New TVR still under wraps!

New TVR still under wraps!

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

m4tti

5,427 posts

155 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
It is....... ;-)
But if they're using cosworth won't cosworth want to use Pectel...

m4tti

5,427 posts

155 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Cool. Was just a matter of time before a U.K. based supplier looked into importing these off the shelf bits from the US. There'll be a nice big beefy Tremec Magnum behind it too which makes life much easier! Let's hope that the ECU TVR end up using is something easily accessible by the aftermarket. Oh, and it goes without saying the usual unbeatable Power warranty?
I think GT101 have been doing this for a while, as they're the official whipple dealer/installer, and are the leading outfit for Ford GT's and mustangs.

And reading this on their website... I'm guessing they may be able to do official upgrades..


"GT101 Limited are now part of the official factory TVR network, we will therefore be selling, servicing and supporting the new car. "

http://gt101.co.uk



Edited by m4tti on Thursday 19th January 22:48

Slow M

2,736 posts

206 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Two months to go, people. Get excited!

Best regards,
Bernard.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
m4tti said:
Max_Torque said:
It is....... ;-)
But if they're using cosworth won't cosworth want to use Pectel...
They might want to use a Cosworth Electronics ECU, but they are too expensive, so they are not using one...... (can't tell you what they are using, sorry, as i don't think it's public knowledge yet)

DonkeyApple

55,233 posts

169 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
m4tti said:
Max_Torque said:
It is....... ;-)
But if they're using cosworth won't cosworth want to use Pectel...
They might want to use a Cosworth Electronics ECU, but they are too expensive, so they are not using one...... (can't tell you what they are using, sorry, as i don't think it's public knowledge yet)
It's an interesting aspect of the business model as one of the huge failings of the business last time around was its lack of any control over the huge after market, upgrade revenue. I guess the two main ways to try and retain control is from either locking the owner in via the legal route of the warranty or by leaving cling third party businesses out via electronics? I guess neither are infallible regardless of costs?

But with a plenty supply of aftermarket solutions for the Coyote engine what is the most efficient route to ensure the majority of clients buy their upgrades from TVR?

350Matt

3,737 posts

279 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
the best route is to make it easy and cost effective to go the ' official' route
if they offered say a 50 bhp upgrade pack that came with a calibration and it was more or less the same price as importing the bits yourself then why shop elsewhere?

HarryW

15,150 posts

269 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Max_Torque said:
m4tti said:
Max_Torque said:
It is....... ;-)
But if they're using cosworth won't cosworth want to use Pectel...
They might want to use a Cosworth Electronics ECU, but they are too expensive, so they are not using one...... (can't tell you what they are using, sorry, as i don't think it's public knowledge yet)
It's an interesting aspect of the business model as one of the huge failings of the business last time around was its lack of any control over the huge after market, upgrade revenue. I guess the two main ways to try and retain control is from either locking the owner in via the legal route of the warranty or by leaving cling third party businesses out via electronics? I guess neither are infallible regardless of costs?

But with a plenty supply of aftermarket solutions for the Coyote engine what is the most efficient route to ensure the majority of clients buy their upgrades from TVR?
Agree there is a whole tuning market in the US for the Coyote with some very good results. Assuming the base TVR lump is the higher spec Aluminator package then my assumption is tha Cosworth would have maximised the output for all conditions. Ergo I wouldn't see the need for remapping without mechanical changes.
It's not a simple tweak of the fuel and ignition maps though, when you add independent intake and exhaust timing into the mix it can become almost infinitely variable, early US tuners started to lock off the VVT as it was too complex.

Slightly OT; DA re intake positioning on your Typhon. I spent a lot of time rerouteing to get the intake piping and filter on my old V8S optimised. I attached wires to the AFM output to a voltmeter on the dash so I could see what was happening on the road. I ended up with the filter in the near side void ahead of the wheel arch, silicon hoses and oversized elbow section. The only downside was as the V8S had a front clam shell you had to undo the piping to the AFM to fully lift the bonnet, I put a quick release hose clamp on it. My back to back testing identified about a 5% improvement across the board, fond memories...

DonkeyApple

55,233 posts

169 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
350Matt said:
the best route is to make it easy and cost effective to go the ' official' route
if they offered say a 50 bhp upgrade pack that came with a calibration and it was more or less the same price as importing the bits yourself then why shop elsewhere?
I suspect that's the only true answer. The majority of people would prefer sanctioned & branded upgrades and are only driven elsewhere by cost.

I think the real upgrade revenue will probably come from body panels as much as anything as I think one of the benefits of the istream system is that these are easy to change when you get bored.

Hughesie

12,571 posts

282 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
what is the most efficient route to ensure the majority of clients buy their upgrades from TVR?
Just build it fast as fk in the first place !

Shouldn't need to upgrade then smile

smile

DonkeyApple

55,233 posts

169 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
HarryW said:
Slightly OT; DA re intake positioning on your Typhon. I spent a lot of time rerouteing to get the intake piping and filter on my old V8S optimised. I attached wires to the AFM output to a voltmeter on the dash so I could see what was happening on the road. I ended up with the filter in the near side void ahead of the wheel arch, silicon hoses and oversized elbow section. The only downside was as the V8S had a front clam shell you had to undo the piping to the AFM to fully lift the bonnet, I put a quick release hose clamp on it. My back to back testing identified about a 5% improvement across the board, fond memories...
Mine has a steel box down on the floor just behind the rad with 5 one inch holes down through the flat floor to feed it with air. It's a legacy of the FI as the box originally fed the intercoolers in the wings then on to the engine. What we originally did was just connect two pipes from that box to the engine but when mapping it was clear the engine was hugely short on air.

