COOL CLASSIC CAR SPOTTERS POST!!! Vol 2

COOL CLASSIC CAR SPOTTERS POST!!! Vol 2

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

TR4man

5,226 posts

174 months

Friday 24th February 2017
quotequote all
NigelStn said:
I believe to fit a GT6 engine in a Spitfire the GT6 bonnet was required as well to clear the 6 pot rocker cover
I think you are right and that looks a standard Spitty bonnet.

The meaty exhausts could just be the old Triumphtune twin pipe set up which can be fitted to the standard engine.

Brads67

3,199 posts

98 months

Friday 24th February 2017
quotequote all
Plinth said:
XR6 cloud9

Is that a Mk2 Granada in the background? (or should I get better reading glasses?)
Yup sure is !

Like some Ford freaks heaven in his place

RESSE

5,701 posts

221 months

Friday 24th February 2017
quotequote all
Spotted in the car park if my local this afternoon:


CRA1G

6,530 posts

195 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
RESSE said:
Spotted in the car park if my local this afternoon:

That is the case of the spoiler spoiling imo..!

4rephill

5,040 posts

178 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
CRA1G said:
RESSE said:
Spotted in the car park if my local this afternoon:

That is the case of the spoiler spoiling imo..!
Never liked the cabriolet - It's like a Baur BMW, they just don't look right to Me.


The XJS convertible on the other hand, is a different matter!

Plinth

713 posts

88 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
RESSE said:
Spotted in the car park if my local this afternoon:

Good spot - lovely car cloud9

Looks very elegant next to that insipid Euro-blob next to it (Astra? Modern crap all looks the same to me...)

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

163 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
4rephill said:
CRA1G said:
RESSE said:
Spotted in the car park if my local this afternoon:

That is the case of the spoiler spoiling imo..!
Never liked the cabriolet - It's like a Baur BMW, they just don't look right to Me.


The XJS convertible on the other hand, is a different matter!
Agreed,cabriolet was just weird.

gforceg

3,524 posts

179 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
lucido grigio said:
4rephill said:
CRA1G said:
RESSE said:
Spotted in the car park if my local this afternoon:

That is the case of the spoiler spoiling imo..!
Never liked the cabriolet - It's like a Baur BMW, they just don't look right to Me.


The XJS convertible on the other hand, is a different matter!
Agreed,cabriolet was just weird.
Yep, it's a BIG WHY? from me too.

Doofus

25,807 posts

173 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
gforceg said:
Yep, it's a BIG WHY? from me too.
Because BL still feared that the US would ban convertibles, as they'd been threatening to do since the mid-70s. The Cabriolet retained adequate rollover protecton to enable it to get federal approval and to be sold in the USA (a market BL had been chasing - with varying success - for many years).

By the time it was launched, the threat had all but gone away, so the full convertible XJS was developed and released five years later.


Bob CD

246 posts

156 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
Nice explanation about why a convertible and not a cabriolet but would someone just define the difference between the two? I once asked a well respected classics magazine but reply came there none. Did they not know, or just think it was a dumb question, which it might well be... Incidentally, I'm not just thinking of relatively modern examples such as that discussed but post-, even pre-war examples. Thanks

gforceg

3,524 posts

179 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
Doofus said:
gforceg said:
Yep, it's a BIG WHY? from me too.
Because BL still feared that the US would ban convertibles, as they'd been threatening to do since the mid-70s. The Cabriolet retained adequate rollover protecton to enable it to get federal approval and to be sold in the USA (a market BL had been chasing - with varying success - for many years).

By the time it was launched, the threat had all but gone away, so the full convertible XJS was developed and released five years later.
Ahem, have a look at the reg number.

RATATTAK

10,998 posts

189 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
Bob CD said:
Nice explanation about why a convertible and not a cabriolet but would someone just define the difference between the two? I once asked a well respected classics magazine but reply came there none. Did they not know, or just think it was a dumb question, which it might well be... Incidentally, I'm not just thinking of relatively modern examples such as that discussed but post-, even pre-war examples. Thanks
LMGTFY

