Macro Photo thread

Author
Discussion

RobbieKB

7,715 posts

183 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
I manned up and I'm so glad I did. He very carefully and tentatively climbed on to my hand. After a while of being a bit jumpy and nervy he started to roam my arm and then sat comfortably on my for about an hour whilst I took pictures. Then, to my surprise, every time I tried to put him back in the tank he jumped on to my arm and ran back up and sat there. hehe



Sorry not strictly a macro!

LongQ

13,864 posts

233 months

Saturday 13th October 2012
quotequote all
RobbieKB said:
I manned up and I'm so glad I did. He very carefully and tentatively climbed on to my hand. After a while of being a bit jumpy and nervy he started to roam my arm and then sat comfortably on my for about an hour whilst I took pictures. Then, to my surprise, every time I tried to put him back in the tank he jumped on to my arm and ran back up and sat there. hehe



Sorry not strictly a macro!
Probably weighing up the calorific value ....


wink


Nice shot. Taken one handed or did you have a tripod set up and a remote release?

DibblyDobbler

11,271 posts

197 months

Saturday 13th October 2012
quotequote all
Get in a bit closer Rob you big girl !

RobbieKB

7,715 posts

183 months

Saturday 13th October 2012
quotequote all
LongQ said:
Probably weighing up the calorific value ....


wink


Nice shot. Taken one handed or did you have a tripod set up and a remote release?
One handed. He wasn't much up for getting off of my arm and I hadn't pre-set anything up. You know it's a big bug when you have to use a 50mm hehe

DibblyDobbler said:
Get in a bit closer Rob you big girl !
He's literally on my person, how much closer do you want?! I can't say I'm keen on him having wings though I must say.

Ed_P

701 posts

269 months

Saturday 13th October 2012
quotequote all
I'm more comfortable with something this size - 3mm ...


Nigma walckenaeri? by Ed Phillips 01, on Flickr

paul911

2,770 posts

233 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all

tenex

1,010 posts

168 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
paul911 said:

Like it. thumbup

paul911

2,770 posts

233 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
tenex said:
paul911 said:

Like it. thumbup
Thanks smile, I don’t normally go out of my way to take flower pics hehe, but about to put the lens up for sale.

Dogsey

4,300 posts

230 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
paul911 said:
Thanks smile, I don’t normally go out of my way to take flower pics hehe, but about to put the lens up for sale.
Paul is that the 100mm F2.8? If so how much?

tenex

1,010 posts

168 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
That's a lot more than a "flower pic".

paul911

2,770 posts

233 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
Dogsey said:
Paul is that the 100mm F2.8? If so how much?
It is the 100mm f2.8 Mike. Probably better if I email you, don’t want to break any PH rules.whistle

tenex said:
That's a lot more than a "flower pic".
Thanks, should I keep it then hehe

Dogsey

4,300 posts

230 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
paul911 said:
Dogsey said:
Paul is that the 100mm F2.8? If so how much?
It is the 100mm f2.8 Mike. Probably better if I email you, don’t want to break any PH rules.whistle
Please do.

tilley441

330 posts

153 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all

Ed_P

701 posts

269 months

Saturday 27th October 2012
quotequote all
A globular springtail (about 1.5mm long). There are lots of these under fallen leaves in my garden at the moment.


Globular Springtail by Ed Phillips 01, on Flickr

Canon MP-E 65mm at full stretch (x5) + 1.4 extender + flash. They're only just visible with the naked eye. Finding with the lens is a nightmare!

DibblyDobbler

11,271 posts

197 months

Saturday 27th October 2012
quotequote all
Ed_P said:
A globular springtail (about 1.5mm long). There are lots of these under fallen leaves in my garden at the moment.


Globular Springtail by Ed Phillips 01, on Flickr

Canon MP-E 65mm at full stretch (x5) + 1.4 extender + flash. They're only just visible with the naked eye. Finding with the lens is a nightmare!
You must have the patience of a saint to get that Ed thumbup

I'd never thought of using a tc with the MPE - is that to give more working distance ? Any negative effects ?

Ed_P

701 posts

269 months

Saturday 27th October 2012
quotequote all
DibblyDobbler said:
You must have the patience of a saint to get that Ed thumbup

I'd never thought of using a tc with the MPE - is that to give more working distance ? Any negative effects ?
It's to increase magnification primarily, for very small "subjects". Not sure of the effect on working distance; doesn't seem to affect image quality noticeably.

I've seen reports of people using stacked 1.4x and 2x extenders AND extension tubes to get even more magnification. Will also seriously affect the brightness of the image in the viewfinder. I'm assuming you'd be using "static" subjects for that sort of setup!

DibblyDobbler

11,271 posts

197 months

Saturday 27th October 2012
quotequote all
Ed_P said:
DibblyDobbler said:
You must have the patience of a saint to get that Ed thumbup

I'd never thought of using a tc with the MPE - is that to give more working distance ? Any negative effects ?
It's to increase magnification primarily, for very small "subjects". Not sure of the effect on working distance; doesn't seem to affect image quality noticeably.

I've seen reports of people using stacked 1.4x and 2x extenders AND extension tubes to get even more magnification. Will also seriously affect the brightness of the image in the viewfinder. I'm assuming you'd be using "static" subjects for that sort of setup!
That's interesting as I thought a tc did not add magnification - will check where I read that...

DibblyDobbler

11,271 posts

197 months

Saturday 27th October 2012
quotequote all
DibblyDobbler said:
Ed_P said:
DibblyDobbler said:
You must have the patience of a saint to get that Ed thumbup

I'd never thought of using a tc with the MPE - is that to give more working distance ? Any negative effects ?
It's to increase magnification primarily, for very small "subjects". Not sure of the effect on working distance; doesn't seem to affect image quality noticeably.

I've seen reports of people using stacked 1.4x and 2x extenders AND extension tubes to get even more magnification. Will also seriously affect the brightness of the image in the viewfinder. I'm assuming you'd be using "static" subjects for that sort of setup!
That's interesting as I thought a tc did not add magnification - will check where I read that...
I think it's the fact that the minimum focus distance is unchanged that I was thinking of smile

Must be next-to-impossible to use at 5x on the MPE though ?!

LongQ

13,864 posts

233 months

Saturday 27th October 2012
quotequote all
Ed_P said:
A globular springtail (about 1.5mm long). There are lots of these under fallen leaves in my garden at the moment.


Globular Springtail by Ed Phillips 01, on Flickr

Canon MP-E 65mm at full stretch (x5) + 1.4 extender + flash. They're only just visible with the naked eye. Finding with the lens is a nightmare!
Bravo! Awesome dedication.

I think dedication is the correct word. Not sure though ....

RobbieKB

7,715 posts

183 months

Sunday 28th October 2012
quotequote all
Ed_P said:
A globular springtail (about 1.5mm long). There are lots of these under fallen leaves in my garden at the moment.


Globular Springtail by Ed Phillips 01, on Flickr

Canon MP-E 65mm at full stretch (x5) + 1.4 extender + flash. They're only just visible with the naked eye. Finding with the lens is a nightmare!
clap Great stuff!