I didn't want to replicate the race cars and cut a hole in the bonnet so I'd been eyeing the old intercooler brackets for about a year when GM said what he did and convinced me to go ahead. I just put a Cerbera style filter in each void and a big fat pipe from them to the engine. On remapping the increase in air flow was dramatic and much more fuel was able to be fed in at high rpm. Has made a huge difference.

DonkeyApple

55,233 posts

169 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
ChilliWhizz said:
Seriously DA, great article... thumbup
Much appreciated. And Matthew. Glad it was worth reading.

eliot

11,422 posts

254 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
They might want to use a Cosworth Electronics ECU, but they are too expensive, so they are not using one...... (can't tell you what they are using, sorry, as i don't think it's public knowledge yet)
Surely they would stick to the OEM ECU for warranty and avoiding "re-inventing" the wheel.

Bluebottle

3,498 posts

240 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
eliot said:
Max_Torque said:
They might want to use a Cosworth Electronics ECU, but they are too expensive, so they are not using one...... (can't tell you what they are using, sorry, as i don't think it's public knowledge yet)
Surely they would stick to the OEM ECU for warranty and avoiding "re-inventing" the wheel.
If this is true, then this basically blows all the Cosworth BS out the window! as i know the crate engine is untouched (lightened flywheel and bespoke manifold is the only difference) so what are Cosworth doing to warrant their name on the car?

Incognegro

1,560 posts

133 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Matthew Poxon said:
DonkeyApple said:
Hi Aaron. Glad it was firstly, readable and secondly, of interest.

It was thanks to V8GRF who had been asked by TVR if he could source a Typhon for them and GMD to look over and saw fit to ask me if I'd like to help. It was a very interesting day. I'd very briefly met GM back in the early 90s at a McLaren event but never actually had a conversation. I guess I didn't really know what to expect as I arrived at his office but I guess I just thought a couple of TVR people would have a look at the car and that would be it but once the car was taken into one of their garages about a dozen engineers and designers all descended on it. It was really at that point that I realised just how serious this venture is. They have a lot of people working on all aspects down to the finest details and I think while they were totally confident that they could build a car they were investing maximum effort to ensure that car was a true TVR. LE's enthusiasm was also infectious and it is very clear that he understands exactly what a TVR is and that while you cannot build those cars anymore and have to build something for the 21st century it has to carry the DNA.

I still think that it is a mammoth task and that Brexit has probably made it harder still but it was clear to me that they were not fannying about.
I enjoyed your article on the Typhon, very well written and informative. It did make me laugh when you mentioned about TVR breaking the usual British etiquette of not talking to each other. All sounds very positive.
Echoing Matthew I really liked the article and all does sound good.

m4tti

5,427 posts

155 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Bluebottle said:
eliot said:
Max_Torque said:
They might want to use a Cosworth Electronics ECU, but they are too expensive, so they are not using one...... (can't tell you what they are using, sorry, as i don't think it's public knowledge yet)
Surely they would stick to the OEM ECU for warranty and avoiding "re-inventing" the wheel.
If this is true, then this basically blows all the Cosworth BS out the window! as i know the crate engine is untouched (lightened flywheel and bespoke manifold is the only difference) so what are Cosworth doing to warrant their name on the car?
Ford offer a "coyote crate engine control pack", which as mentioned above, even at 55k would make this a horribly expensive way to obtain a Ford engine and ecu.

The so called cosworth video with Les beaming over the engine on the dyno as it supposedly was put through a simulated load of a well known track (from memory) was an MBE screen. So still not really cutting edge.

For example the Noble M600 runs a motec. But it's sounding ominously like they'll be using nothing too glamorous from the above post.

Slow M

2,736 posts

206 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
What point is there to having a "glamorous" ECU, if there is no performance advantage? There is tuning, that can be done, with the Ford computer, that negates having to raise the build cost.

As for warranty issues, I hope they will be as uptight as Apple, when it comes to allowing unauthorized fingers to perform work.

Best regards,
Bernard.

m4tti

5,427 posts

155 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Slow M said:
What point is there to having a "glamorous" ECU, if there is no performance advantage? There is tuning, that can be done, with the Ford computer, that negates having to raise the build cost.

As for warranty issues, I hope they will be as uptight as Apple, when it comes to allowing unauthorized fingers to perform work.

Best regards,
Bernard.
Because they'll then need to start buying in stand alone traction control.

dvs_dave

8,618 posts

225 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
m4tti said:
Max_Torque said:
It is....... ;-)
But if they're using cosworth won't cosworth want to use Pectel...
They might want to use a Cosworth Electronics ECU, but they are too expensive, so they are not using one...... (can't tell you what they are using, sorry, as i don't think it's public knowledge yet)
Well it has to be something that can do VVT, so if it's not the OEM Ford unit (perfectly acceptable in my book), then it's probably not an MBE as a quick look suggests that none of their crate products at least can do vvt.
Syvecs, Megasquirt, AEM, Holley....?

essexstu

Original Poster:

519 posts

118 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
IF the new car is £85-90k I would have to look at alternatives and a 700 bhp Mustang with the supercharger for under £50k is going to be quick sorted car for £35-40k less which is a lot of money to save! I know its not carbon fibre etc but still, performance wise they wont be far apart.

BJWoods

5,015 posts

284 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
9 pages of retrospective TVR in Autocar......

..so marketing/profile raising strategy beginning to ramp up..?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED