CSL pics

Author
Discussion

trackdemon

Original Poster:

12,193 posts

262 months

Wednesday 27th April 2005
quotequote all
Fastest shoot I've ever done (a whole 45mins!) so their all in the same location. Hope to do a more extensive shoot of it sometime... Great sounding car the CSL!










V6GTO

11,579 posts

243 months

Wednesday 27th April 2005
quotequote all

_dobbo_

14,396 posts

249 months

Wednesday 27th April 2005
quotequote all
Class as usual! First one looks best for me, more interesting sky than the others.

pastor brian

7,585 posts

251 months

Wednesday 27th April 2005
quotequote all
Is it me or is the CSL really boring to look at?

Nice pics none the less.

_dobbo_

14,396 posts

249 months

Wednesday 27th April 2005
quotequote all
pastor brian said:
Is it me or is the CSL really boring to look at?

Nice pics none the less.


At the end of the day it's a 3 series beemer, no matter how big the wheels are.

However I wouldn't say boring - knowing what it is lends it an air of agression and menace that you don't get in a repmobile 318i!

rico

7,916 posts

256 months

Wednesday 27th April 2005
quotequote all
The CSL does look like any other 3-series coupe if you look quickly, but when you get up close you start to notice the carbon fibre bits and pieces, the suede steering wheel and other toys that really make it look the part.

Great car and great pics again Tracky... do you still actually work? You're doing TONNES of shoots these days.

Keep it up

Mannginger

9,074 posts

258 months

Wednesday 27th April 2005
quotequote all
Great Pics, awesome car, however I have a quick Q...Does it only use the inside exhaust pipes?

I ask as the inside pipes are considerably darker than the outside - shirley it's not just a MaxPower add on?

Still love the car though!

Phil

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

244 months

Thursday 28th April 2005
quotequote all
nice level horizons

trackdemon

Original Poster:

12,193 posts

262 months

Thursday 28th April 2005
quotequote all
dcw@pr said:
nice level horizons


Er, thanks... I think?

Ed Winchester

169 posts

238 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
Lovely shots.. I especially like the style of the 4th shot.
How do you manage to find such great locations? Do you spend time looking for them in advance?

Top class!

nomoregravy

1,857 posts

249 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
These photos are interesting, ive been looking at them since they went up because there is something about them which i just find not quite right, and Im shooting a csl soon, so its good to see your approach.

After a lot of consideration i think ive figured out what i dont like here. All of this is just my opinion but:

I dont think the location matches the car well. Id have gone for some urban/industrial stuff which i think would reinfoce the cars character.

As others have commented, at a glance it looks like any ordinary three series beemer. I think this is because you have shot the car from so low down the ground clearance is emphasised, which reduces the agressiveness of the stance in the photo.

Maybe taking some shots that lead the eye into the details would have helped reveal that its a csl not just any 3 series.

You say it only took 45 minutes, and the first one in particular looks rushed to me: if you had moved the car forward 5 feet you would have blocked off the puddle and the debris by the side of the road. (Obviously i cant tell if there is a wall just off the side of the frame). I guess I would have concentrated on getting 2/3 good shots.

Just some stuff to think about i guess.

Matt


406

3,636 posts

254 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
nomoregravy said:
if you had moved the car forward 5 feet you would have blocked off the puddle and the debris by the side of the road.



Photoshop is your friend - as they say

Nuggs

4,640 posts

235 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
Great shots

I really like the first one, the interesting sky and the way that colours contrast with the black of the car really make it*

*I realise that this sounds like a non-artistic person trying to sound arty and knowledgable. Unfortunatley, this is exactly what it is...

trackdemon

Original Poster:

12,193 posts

262 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
nomoregravy said:
These photos are interesting, ive been looking at them since they went up because there is something about them which i just find not quite right, and Im shooting a csl soon, so its good to see your approach.

After a lot of consideration i think ive figured out what i dont like here. All of this is just my opinion but:

I dont think the location matches the car well. Id have gone for some urban/industrial stuff which i think would reinfoce the cars character.

As others have commented, at a glance it looks like any ordinary three series beemer. I think this is because you have shot the car from so low down the ground clearance is emphasised, which reduces the agressiveness of the stance in the photo.

Maybe taking some shots that lead the eye into the details would have helped reveal that its a csl not just any 3 series.

You say it only took 45 minutes, and the first one in particular looks rushed to me: if you had moved the car forward 5 feet you would have blocked off the puddle and the debris by the side of the road. (Obviously i cant tell if there is a wall just off the side of the frame). I guess I would have concentrated on getting 2/3 good shots.

Just some stuff to think about i guess.

Matt




Indeed; as I said I had little or no choice in terms of location - any time spent trying to find a good location would have been doubled in time travelling back leaving virtually no time to shoot. In the end I opted to shoot at the nearest possible location that that was passable in the knowledge that I'll be able to do a more considered shoot in a better location at some point in the future.
Personally I think the biggest issue is the light - with the car being black and the photo's taken around 3:30 in the afternoon it was very difficult to try and capture the cars undoubtedly imposing lines / appearance. The harsh light rather washed out the details.
With the first shot, there was an outhouse building to the right which would have compromised the composition for me. These shots were done very much "at the drop of a hat" and I think it show's, but nonetheless I'm still happy with one or two of the shots as well as having learned a little more than I knew before - so I'd have to consider it a success overall. I'd expect to do a "proper" shoot of the car sometime in the next 4-5 weeks so hopefully this'll prove just to be a warm up for the main event.

406

3,636 posts

254 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
trackdemon said:

I'm still happy with one or two of the shots as well as having learned a little more than I knew before - so I'd have to consider it a success overall.


As I have said before on here, if your happy then thats all that really matters as long as they are your shots. If they are for a "Punter", then if they are happy then thats fine also. Paople can be really anal about pics sometimes.

Dave

poah

2,142 posts

229 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
do you use a circular poleriser when you shoot plus a grad filter when taking so much sky?

trackdemon

Original Poster:

12,193 posts

262 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Polariser - almost always
Grad - no

poah

2,142 posts

229 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
a grad would have helped these shots a lot

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

244 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
poah said:
a grad would have helped these shots a lot


I don't see how - there doesn't seem to be any exposure problems between the car and the sky

V6GTO

11,579 posts

243 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
dcw@pr said:

poah said:
a grad would have helped these shots a lot



I don't see how - there doesn't seem to be any exposure problems between the car and the sky


I'agree with Poah...they would have helping bring the car and the sky closer together tonally, reducing the contrast between the two, thus making it easier to look at. IMHO.

Martin.

PS - you can do it in PS as well