Lorry hits Lambeth bridge despite huge warning signs
Discussion
In cases like this, where a railway bridge has enormous signs with black and yellow chevrons everywhere.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-362009...
Are the drivers getting done for driving without due care and are their insurance companies getting hit for the consequential losses to the railway?
And if not, why not?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-362009...
Are the drivers getting done for driving without due care and are their insurance companies getting hit for the consequential losses to the railway?
And if not, why not?
There's a bridge by Ely Station with 9' clearance, so low enough that it's in eyeline as you approach. Covered in hi viz, illuminated warning signs with sensor beams that trigger them if a high vehicle approaches. And an alternative route next to it via a level crossing.
It's not uncommon for it to be hit more than once in any given week. And none of the drivers ever seem to be prosecuted.
It's not uncommon for it to be hit more than once in any given week. And none of the drivers ever seem to be prosecuted.
Ean218 said:
In cases like this, where a railway bridge has enormous signs with black and yellow chevrons everywhere.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-362009...
Are the drivers getting done for driving without due care and are their insurance companies getting hit for the consequential losses to the railway?
And if not, why not?
I imagine they should be getting done for driving without due care but i don't think insurance companies cover those types of consequential losses. If they did,then imagine how much they would have to pay out every time someone has an accident on the motorway and causes a mile or 2 long traffic jamhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-362009...
Are the drivers getting done for driving without due care and are their insurance companies getting hit for the consequential losses to the railway?
And if not, why not?
12 bridge strikes reported this week. There are numerous unreported ones to consider too.
That's 155 trains and over 1000 min of delays.
the Lambeth delays are still rising as I type this post.
No doubt it'll be the Railways fault for making them too easy to crash into.
That's 155 trains and over 1000 min of delays.
the Lambeth delays are still rising as I type this post.
No doubt it'll be the Railways fault for making them too easy to crash into.
Edited by Rick101 on Wednesday 4th May 18:47
Retroman said:
I imagine they should be getting done for driving without due care but i don't think insurance companies cover those types of consequential losses. If they did,then imagine how much they would have to pay out every time someone has an accident on the motorway and causes a mile or 2 long traffic jam
You should brush up on what exactly the law requires insurance polices to cover. These "consequential losses" are incurred by third parties and that's exactly the cover that the law requires all drivers to have in place as a minimum. Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff