Anyone gone from Mondeo ST220 to Focus ST 2.5?

Anyone gone from Mondeo ST220 to Focus ST 2.5?

Author
Discussion

sato

Original Poster:

582 posts

212 months

Tuesday 9th October 2007
quotequote all
Has anyone got reasonable experience of both a Mondeo St220 and Focus ST?
Just wandering how they compare, specifically if the Focus is markedly more agile than the Mondeo.

Witchfinder

6,250 posts

253 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Have you driven the Focus ST? I own a 220 and I've test driven two Focus STs now. I thought the Focus felt like it was "holding back", especially in second gear. Of course, it has colossal tuning potential, but only if you're into that kind of thing.

The Mondeo feels larger, more comfortable and better built. The Recaros feel strangely positioned in the Focus, but they feel just right in the Mondeo. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the cloth Recaros suit the Focus better than the leather ones. They're more grippy and feel more snug.

It's horses for courses really. Depends what you want out of your car!

sato

Original Poster:

582 posts

212 months

Thursday 11th October 2007
quotequote all
No, have not driven an ST yet. It will be interesting to see if I notice the holding back you mention as I have driven a V70 T5 a number of times. I'm probably more suited to the ST on paper, but for approx 2/3rds the price, and the absence of the 'yoof' factor, was wondering whether an ST220 is 2/3rds the car.

Pentoman

4,814 posts

264 months

Thursday 11th October 2007
quotequote all
Witchfinder said:
Have you driven the Focus ST? I own a 220 and I've test driven two Focus STs now. I thought the Focus felt like it was "holding back", especially in second gear.
Hmm interesting... this doesn't surprise me. I had a little drag race with a Focus ST a while ago. I was a little surprised to find us dead even through first and second gears - my car possibly pulling very very slightly. However, the moment he hit 3rd gear, he shot off and I was left trailing. I would say the torque is limited in the first 2 gears and the engine doesn't give its all until 3rd. There's probably an easy way to unlock that to make it a bit more rowdy!

Witchfinder

6,250 posts

253 months

Thursday 11th October 2007
quotequote all
Pentoman said:
I would say the torque is limited in the first 2 gears and the engine doesn't give its all until 3rd. There's probably an easy way to unlock that to make it a bit more rowdy!
I believe that is the case - you don't want to light up the tyres every time you floor it. Don't get me wrong, I was hugely impressed with the Focus ST (I'll have an ST-2 in white please, blue side stripes, navigation system and Wolf tuning kit), but the Mondeo is a more grown-up car.

SaliMali

242 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th October 2007
quotequote all
My first impression of the ST was lazy power.It feels well sorted and always feels like it's got power in reserve.Mondeo felt a bit barge like in comparison and doesn't handle as well as the Focus.The ST is my 'family' car and does a great job.I'd buy another one in a second.

NST

1,523 posts

244 months

Thursday 11th October 2007
quotequote all
I thought about getting a Focus ST after my ST220m but after testing driving the new focus i really didn't like the seating position or high CoG which could be felt when cornering. the focus certainly has the better in gear performance and much better 'chuckability', but the mondeo imho had the better top end rush and better pull from tickover in high gears -something that you only get from large capacity engines.
fuel consumption was alittle scarey in the focus..

refinement and high speed crusing imho is better in the mondeo.
two different cars imho, i liked both but if given the option to take one i think i'd take the mondeo.


Dimski

2,099 posts

200 months

Thursday 11th October 2007
quotequote all
Mondeo is excellent for what it is, a bigish saloon or estate.

I would go so far as to say remarkable. It really is good to steer, and yet still has good motorway manners. Granted its firmly sprung but not overly so.

I good friend took me out in a 300ish bhp Focus ST. Wow. Very rapid, and as you say, a different beastie to the Mondeo. Again, I was impressed by its manners. I am sure it is excellent to drive, with great handling, and yet my main thought was that the Focus still felt quite refined, not too stiff. A standard Civic Type R, Impreza P1 and 320bhp Evo 6 feel hardcore (and yes I have been in them), and yet while this ST was a match for any them, it felt comfortable, as well as fast.

As a family workhorse, goto go with the mondeo. Its more spacious, can carry more, has many more toys and is still a great drive.

Sod the family? - Then get the Focus. It can still behave itself on motorways, is better to drive and quicker too.

Its a good choice to have, I dont think you can lose smile

Dave_ST220

10,296 posts

206 months

Thursday 11th October 2007
quotequote all
Choice i had to make about this time last year-went for a fully loaded ST220 saloon as IMO it looks more special smile Drive both and make you choice wink

Witchfinder

6,250 posts

253 months

Friday 12th October 2007
quotequote all
Dave_ST220 said:
Choice i had to make about this time last year-went for a fully loaded ST220 saloon as IMO it looks more special smile Drive both and make you choice wink
Why did you get the saloon over the hatch? Personally, I wanted an estate, but at the time I couldn't find a facelifted one at my budget. Test drove a Performance Blue one with white seats. It looked gorgeous.