Convertible and Cabriolet what’s the difference?
Convertible or Cabriolet?
What is the difference between a convertible and a cabriolet? The truth is, very little. The words generally have the same meaning but come from rather different routes. Whereas Roadster is a more specific term (generally referring to a small, lightweight two seater sports car), both Convertible and Cabriolet are currently used in more general terms for a car with a removable roof.
Purists may claim that both phrases only refer to cars with four seats that originate from fixed roof cars. However, there have been so many exceptions to this rule that they seem better suited as general terms.
Since the advent of the automobile the words convertible and cabriolet have become interchangeable. Manufacturers in America have generally kept to using ‘convertible’ while European brands (French in particular) often prefer to use ‘cabriolet’. Contradicting examples can be found in German brands where BMW use Convertible while Audi prefer Cabriolet. Brands such as Jaguar and Mercedes have been known to use both terms for their cars.
The word Convertible seems to have more recent origins and is only used for motor cars. The phrase simply means ‘to-convert’ referring to the fact that the car can be converted from a vehicle with a roof to one without. Today both words are widely used with ‘Convertible’ being the more popular by a small margin.
Cabriolet on the other hand is a French word first used in the 18th century originally referring to a light horse-drawn carriage. A Cabriolet would have two wheels and a folding fabric hood that could be pulled up to protect two occupants (one being the driver) from the weather. It would be pulled by a single horse. The name is thought to derive from cabriole (a French term for a dance-like high kicking classical horse movement) because of the vehicle’s light, bouncing motion.
Interestingly, before the automobile was invented, Cabriolet’s were often used as taxis for hire and the word was was often shortened to ‘Cab’ thus being the source of the phrase ‘taxi cab’ or ‘hackney cab’. When referring to convertible cars, Cabriolet is more likely to be shortened to ‘Cabrio’.
The name Roadster also dates back to the early days of motoring when it was used to describe a stripped-down two-seater style of coachwork mostly used for racing. The phrase became commonly used for simple lightweight sports cars without a fixed roof. Some roadsters have convertible tops while others have no weather protection at all. Roadster is also closely related to the term ‘Speedster’. If there is any difference between the two then a Speedster is more likely to have a smaller cut-down windscreen.
Spyder or Spider is a name with Italian roots (shortened from spider phaeton – a light open carridge) and is again used for a two seat sports car with a removable roof. A Spyder is often a lightened version of a standard Roadster model but the name has been used broadley by several manufacturers.

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

163 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
Good info above ,where does that leave "barchetta "?

I'll say it is also closely related to roadster but was it first used by Sr Ferrari for his

road racing sportscars that also had a cut down windscreen and no weather protection.

Barchetta literal translation is "little boat".

Doofus

25,807 posts

173 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
gforceg said:
Ahem, have a look at the reg number.
So have I got to do my own whoosh then?

Honestly. This place is going to the dogs.... paperbag

Doofus

25,807 posts

173 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
Bob CD said:
Nice explanation about why a convertible and not a cabriolet but would someone just define the difference between the two? I once asked a well respected classics magazine but reply came there none. Did they not know, or just think it was a dumb question, which it might well be... Incidentally, I'm not just thinking of relatively modern examples such as that discussed but post-, even pre-war examples. Thanks
My personal interpetation tends to be that a convertible has a fold down roof, and a cabriolet does the same, but with a permanent 'frame' (Triumph Stag, Ford Escort MkIII, theXJS above). A roadster has no roof, or a much lighter roof than a convertible (think Jaguar XKs OTS vs Drophead).

Barchetta, Spider, Spyder et al tend to be marketing designations rather than 'definitions'.

All this is my take, I'm not claiming any of it as irrefutable.

TR4man

5,226 posts

174 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
Seen coming out of South Mimms services yesterday lunchtime.

Obviously a hot rod, no idea what powered it but it sounded glorious.


TR4man

5,226 posts

174 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
As we drove southbound on the M1 near Bedford yesterday, I asked my youngest daughter if she could take a photo of the car in the inside lane as we overtook it....







To me, a car always associated with the late Alan Clark.

TR4man

5,226 posts

174 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
CRA1G said:
RESSE said:
Spotted in the car park if my local this afternoon:

That is the case of the spoiler spoiling imo..!
Yes, I agree that the spoiler does it no favours.

Neither does the fact that (according to it's MOT history) it has been converted to run on LPG.... yikes

Roy C

4,187 posts

284 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
TR4man said:
Seen coming out of South Mimms services yesterday lunchtime.

Obviously a hot rod, no idea what powered it but it sounded glorious.

DVLA says first registered 1931, so it seems to be based on a genuine late Ford Model A.

Engine listed as 5000cc (so it could be a Flathead?).

https://www.flickr.com/photos/boblovelockflickr/78...

nicanary

9,793 posts

146 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
Roy C said:
TR4man said:
Seen coming out of South Mimms services yesterday lunchtime.

Obviously a hot rod, no idea what powered it but it sounded glorious.

DVLA says first registered 1931, so it seems to be based on a genuine late Ford Model A.

Engine listed as 5000cc (so it could be a Flathead?).

https://www.flickr.com/photos/boblovelockflickr/78...
Registration plate is for 1963.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED