Repairable? Or am I looking for a donor body?

Repairable? Or am I looking for a donor body?

Author
Discussion

Wedg1e

26,803 posts

265 months

Saturday 24th September 2016
quotequote all
440Interceptor said:
Morning all, I have a gas strut question..
The originals were 100N, for bonnet and tailgate glass. I'm sure the DHCs bootlid usd the same.


440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Saturday 24th September 2016
quotequote all
Thanks Ian, that sounds right as its the lowest pressure I can order in that size,

Cheers.

440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Update: Struts installed. You don't want to go any more than 100Nm on the bonnet, they are spot on. I ended up recycling two old ones for the boot, both are a lot less that 100Nm which is fne as the boot lid doesn't weigh much.

In other news, I just bought 7 metres of pinchweld and installed it in 1 run from one door across the windscreen and around the other door. Fitted perfectly first time with some persuasion from a soft mallet and riveted at each end due to the tight corner at the top of each door. The doors now close beautifully and there's no movement at all in the roof panel any more because the rubber holds it snug. Result.

She's almost ready to go off the the mechanic for the bits I can't (due to lack of knowledge, lack of a hoist or both..).

i.e. adjust exhaust system for clearance and tighten up, fill, bleed and test brakes, fit rear mufflers, recommission engine bay wiring plus all lights, and check all other electrics (already reinstalled). Front and rear wheel alignment, fit new battery and battery holder (there has to be a better solution that the old plastic strap..), and anything else that doesn't work when tested.

Then, start up.

Aim is to get her licensed and on the road by Christmas. Can't believe I'm nearly there... Still time for it to go t!ts up though I guess.....

mrzigazaga

18,557 posts

165 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Hi Mate...

You certainly have come a long way with it...Hats off to you for persevering... smile

adam quantrill

11,538 posts

242 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
As you are so close I think we can now say:

A. Repairable.


440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Thanks guys, truth is I (rightly) wouldn't have attempted it without access to this forum. the collective knowledge and goodwill offered here is priceless.

440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Saturday 8th October 2016
quotequote all
Here she is off to the mechanic to complete wiring and some other stuff. plan is for him to test everything and get it to the point I can take it over the pits and get it road registered.

440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Saturday 8th October 2016
quotequote all

440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Saturday 8th October 2016
quotequote all
...but not out of the woods yet. I still need to sort the following:

1. Fuel lines in front wheelarch have no protection. Can I check (again) how this should be addressed please as this one worries me.
2. I binned the insipid old horn unit so I need a nice loud replacement. Shouldn't be a problem.
3. Still need to put on side pods, front spoiler and rear exhaust valance when I get the car back.
4. I ended up putting in a big bearing on the steering shaft on the inside of the footwell similar to what others have done. Not sure if others have had the later setup with the SD1 shaft but mine is TR7. The knuckle joint is only 2-3mm from the body in the footwell, not enough to get a collar to bolt into, despite hours of looking at it. Here's a shot of it before I did what I've done. Which was, to use 10mm bolts from the inside and just use washers and nylocs on the outside (wheelarch). Using any sort of plate fouls the shaft joint. I am hoping there is not enough movement to damage the fibreglass but it's rock solid now. Any thoughts? (sorry no photo).

mrzigazaga

18,557 posts

165 months

Saturday 8th October 2016
quotequote all
Looking good mate...

The steering knuckle looks a bit too long..It shouldn't really be that close to the bulkhead...

440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Sunday 9th October 2016
quotequote all
I hear you Zig, but that's the only position where it fits both ends of the steering shaft. There no adjustment at the steering wheel end because the shaft is spot welded to the bracket that supports it/attaches it to the dash. The Bible shows the bracket as a separate part but mines welded.

The dash never came out of the car during the rebuild so nothing's been moved.

Any thoughts on fuel line protection/routing?

mrzigazaga

18,557 posts

165 months

Sunday 9th October 2016
quotequote all
Hi Toby.