Dave_ST220

10,296 posts

206 months

Friday 12th October 2007
quotequote all
Number of reasons, i prefer the way the saloon looks, it's the fastest and best at high speed, i was bored of hatch backs & their rattly parcel shelves! Hatchbacks are common, saloons are not smile









Edited by Dave_ST220 on Friday 12th October 15:33

thekirbyfake

6,232 posts

236 months

Saturday 13th October 2007
quotequote all
NST said:
the mondeo had better pull from tickover in high gears -something that you only get from large capacity engines.
confused

Mondeo 206lbft @ 4,750rpm
Focus 236lbft @ 1,600rpm

SaliMali

242 posts

221 months

Saturday 13th October 2007
quotequote all
NST said:
the mondeo imho had the better top end rush and better pull from tickover in high gears -something that you only get from large capacity engines.
a blown 2.5 litre isn't exactly a small engine smile

NST

1,523 posts

244 months

Monday 15th October 2007
quotequote all
thekirbyfake said:
NST said:
the mondeo had better pull from tickover in high gears -something that you only get from large capacity engines.
confused

Mondeo 206lbft @ 4,750rpm
Focus 236lbft @ 1,600rpm
i'm referring to sub 1000 rpm.. stick the ST220 into 5 or even 6th at sub 1K the engine still pulls which makes driving around town very easy, no need to change gear all the time. the torque curve in the mondeo ST220 is quite flat..

NST

1,523 posts

244 months

Monday 15th October 2007
quotequote all
SaliMali said:
NST said:
the mondeo imho had the better top end rush and better pull from tickover in high gears -something that you only get from large capacity engines.
a blown 2.5 litre isn't exactly a small engine smile
assuming you are referring the ST TDCI engine? which is a 2.2. ST220 is 3L N/A.

smile

thekirbyfake

6,232 posts

236 months

Monday 15th October 2007
quotequote all
NST said:
thekirbyfake said:
NST said:
the mondeo had better pull from tickover in high gears -something that you only get from large capacity engines.
confused

Mondeo 206lbft @ 4,750rpm
Focus 236lbft @ 1,600rpm
i'm referring to sub 1000 rpm.. stick the ST220 into 5 or even 6th at sub 1K the engine still pulls which makes driving around town very easy, no need to change gear all the time. the torque curve in the mondeo ST220 is quite flat..
Sorry of course you're right.

That's one of the real drawbacks in the Focus, not being able to drive round town in 6th gear labouring the engine.
confused

I don't have any data for the ST220 but comparing the 130i and R32 evo got the following figures for in-gear acceleration. I'd wager the 130i and R32 with their "large capacity engine" are quicker than the ST220 which has lower power and lower torque (at higher revs).

30-50mph in 6th
ST 7.2s
130i 7.5
R32 8.6

40-60 in 6th
ST 6.7
130i 6.9
R32 8.3

50-70 in 6th
ST 6.8
130i 7.0
R32 8.2

30-50 in 5th
ST 5.1
130i 5.2
R32 5.8

40-60 in 5th
ST 5.0
130i 5.5
R32 6.1

50-70 in 5th
ST 5.2
130i 5.9
R32 6.8

SaliMali

242 posts

221 months

Monday 15th October 2007
quotequote all
NST said:
SaliMali said:
NST said:
the mondeo imho had the better top end rush and better pull from tickover in high gears -something that you only get from large capacity engines.
a blown 2.5 litre isn't exactly a small engine smile
assuming you are referring the ST TDCI engine? which is a 2.2. ST220 is 3L N/A.

smile
Your assumption is incorrect I'm referring to the engine in the Focus ST.

NST

1,523 posts

244 months

Monday 15th October 2007
quotequote all
SaliMali said:
Your assumption is incorrect I'm referring to the engine in the Focus ST.
yes my mistake! a blown 2.5 isn't exactly a small engine redface)

Jon GT2

356 posts

205 months

Monday 15th October 2007
quotequote all
I own a mapped St Tdci but have had lots of time in these cars ,main reason i dont own a Focus St is fuel consumption other than that it was good to drive and relatively quick i liked the ST220 but went for the diesel as mapped up i prefer the way it delivers the power.Not much in it on handling with a decent driver behind the wheel.

Damian S

95 posts

211 months

Monday 15th October 2007
quotequote all
its pointless comparing turbo'd and NA engines at low revs. A turbo engine running off boost will always feel laboured in comparison, much of this is down to the lower compression ratio.