Lens internal reflection?

Author
Discussion

GlenMH

Original Poster:

5,212 posts

243 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
Hi all

SWMBO bought me the very nice Nikkor 70-300mm VR II zoom lens for my D90. I have been using it for night photography on a tripod to capture the highlights of the local cityscape.

Recently I took this as a test shot:



Please forget the issues that:
1. I have cut the top of the tower off
2. The horizon is not straight
3. The image is a bit fuzzy: don't put your tripod on wood decking as it moves. Also don't try and take pictures from a 33rd floor balcony when the whole building is swaying in the strong wind yikes

My question is: why have I got an inverted ghost image of the blue lights on the tower? I haven't seen this on any of the other pictures I have taken.

Here is the EXIF data for info:

File Info 1
File: Tokyo Tower 0813.JPG
Date Created: 13/08/2010 13:15:06
Date Modified: 13/08/2010 13:15:06
File Size: 4.38 MB
Image Size: L (4288 x 2848)
File Info 2
Date Shot: 13/08/2010 13:15:06.00
World Time: UTC+9, DST:OFF
Image Quality: Jpeg Fine (8-bit)
Artist:
Copyright:
Image Comment:
Camera Info
Device: Nikon D90
Lens: VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G
Focal Length: 180mm
Focus Mode: AF-A
AF-Area Mode: Wide Area
VR: ON
AF Fine Tune:
Exposure
Aperture: F/8
Shutter Speed: 2s
Exposure Mode: Manual
Exposure Comp.: +0.7EV
Exposure Tuning:
Metering: Center-Weighted
ISO Sensitivity: ISO 200
Image Settings
White Balance: Auto, 0, 0
Color Space: sRGB
High ISO NR: OFF
Long Exposure NR: OFF
Active D-Lighting: Auto
Sharpening: 3

Thanks for any help with this!

Fordo

1,535 posts

224 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
i've had this before in a similar situation with similar lens- was at the top of the Hilton in Park Lane doing timelapse of the skyline using a nikkor 55-200 mm lens.

On closer inspection the BT tower had exactly the same type of flare you've got i your photo. I put it down to internal lens reflections like you mentioned in the title. weird, isnt it? I've never noticed it in any other situation other than point light sources at night



crmcatee

5,694 posts

227 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
do you have a filter on the front ?

dilbert

7,741 posts

231 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
I think that in industrial/scientific applications they fill their optics with oil to prevent this sort of thing.

GlenMH

Original Poster:

5,212 posts

243 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
crmcatee said:
do you have a filter on the front ?
Yes - I have got a screw on UV filter on the front. Will this make a difference (apart from costing me .5 to 1 stop of light)?

Nick M

3,624 posts

223 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
GlenMH said:
crmcatee said:
do you have a filter on the front ?
Yes - I have got a screw on UV filter on the front. Will this make a difference (apart from costing me .5 to 1 stop of light)?
It may actually be what is causing the reflection, especially if it's a cheaper one.

And a UV fiter won't lose you anything like that much light - I doubt it would even make .1 of a stop difference, let alone 1/2 to a whole stop.

GlenMH

Original Poster:

5,212 posts

243 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
It's a Hoya one so not the cheapest out there...

I will have another go when the tower is lit up like that again without the filter.

pernod

433 posts

188 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
A couple of my lenses (notably the nifty 50 was one) did the same until someone suggest I remove the UV filter from the front for night shots. Fixed it straight up. Was surprised at that being the cause as they are top of the line filters, but apparently it's a common issue.

JJM

468 posts

189 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
I had a similar issue with my 450d earlier this year, was down to the uv filter...

http://mobile.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=...

GlenMH

Original Poster:

5,212 posts

243 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
thumbup Thanks all - I will have a go without the filter when it has next got its fancy lights on again.

Lucas CAV

3,022 posts

219 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Lose the filter permanently!

Just be more careful with your lens.....


(assuming that's why you have the filter on it? not sure why people do this..)

Simpo Two

85,394 posts

265 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Lucas CAV said:
Lose the filter permanently!

Just be more careful with your lens.....


(assuming that's why you have the filter on it? not sure why people do this..)
Actually that's one thing missing from the 'Stages of a Photographer' graph!

crmcatee

5,694 posts

227 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Some lenses don't become fully sealed until a filter is put on the front. I know the 16-35 I'm looking at the moment is one that needs a filter on the front to become fully sealed.


Admittingly, you need to be shooting in dusty / wet conditions to want to keep the filter on - otherwise its off.