I do recall my 280i fuel lines running up the N\S chassis member..Mainly due to the fuel pump and accumulator being on that side...I think the return ran next to it as well..Good quality hose shouldn't need protection...smile

Number 7

4,103 posts

262 months

Sunday 9th October 2016
quotequote all
440Interceptor said:
I hear you Zig, but that's the only position where it fits both ends of the steering shaft. There no adjustment at the steering wheel end because the shaft is spot welded to the bracket that supports it/attaches it to the dash. The Bible shows the bracket as a separate part but mines welded.

The dash never came out of the car during the rebuild so nothing's been moved.

Any thoughts on fuel line protection/routing?
Surely the shaft is telescopic, so unless you're at it max (which I doubt), you should be able to persuade it further into the wheel arch. Just need to be careful not to damage it - I've used a hose clip tightened around the shaft inside the footwell, which gives something to press / tap against.

440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Monday 10th October 2016
quotequote all
Number 7, I assumed the shaft length was fixed rather than telescopic. that would help A LOT!. I hope you're right.

Zig, I'm just thinking high pressure rubber fuel hose is vulnerable to a nail being flicked up of the tyre or similar. I have a 1 inch hole in the top of the wheelarch through which the fuel lines pass on their way to/from the fuel injection unit. So the hoses have to come up the back of the wheelarch rather than going inboard to pass through it? Mine 1984, maybe they changed this later on?

mrzigazaga

18,557 posts

165 months

Monday 10th October 2016
quotequote all
440Interceptor said:
Zig, I'm just thinking high pressure rubber fuel hose is vulnerable to a nail being flicked up of the tyre or similar. I have a 1 inch hole in the top of the wheelarch through which the fuel lines pass on their way to/from the fuel injection unit. So the hoses have to come up the back of the wheelarch rather than going inboard to pass through it? Mine 1984, maybe they changed this later on?
I have seen the fuel hose on a 400SE coming up through the wheel arch...Strange how the 350i in-between didn't...In honesty i should imagine that the hose would be hard to penetrate unless sufficient force was used to push something into it...If you are worried then perhaps use some still braiding over that section...Mind you a snake could bite it i guess...smile

The Hatter

988 posts

170 months

Monday 10th October 2016
quotequote all
On the SEAC the fuel pipes are metal tubes along the sill; the metal tube is bent up into the front wheelach and protected with rubber hose slit lengthways and clamped over the tube. There's then a cover under which the metal tube is connected to conventional rubber hose; the rubber hose then goes though a hole in the inner wing (protected by some edge protector over the GRP) and up to the engine. The cover piece is just a bit of flat plastic sheet bent over the pipes and held in place with self tappers. The whole affair is very close to the tyre on full lock.


440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Monday 10th October 2016
quotequote all
Thanks Martin, that explains it perfectly.

KKson

3,403 posts

125 months

Monday 10th October 2016
quotequote all
440Interceptor said:
Number 7, I assumed the shaft length was fixed rather than telescopic. that would help A LOT!. I hope you're right.

Zig, I'm just thinking high pressure rubber fuel hose is vulnerable to a nail being flicked up of the tyre or similar. I have a 1 inch hole in the top of the wheelarch through which the fuel lines pass on their way to/from the fuel injection unit. So the hoses have to come up the back of the wheelarch rather than going inboard to pass through it? Mine 1984, maybe they changed this later on?
I fitted a bearing kit to the 390 recently and like yours the UJ joint was very tight against the bulk head. I managed to slacken off and find some movement on the two joints heading to the steering rack and then got the steering column shaft to extend further into the wheel arch which gave about 5mm of clearance. A bit of a fiddle but eventually got it all lined up.

440Interceptor

Original Poster:

636 posts

147 months

Monday 10th October 2016
quotequote all
Thanks, how did you get the extra 5mm Keith? Is the column telescopic or not, I guess that's what it boils down to. The car is on a hoist at the mechanics now, so I don't want to ask him to start bashing away unless I know for sure.

Number 7

4,103 posts

262 months

Monday 10th October 2016
quotequote all
I thought all cars built in the last 40 or 50 years had telescopic shafts as a safety features to avoid skerering the driver.