Bird Photography help

Author
Discussion

covboy

Original Poster:

2,577 posts

175 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Looking to try a bit of bird photography for the first time. I know NOTHING about bird behaviour however, and was looking to set up a garden “bird table” with the camera close by on a tripod & remotely fired.( have telephoto lenses but looking at the easy option to start with)
Questions – Would I need to camouflage the camera in any way and would the birds be put off by the shutter going off and not return?

K12beano

20,854 posts

276 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
They'd probably get used to the camera very quickly. Easier if they are expecting food on a bird table.

Potentially the noise might be disturbing. But "the Brick" at 200mm to 400mm distance is no problem for birds at my outlaws. Hell, I can even sit/stand in front of them there (Wye Valley, Herefordshire - permanent bird table five paces from back door!)

GetCarter

29,404 posts

280 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
I have a zigview - remote movement sensor. It works well. Camera set up 4 feet from bird table - they soon get used to it.

This was taken while I was down the pub!


14-7

6,233 posts

192 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
I have a zigview - remote movement sensor.

This was taken while I was down the pub!
Does that not take the fun out of it?

I can understand it may just catch 'that' picture but part of the fun for me is actually doing it myself.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
AFIC Copyright belings to whatever presses the shutter release, so well done hardware, nice pic...

Ed_P

701 posts

270 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
I created a set-up in my garden, specifically to capture garden birds. I wanted to use them as "stock" images, so needed an uncluttered background and an arrangement that would look as natural as possible.

I fixed a bird table to a wall close by a window. The table has a large staple hammered into the edge where I can push a twig "perch". I keep the table stocked with a variety of bird food. When I fancy a bit of photography, I open the window and cover the opening with a piece of material with a hole cut in it. I put the camera on a tripod pointing through the hole at the perch, and wait. Here's a sample shot:



I decided to operate the system "manually", because I needed to wait for shots where I would get good positioning and focus. Some birds are remarkably tolerant of the camera shutter noise (it's only about 4 feet away (with a 70-200mm lens), others are away after the first click.

GetCarter

29,404 posts

280 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
14-7 said:
GetCarter said:
I have a zigview - remote movement sensor.

This was taken while I was down the pub!
Does that not take the fun out of it?

I can understand it may just catch 'that' picture but part of the fun for me is actually doing it myself.
Try just 'catching' a Pine Marten. wink


Ed_P

701 posts

270 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
You might be interested Covboy, in joining a specialist wildlife forum. There's a new group; the Amateur Wildlife Filmmakers Network (AWFN), that has a forum at www.talkwildlife.com/. It's still getting established, but could develop into a good resource for the type of thing you are hoping to do.

jimmy306

3,691 posts

188 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
covboy said:
Looking to try a bit of bird photography for the first time. I know NOTHING about bird behaviour however, and was looking to set up a garden “bird table” with the camera close by on a tripod & remotely fired.( have telephoto lenses but looking at the easy option to start with)
Questions – Would I need to camouflage the camera in any way and would the birds be put off by the shutter going off and not return?
I do a lot of bird photography, and agree with others when they say that it would take the fun out of it using a remote release, i also think you will get far better, more natural shots taking them yourself. I suggest "planting" a branch in the ground near the feeder that will allow the birds to perch before/after they feed. This allows you to get a shot that doesent have a feeder in it, and therefore looks much more authentic. If your feeder is close to a window you can shoot out of that without disturbing them, otherwise you may want to invest in a small hide to use.

You will need to think about light and background when deciding where to place your branch and feeder, somewhere bright and with something that will give a nice boquet in the background.

Fast shutter speeds help a lot, depending on the bird your shooting you may get away with slightly slower ones (Great tits for example stay still a lot more then other tit species) but for coal tits/long tailed tit and especially goldcrests really you will want a shutter speed of over 1/500th of a second.

Edited by jimmy306 on Tuesday 2nd March 13:51

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
I have a zigview - remote movement sensor. It works well. Camera set up 4 feet from bird table - they soon get used to it.

