in the pre-digital age I used a polarizing filter to give the fluffy white cloud effect and to reduce reflections from glass and water. Do people still use these filters with their digital cameras or are there camera/computer software tricks to give the same effect?

Thx.
I would say the polarizing filter is the only one you do really need.
And a ND (neutral density) one.

Plus, maybe a softening filter.

And a graduated ND filter.

And a UV one to protect your expensive lens.

Simpo Two

85,417 posts

265 months

Sunday 5th June 2016
quotequote all
And a Star 4!