300mm lense

Author
Discussion

size13

Original Poster:

2,023 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
I'm after a 300mm lense for my D70 for < £400.
Main use will be outside taking pictures of boats, so may be moving fast - usually not!

I'm looking at (number in bracket is score from fm reviews):

Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 Aspherical Macro - not good reviews (5.9)
Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO Macro Super DG
Tamron AF 28-300mm XR Di LD Aspherical Macro IF f3.5-6.3 (8)
AF Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G or AF Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED

beano500

20,854 posts

276 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
S/hand Nikkor F4?

www.graysofwestminster.co.uk/products/secondhand.php?cat1=2

>> Edited by beano500 on Thursday 2nd June 12:16

size13

Original Poster:

2,023 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
What's the difference between that and the 2 nikons I've listed?

I'm a bit new to lenses!

>> Edited by size13 on Thursday 2nd June 12:21

beano500

20,854 posts

276 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
Prime

size13

Original Poster:

2,023 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
Oh, I thought you were talking about the 70-300mm f/4-5.6D AF ED Zoom-Nikkor boxed

A bit of range would be best - I didn't mean prime in my original post - sorry

beano500

20,854 posts

276 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
MXV have one for 295... or an AFS for nearer a monkey...

(search under Nikon AF - prime lens....)

HankScorpio

715 posts

238 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
I've heard and read good things about the Tamron, it's considered an excellent "walk around" lens but if it's specifically longer your looking for, maybe something with a narrower range may be more appropriate and less of a compromise....?

beano500

20,854 posts

276 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
Ah - see, I don't think zoom first, and when you said 300.....

...well, I am still considering which one to get, myself, hence I know who's got what at the mo!

size13

Original Poster:

2,023 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
What's the difference between the Nikkor G, and D ED?

According to Ken Rockwell...

"It ought to be similar to the 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED AF since I suspect it has the same optics. This G lens has sloppier mechanics and a plastic mount; the three times as expensive ED version has a metal mount. I suspect the glass is the same on both but haven't actually shot them head-to head to confirm."

>> Edited by size13 on Thursday 2nd June 12:32

beano500

20,854 posts

276 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
size13 said:
What's the difference between the Nikkor G, and D ED?
ED - significantly better optically - uses low dispersion glass, more expensive to manufacture, therefore more £££

cammers

396 posts

269 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
I use the Tamron 28-300 with my D70. I'd say that for the money, it's a superb all rounder!

size13

Original Poster:

2,023 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
Anybody tried the new Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II?

HankScorpio

715 posts

238 months

Thursday 2nd June 2005
quotequote all
Looking on fredmiranda, the Tamron AF 28-300mm XR Di LD Aspherical Macro IF f3.5-6.3 only gets 5.6?
The reviews seem ok but they've scored it low.