This was taken while I was down the pub!

That is truly magnificent, Steve.

I have looked into a ZigView as I can see it could be lots of fun - how did you protect all the kit, just four feet from the bird table? Did you build some sort of camera box/bird feeding station combination?

Looks like a hoot to try! And what a result! Magnificent image.

GetCarter

29,404 posts

280 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Hi Don

I didn't really protect the kit, I just made sure it was a sunny day! Having said that, when I did my 24 hour timelapse, I simply wrapped the camera in a plastic bag. It didn't seem to mind (It was a D2X though with proper waterproof seals).

Here are a couple more ziggies. It works well as a motion sensor, but I have to say the instructions are a nightmare. As for using a motion sensor being less fun than sitting still waiting for hours - well that's just down to personal preference I guess.




Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Wonderful pics!

I take it you just set it up pointing at the feeder on a tripod and then focussed on the right bit and left it taking pics?

That Zigview widget is quite a price (for me) so I might try emulating the idea with a long distance remote, several beers and the kitchen window! biggrin

GetCarter

29,404 posts

280 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Don said:
I take it you just set it up pointing at the feeder on a tripod and then focussed on the right bit and left it taking pics?
yep.. exactly that.

JustinP1

13,330 posts

231 months

Thursday 4th March 2010
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
Hi Don

I didn't really protect the kit, I just made sure it was a sunny day! Having said that, when I did my 24 hour timelapse, I simply wrapped the camera in a plastic bag. It didn't seem to mind (It was a D2X though with proper waterproof seals).

Here are a couple more ziggies. It works well as a motion sensor, but I have to say the instructions are a nightmare. As for using a motion sensor being less fun than sitting still waiting for hours - well that's just down to personal preference I guess.



Super photos!

Can I ask what kit you are using for those?

I can't get anywhere near as sharp as that using a telephoto - although I am guessing that it is a fast lens, good light, and maybe a flash too?

GetCarter

29,404 posts

280 months

Thursday 4th March 2010
quotequote all
That was a D2X with a Nikkor 70-300 ED. It was however... pretty close to the subject (using the motion sensor)

This was hand held from about 20 feet



Sharp is always cos it's sunny! (So I can set speed to about 1000th sec)

Duck_Pond

98 posts

193 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
Remote photography can be used for some pics but chances are, you'll miss the focus on the subject, like the blue tit on the string above, where the string is in focus but the head of the bird isn't.

It also takes the fun out of it and your garden birds will soon become used to you being sat nearby, if you provide enough food.

As someone already said, put out some more natural perching points; logs, sticks even moss-covered stones to get them to land upon - just makes a much better shot.

I've been taking shots of birds since 2006 (my website: http://petewalkdensbirdphotography.fotopic.net) and love the challenge of it. Most of my shots in the garden have been with my 100-400mm lens, often less than 400mm, so you can get away with a "cheaper" lens for such work.

Problem is, you may then get the bug for it, move out of the confines of your garden and then realise you need more reach, and that I'm afraid is a slippery slope to being in the red!

Edited by Duck_Pond on Friday 5th March 13:11

GetCarter

29,404 posts

280 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
Duck_Pond said:
Remote photography can be used for some pics but chances are, you'll miss the focus on the subject, like the blue tit on the string above, where the string is in focus but the head of the bird isn't.
Or use a remote and increase your depth of field. wink

Duck_Pond

98 posts

193 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
Yeah, and the likes of Nigel Blake achieves awesome shots with wide angle / fish-eye lenses, but for the average person without a lake and field in their garden, you'd achieve better shots holding the camera.

The ideal shots of birds in gardens have a narrow DOF so as to blur out the gnomes etc in the background wink

Edited by Duck_Pond on Friday 5th March 15:43

Duck_Pond

98 posts

193 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
But then again, the thread starter isn't probably interested in getting their shots published, so yeah, the RC stuff is worth a shot. smile

Might be worth covering the camera to stop the subjects erm, leaving their mark on it. smile