Bonhams in the do-do?

Author
Discussion

9.3

Original Poster:

1,134 posts

193 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all

Iva Barchetta

44,044 posts

164 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
The only winners will be the lawyers once they've spent ages untangling who has/had title.

2 daughters of deceased blokes fighting over it.

v8250

2,724 posts

212 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
Iva Barchetta said:
The only winners will be the lawyers once they've spent ages untangling who has/had title.

2 daughters of deceased blokes fighting over it.
Saucer of milk, table two...

This case/dispute has been known for some years now, though the Bonhams association and potential loss could be interesting.

http://www.gatsbyonline.com/main.aspx?page=text&am...

williamp

19,279 posts

274 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
If the ownership dispute has been known about for years, how can bonhams sell it? I expect this is central to the legal but.

Im sure pretentious expensive auction watch monthly....sorry octane magazine featured this car earlier this year. I cant remember what they said on ownership, but remember it as beng complex

RobinOakapple

2,802 posts

113 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
When they say "he and his daughter spent some £637,500 restoring the chassis" is that classic car speak for building a new car on the old chassis?


marshalla

15,902 posts

202 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
RobinOakapple said:
When they say "he and his daughter spent some £637,500 restoring the chassis" is that classic car speak for building a new car on the old chassis?
Sounds more like building a new car and riveting on the old VIN plate.


v8250

2,724 posts

212 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all

rallycross

12,845 posts

238 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
v8250 said:
A nasty case of greed from all parties concerned.

williamp

19,279 posts

274 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
marshalla said:
RobinOakapple said:
When they say "he and his daughter spent some £637,500 restoring the chassis" is that classic car speak for building a new car on the old chassis?
Sounds more like building a new car and riveting on the old VIN plate.
See the jaguar d type thread for other examples...

a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
williamp said:
marshalla said:
RobinOakapple said:
When they say "he and his daughter spent some £637,500 restoring the chassis" is that classic car speak for building a new car on the old chassis?
Sounds more like building a new car and riveting on the old VIN plate.
See the jaguar d type thread for other examples...
Wow, did someone find the original VIN plate then? biglaugh

pacoryan

671 posts

232 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
Erm am I being thick? Car is sold to Geezer C who finds out that daughter of Geezer A thinks Geezer B didn't own it, so his daughter doesn't either. High Court judge tells her to stop clutching at straws, and Geezer B was the rightful owner and this has passed to his daughter.

Geezer C is thus buying a car from someone who the High Court has declared is fine to be selling it. What is his claim against Bonhams exactly? (where is his loss?)

Or has he caught a massive cold and is thinking a few hundred k of legal fees might be a good bet against buying a £10m sportscar at the height of the market?

Jagmanv12

1,573 posts

165 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
So who entered it in the Bonhams auction? Swaters daughter?

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
Dodgy foreigners, the super rich, property values, and lingerie models - this story is Daily Mail Nirvana! Pity there's no paedos or Mooooooooooooozeleeems, but you can't have everything.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
The Mail have cocked up the narrative as usual. The real story is set out in Mr Justice Flaux's entertaining judgment, which features a splendid cast of colourful characters. Two of my colleagues in chambers acted for Bonhams in the case, so they may be in the market for some fancy cars.

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/c...

v8250

2,724 posts

212 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
from bonham's auction bluuuuuuuuurb...

>>The situation between Jacques Swaters and Kristine Kleve and her American advisors ebbed and flowed during this period, becoming a legal dispute in 2010. Jacques Swaters – himself a towering figure within the Ferrari world – died that December, and '0384 AM' was inherited by his daughter Florence.

She invited Bonhams to assist, in part to help mediate between the Belgian and American parties and – if litigation could be settled – to sell the car by auction for mutual benefit. As in several other instances over many years, Bonhams has been successful in bringing these parties together.<<

http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/21906/lot/320/

williamp

19,279 posts

274 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
The Mail have cocked up the narrative as usual. The real story is set out in Mr Justice Flaux's entertaining judgment, which features a splendid cast of colourful characters. Two of my colleagues in chambers acted for Bonhams in the case, so they may be in the market for some fancy cars.

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/c...
According to that, the car is in a container, in southampton.. so a shipping container at the port. £10mil worth. Anyone fancy having a look?

marshalla

15,902 posts

202 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
williamp said:
According to that, the car is in a container, in southampton.. so a shipping container at the port. £10mil worth. Anyone fancy having a look?
Since June 2014 ? I suspect it won't be looking fully restored any more.

tumble dryer

2,025 posts

128 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Dodgy foreigners, the super rich, property values, and lingerie models - this story is Daily Mail Nirvana! Pity there's no paedos or Mooooooooooooozeleeems, but you can't have everything.
rofl

bltamil1

299 posts

145 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
pacoryan said:
Erm am I being thick? Car is sold to Geezer C who finds out that daughter of Geezer A thinks Geezer B didn't own it, so his daughter doesn't either. High Court judge tells her to stop clutching at straws, and Geezer B was the rightful owner and this has passed to his daughter.

Geezer C is thus buying a car from someone who the High Court has declared is fine to be selling it. What is his claim against Bonhams exactly? (where is his loss?)

Or has he caught a massive cold and is thinking a few hundred k of legal fees might be a good bet against buying a £10m sportscar at the height of the market?
You and me both! Who enter the car into the auction? That seems to be the most salient fact, and of course it isn't even mentioned in the article!

theadman

552 posts

158 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
marshalla said:
williamp said:
According to that, the car is in a container, in southampton.. so a shipping container at the port. £10mil worth. Anyone fancy having a look?
Since June 2014 ? I suspect it won't be looking fully restored any more.
Don't worry, it will be up for sale as an amazing barn find before you know it!!