Help identifying a strange little car

Help identifying a strange little car

Author
Discussion

FourWheelDrift

88,656 posts

285 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
Did they have Photoshop in the 1950s?
Yes, scissors v1.4 and glue v3.

markCSC

2,987 posts

216 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
Something else it looks like but isn't frown
Lancia Appia GTE



CYMR0

3,940 posts

201 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
It also looks like a Wartburg of some kind, but I can't find one that matches exactly.

marshalla

15,902 posts

202 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
Can we all agree that there are lots that look "about right" for the rear half, but the troublesome areas are the proximity of the A pillar to the front wheel arch, and the steep slope on the bonnet ?

markCSC

2,987 posts

216 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
The slope on the bonnet makes me think rear engined but I still can't think of anything that matches it

nicanary

9,820 posts

147 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Clutching at straws time... I've just seen this on an image site, it's a Jowett Jupiter bodied by Coachcraft of Egham.


Cunning Punt

486 posts

154 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
nicanary said:
Clutching at straws time... I've just seen this on an image site, it's a Jowett Jupiter bodied by Coachcraft of Egham.

My first reaction was to say that that's miles off, but looking closer it's actually not too bad a shout. Square off the rear arches and channel the roof, and it's in the ballpark. Still not right though ranting


NomduJour said:
As said before, my money is on a special built on a Panhard Dyna.
I'll agree with that. With the front end perhaps inspired by the above '57 Pininfarina concept.

If it is a one-off, this photo may well be the only surviving evidence of it.



anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
I think the only thing that stands out to me is the line of the top of the door window. The top of the window is noticeably curved, as the roof line drops away quite suddenly.

If you can find a car with a curved top to the side windows, then we might be closer to identifying it?

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 26th August 2014
quotequote all
marshalla said:
Can we all agree that there are lots that look "about right" for the rear half, but the troublesome areas are the proximity of the A pillar to the front wheel arch, and the steep slope on the bonnet ?
Those are the troublesome areas if we assume this is a re-bodied special.

If not then the distance that the roof-line extends above the top of the windscreen is unusual, and very few cars match the front end e.g. bonnet scoop and flat nose.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 26th August 2014
quotequote all
Just thinking about the possibility of it being rear engined, the Renault Dauphine (and it's predecessor the 4CV) inspired a number of coachbuilt specials e.g.

Chapron Dauphine:



Varela R Dauphine:



The troublesome A pillar fits well, though the overall shape isn't a good match.

lickatysplit

470 posts

131 months

Tuesday 26th August 2014
quotequote all
is it a volvo 123?

Dr Interceptor

7,813 posts

197 months

Tuesday 26th August 2014
quotequote all
lickatysplit said:
is it a volvo 123?
No...

Cunning Punt

486 posts

154 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Another day, another thing it isn't:





MEP Daphné. 7 built, 3 photographed, 1 known survivor (in the pic), and the story goes that Fangio helped out with prototype testing. Apparently at least one was customised by the coachbuilder, by customer request. It's therefore ever so tempting to suggest that one of the others might have had a much shorter bonnet, a square rear arch...well, ok. But a shorter wheelbase?

Wishful thinking is pernicious.

Such a frustrating thread!



Fastdruid

8,675 posts

153 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
IMO that's the closest by far for the features, they're just proportioned a bit wrong.

I wonder if there was a smaller version produced as well (maybe just a prototype).

Fastdruid

8,675 posts

153 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Although if you combine this


and this


You get our strange little car so I wonder if it was a Daphne.

Cunning Punt

486 posts

154 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
Although if you combine this and this you get our strange little car
No. I wish that were true, believe me, but I'm afraid it just isn't. Look again at my picture of the red Daphné compared to your picture of the red Daphné - it's the same car, Daphné 7 001, the surviving example. The angle of your photo makes the front wheels look almost aligned with the A-pillar, my photo shows that in reality they are anything but. The wheelbase is way out compared to the mystery car.

As for "a smaller prototype"...well, there's that tempting wishful thinking again. It doesn't wash. You've got Maurice Pezous, who is an engineer first and a businessman second. He runs one of the biggest and most prestigious Citroën dealerships in France at the time. He's not fabulously wealthy but he's doing ok, and he's a proper petrolhead who takes advantage of his position to get Citroën parts. Apart from building the few Daphné 7s based on a Citroën platform, which he sells at a loss (his daughter said of the Daphné: "sometimes when you're truly passionate about something, making a profit is the last thing you think about. Dad only sold them because he had no choice, otherwise he'd have kept them"), he also builds single seater race cars, and once again sells them at near-zero margins so that local kids can go racing. He puts Citroën engines in his race cars. This man likes Citroën, and he's got ready access to Citroën bits. So why build a smaller prototype for future Citroën-based cars using what appears to be either a rear-engined Renault chassis or a Panhard boxer engine?

Your first photo is interesting because it shows one of the customised Daphnés (002 I think?) with the square rear arch, which I hadn't seen before, and is another element that points to our mystery car "possibly being a Daphné". Or at least created in the same workshop. The trouble is you've then got to look at Albert Mazel, who was apparently a damned fine coachbuilder - a genius by some accounts - which would explain why he was an inevitable choice for Pezous, who's seeking perfection and no doubt doing some pretty furious man-maths to justify the cost. The Daphné 7 was a gorgeous little car, built by a craftsman with an artists's eye for proportion who was at the top of his game. Our mystery car, whatever else it may be, does not appear to be that (...and I really hope I won't end up eating those words)

I posted the Daphné 7 because I didn't know about it before and thought it might be of interest, and because I'm hoping it might remind someone of some other car that's even closer, but I'm about 90% sure we're not looking at a Daphné. Not even a prototype.

A shonky copy of a Daphné built on the wrong platform, maybe smile




maxmaz

1 posts

116 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
The red model is MEP DAPHNE 007 n°1, the only remaining one.
You can have a look at the website with all the relevant information.
Don't hesitate to ask in case you need further elements.
www.mep-daphne.fr

CooperD

2,878 posts

178 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
Might it be a Salmson 2300??


ManFromDelmonte

2,742 posts

181 months

Wednesday 5th November 2014
quotequote all
CooperD said:
Might it be a Salmson 2300??
That looks really really close. The grill looks different but that could be due to damage on the mystery car.