Average speed cameras - Orwell bridge (Ipswich)

Average speed cameras - Orwell bridge (Ipswich)

Author
Discussion

Morningside

Original Poster:

24,110 posts

229 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Are they active yet as I notice some say "Camera not working" ?

Simpo Two

85,422 posts

265 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
It takes a special kind of logic to spend tens of thousands of pounds on a speed camera and then hang a 'Not Working' sign on it.

Better than 'Working' though.

Such cameras are gradually sneaking along the whole A12 - and no-one seems to notice or care or wonder why.

odub

10 posts

102 months

Tuesday 5th April 2016
quotequote all
I don't think they are active yet but there are often police waiting to catch you over 60 mph in the lay-bys either side. I'm not sure what they are trying to achieve as most traffic is doing about 50 mph over the bridge

baptistsan

1,839 posts

210 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/a14...

93 reported collisions and how many down to excessive speed? Would like to see some more details on these 93 collisions.

RedAndy

1,230 posts

154 months

Wednesday 13th April 2016
quotequote all
Logic for them on the bridge is that in heavy traffic, in dark/poor light (twilight) the traffic doing 70 in lane 2 can be caught out by sudden truck movements at 45-55 when another trucker pulls out of the layby on either side of the bridge, or out of the PFS. So if there is a speed limit, the lieklihood and severity of the accidents is greatly reduced.

Installing lights on the bride woudl be my answer, and shutting the laybys, but that's too expensive, and doesnt generate ticket revenue. and apparently the lights would be a distraction and end up in the mass deaths of the wild birds in the estuary, who are not in the least bit bothered by the harbour lights, but would object to bridge lights.

i highlighted t the guy at the drop in session that in rush hour you cant get UP TO 60, let alone limit it there... and in quiet periods the road was designed for 70 so there is no need to limit speed. of course, the Agency knows best wink


texaxile

3,290 posts

150 months

Thursday 14th April 2016
quotequote all
Totally agree.

That Shell garage on the Westbound side couldn't be put in a more ridiculous place if they tried. It's mostly used by Hauliers who have a tough time pulling out into the traffic, which can get very heavy during rush hour with the people comnig off Nacton and heading out.

Also, the half brained fkwitts at the traffic planning dept in Ipswich have very helpfully managed to gridlock the town centre pretty much most of the day, which when the A14 gets closed due to an Orwell bridge incident manages to exacerbate it even more.

Closing the laybays is arguably the best idea I've heard, they don't really get used much but to be honest they probably serve as a conveneint place for the Roadwork crews to park their gear.

All comes down to £££ I think.


12att

16 posts

96 months

Friday 15th April 2016
quotequote all
If what I've heard is right, the intention was for them to be switched on this morning. I'm not 100% sure if they have been though..

Really can't understand the thought behind it at all.. Would some sort of "lorries in lane 1 only" rule like they have in sections of the autobahn not make more sense? That idea still has its flaws, and wouldn't generate any revenue mind...

Mrs Muttleysnoop

1,412 posts

184 months

Saturday 16th April 2016
quotequote all
OH said he heard on the radio a day or so ago that the cameras are now live. I noticed since the 60 limit the traffic bunches up. The other problem in ASC sections is that people see a camera, jam their brakes on and then accelerate.