Pirbright Speed limit Change!!!

Pirbright Speed limit Change!!!

Author
Discussion

Landshark

Original Poster:

2,117 posts

181 months

Vixpy1

42,622 posts

264 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Another road ruined!

DodgeeDave

507 posts

195 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Shame really, but understandable in the light of all the accidents.

AlexRS2782

8,040 posts

213 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Oh fantastic - another decent road ruined frown

Been driving that road since i was 17 & in various different types of car (performance & far from performance hehe ) & i've never once come anywhere near having an accident smile

A large number of times i drive down there during the day, i usually find myself behind a driver who can't seem to drive higher than 35mph and brakes heavily for every corner like their life depended on it. Funny as when the road is clear, you can easily drive the entire stretch well within the NSL stretch without going off the road rolleyes Funnily enough i also find that the ones who tend to refuse to do more than 35odd in the NSL are the same ones who then speed up when they hit the straight parts of Pirbright where the limit has been 40 for ages and then continue to do at least 40 odd through the 30mph limit of Pirbright itself wink

I find myself being one of the few people that actually drives through Pirbright at 30mph rolleyes

No doubt once the limits are brought in you'll have the "must do 5-10mph under the actual limit" brigade out in force, which now seems to be the norm on the roads round here that have recently been subject to a speed change like the Red Road, Maultway, etc frown

Edited by AlexRS2782 on Monday 25th March 19:26

SVTRick

3,633 posts

195 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Who is this James Dennis geezer then ??

Was bound to happen sooner or later
RIP Dean (17) - a sad victim of a young and foolish driver.
You were a good lad now missed by your friends and peers


Landshark

Original Poster:

2,117 posts

181 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
SVTRick said:
Who is this James Dennis geezer then ??
hehe

Vixpy1

42,622 posts

264 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Landshark said:
SVTRick said:
Who is this James Dennis geezer then ??
hehe
hehe Just seen that

driverrob

4,688 posts

203 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
One of my last IAM sessions was that road. My "instructor" told me he wanted to see smooth driving but coming within a gnat's whisker of the NSL (OWTTE). Nice one. No more frown

SVTRick

3,633 posts

195 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Vixpy1 said:
Landshark said:
SVTRick said:
Who is this James Dennis geezer then ??
hehe
hehe Just seen that
Information on a need to know basis 007

Just shows who reads the link and takes note eh wink

Dave 500

6,327 posts

242 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
That has to be the most dangerous mile of road in the country. Nearly 3 (2.75) injury accidents a month for the last two and a half years and I'm guessing that doesn't include the fender benders.

scratchchin

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

191 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Hardly a surprise! One of the most lethal roads I can think of.

Dave 500

6,327 posts

242 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Erm is this supposed to be in the report

"It is clear that the present situation is unsatisfactory. For whatever reason,
drivers are adopting inappropriate speeds. The speed management options are
limited given the geometry of the roads, which also makes police speed
enforcement impractical"

So they will put up signs but not do anything confused

This is interesting

2. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS PIRBRIGHT BENDS
2.1 There were 77 personal injury accidents between January 2009 and July 2012
inclusive. Of these 61 involved skidding or loss of control and 55 involved a
single vehicle.
2.2 56 accidents involved vehicles leaving the carriageway into a ditch, hitting other
objects such as lamp columns or overturning.
2.3 39% of drivers were males aged between 17 23 years old. Of 57 drivers
breath-tested, 2 were positive, both females aged 34 and 58.
2.4 Postcode data has shown that there is no significant involvement of soldiers
from the local barracks.
3. VEHICLE SPEEDS
3.1 The geometry of the bends does not encourage very fast speeds, but the nature
of the accidents suggests that many drivers are driving above the appropriate
speed for the location. Annex 2 shows the average speeds of over 1000
Page 26vehicles (fitted with compatible mobile devices, such as satnav) during 2011.
Also, shown is speed data obtained using automatic speed measuring
equipment continually over a week in February 2013
3.2 It is difficult to get meaningful average speeds because the bends mean that
vehicles are continually braking and accelerating but it is clear that the slower
speeds are occurring in the middle section near the railway bridge


krisdelta

4,566 posts

201 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I'm moving soon and this wonderful road will be on my daily commute - I don't understand all the accidents, how fast are people driving before crashing?

Coming from the Brookwood side, the first section down to the bridge is well sighted, with the next section towards Camberley (if heading under the bridge) being much slower. It's lovely to drive - hopefully the reduced limits will not spoil the enjoyment too much and slow those people going too quickly for the road.

Dizeee

18,291 posts

206 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Yep, I put a lot of work into this so glad it has paid off.

My work was solely around the residential end, nothing to do with the bends themselves, FWIW the limit change and signage there had already been agreed and signed off when I presented the petition for our end of the road.

We should be getting two physical features (chicanes with priorty arrows) past the houses, making it impossible for anyone to do the usual 80mph + past the front door.

It's been a long time coming, and the 40mph limit outside the houses is woefully inadequate, dangerous and ignored by practically everyone.

Frik

13,542 posts

243 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Chicanes make sense by your bit but the change of limit further on seems utterly pointless. If the 40mph limit isn't slowing people past your house then why should it make any difference further up the road?

The same knee-jerk policy by the same people who dropped the limit from 50 to 40 on the A322 around Fox Corner when it really wasn't required.

edc

9,234 posts

251 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Living in Frimley Green but driving to Woking and Guildford quite often I drive this road quite frequently. In the main I am pretty sensible past the houses by the bridge. I will where conditions allow really push on through the rest though if I'm in the mood. I can't remember a time when I've been stopped or seen a police vehicle around. The one time I did see one was late at night parked up in the dirt/gravel layby on the left by the field as you approach the bridge from the Pirbright end.

In all honesty I don't think the change of speed limit is going to change the attitude of drivers. What might though is some of those rumble type surfacings, better reflective signs for night and even some armco to stop the off-road excursions going into trees?

krisdelta

4,566 posts

201 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Dizeee said:
It's been a long time coming, and the 40mph limit outside the houses is woefully inadequate, dangerous and ignored by practically everyone.
I've been overtaken and tailgated many a time along that stretch, 40 would be fine, IF people stuck to it IMHO - but happy to rumble past at 30 too smile

omgus

7,305 posts

175 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I imagine this will be as successful in slowing people down as the new limits on the Maultway.


thatsprettyshady

1,824 posts

165 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I misread the title as the Pirbright Speel Limit Challenge initially wink

But in all seriousness I think the sensible drivers who are real petrol heads will always have the sense to turn the wick down when in a residential area, although I drove this road today and was sorry to see yet another hole in the undergrowth complete with police tape (down a embankment eek )

I'm not sure there is much that will stop the boy racers who are determined to go as quick as possible wherever they go but I really hope that this "traffic calming" doesn't turn a wonderful flowing bit of road into a boring low speed procession, if I wanted that I'd pop the f1 on on a Sunday morning instead smile

Bravo for sticking up for the local residents though, it's a tough one.

Jagmanv12

1,573 posts

164 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Dave 500 said:
Erm is this supposed to be in the report

3.2 It is difficult to get meaningful average speeds because the bends mean that
vehicles are continually braking and accelerating but it is clear that the slower
speeds are occurring in the middle section near the railway bridge

Who wrote this rubbish. Of course it's slower by the bridge, it's an S bend not a straight road.

OK, reduce the limit by the houses but unnecessary for the rest of the open road. Just because a few bad drivers can't drive properly the majority have to accept ridiculous limits.