Jensen Interceptor - scratch needs itching!
Discussion
dpp said:
If the urge takes you then do it, the only downside to these fantastic cars is the damage to your bank balance.
Owning a Jensen for me has been a very rewarding experience the club and other owners are a great bunch and I have had a great time restoring a wreck.
My advise buy the worst you can and then rip it apart to make a car you know exactly the condition of.
I bought a car and the welder did this for starters
2 years later and Im now through the worst and have this which I am looking forward to using next year when its finished
Wow, I really like that colour, more pictures and a thread are needed! Owning a Jensen for me has been a very rewarding experience the club and other owners are a great bunch and I have had a great time restoring a wreck.
My advise buy the worst you can and then rip it apart to make a car you know exactly the condition of.
I bought a car and the welder did this for starters
2 years later and Im now through the worst and have this which I am looking forward to using next year when its finished
My advice would be just do it! I've had my Mk 1 for about 7 years now, and it has been brilliant - in fact I was driving it just last night & this morning and it always makes me smile. Weirdly, even though I used to (and often still do) commute in it, in London traffic, it always makes me feel calm driving it - power steering that is perfectly weighted, servo brakes, amazing visibility and spacious cabin, oodles of comfort, and the torqueflight box where you don't even notice the gear change. And then there is the power - it will burble happily, but even if you just press slightly it will push you effortlessly, and if you boot it then whoa! I always describe the power as if you are on a plane taking off - the acceleration doesn't feel much, but it is unlimited and actually remarkably quick.
As people have mentioned before there are a few wise updates, I've upgraded to a high torque starter (starts first crank every time, even after being sat for months), electric fuel pump, electronic ignition, alternator. And Andy at Appleyards is a star (he also used to own my car)
I'd go for the Mk 1, as they look the prettiest internally and externally (IMHO), they are also the lightest and feel the quickest (maybe are?), but they are quite rare now compared to the later models so command a premium price.
I keep thinking I should sell mine, as it only now gets used once or twice a month, but each time I drive it I change my mind!
Good luck with the search, and you won't regret it!
Joe
As people have mentioned before there are a few wise updates, I've upgraded to a high torque starter (starts first crank every time, even after being sat for months), electric fuel pump, electronic ignition, alternator. And Andy at Appleyards is a star (he also used to own my car)
I'd go for the Mk 1, as they look the prettiest internally and externally (IMHO), they are also the lightest and feel the quickest (maybe are?), but they are quite rare now compared to the later models so command a premium price.
I keep thinking I should sell mine, as it only now gets used once or twice a month, but each time I drive it I change my mind!
Good luck with the search, and you won't regret it!
Joe
What a lovely car. The paintwork looks spiffy. The interior of a Mark I is very Italianate and classy, although I like the "Federal" dashboard of the Mark II and III, which no doubt looked very modern in 1969.
I assume you have the whacky rear window fans, and the slightly thinner wheels.
I assume you have the whacky rear window fans, and the slightly thinner wheels.
CoinSl0t said:
Wow, I really like that colour, more pictures and a thread are needed!
Thanks there isn't a thread running on pistonheads but you can follow this link to a thread on the restoration on the JOC website if you have a spare hour.http://www.joc.org.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=17&am...
vixen1700 said:
Keep it stiff said:
V8 Fettler said:
Did some poor bugger have to write the risk assessment for that?
I'm not sure about a RA but I'm sure they would have written a report or two after!I remember watching it at the time, this You Tube clip is an edit, this was a live TV event and the image I remember most was the engine & box from the Interceptor bouncing down the tarmac without the rest of the car. Very much a stunt that went wrong and given the near-miss with the first car that ran all the more surprising that alarm bells had not rung.
vixen1700 said:
Keep it stiff said:
SV8Predator said:
Breadvan72 said:
although I like the "Federal" dashboard of the Mark II and III,
That's interesting Breaders, I've never heard it referred to as "Federal" before. Where did that come from?storminnorman said:
vixen1700 said:
Keep it stiff said:
I have always regarded the mk II and III dash as a Federal thing too. I'm beginning to wonder why I do now. Perhaps it is a long held (and wrong) assumption which has gained the status of "fact" for me! Perhaps it was introduced early in anticipation of regulatory changes in the USA?
The original dash is a classy looking thing, but I prefer the space age later one. It suits the car. The late walnut job looks posh, but oddly, I'm not so keen on it. It's all relative - any Interceptor is beautiful.
The original dash is a classy looking thing, but I prefer the space age later one. It suits the car. The late walnut job looks posh, but oddly, I'm not so keen on it. It's all relative - any Interceptor is beautiful.
Edited by dbdb on Monday 16th December 22:55
SV8Predator said:
Breadvan72 said:
From the Goshdarn' Fed'ral Gummint. The dashboard was redesigned to conform to new US crash regulations. It is padded and does not have switches sticking out of it.
But the Interceptor II was introduced in 1969.Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 17th December 07:51
Motor Magazine (UK) Oct 1969 - "New 'American safety' dashboard - and a collapsible steering column."
Road and Track (US) April 1970 - "The interior layout, restyled for 1970 around federalizing redesign..."
Motor Magazine (UK) September 1970 - "Yet to meet the ever tightening American Federal Regulations... Jensen were obliged to bring out a revised version of the FF at last year's London show... Most of the changes - which have also been built into the FF's stable mate, the Interceptor - are to the interior styling and safety, like the facia padding and collapsible steering column."
Road and Track (US) April 1970 - "The interior layout, restyled for 1970 around federalizing redesign..."
Motor Magazine (UK) September 1970 - "Yet to meet the ever tightening American Federal Regulations... Jensen were obliged to bring out a revised version of the FF at last year's London show... Most of the changes - which have also been built into the FF's stable mate, the Interceptor - are to the interior styling and safety, like the facia padding and collapsible steering column."
Breadvan72 said:
had incorrectly assumed that open cars were to be banned on the grounds of OMGROLLOVERDEATHKAOS, as product liability litigation in the US started to become a national hobby.
...and the reason why the Stag was engineered with its T-bar setup, as Triumph believed they would be banned, and the T-Bar was supposed to get around that.Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff