Classic Cars that Disappointed

Author
Discussion

jith

2,752 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
stuartmmcfc said:
williamp said:
Having owned lots of classics, my first was my most dissappointing:



Bought it in 95, learnt to drive in it. I could have bought the MG magnette ZB, or the Vitesse which I looked at. But Oh no, I thought I knew better. I wanted this Rover. Why?? Front bench seat. So the laydeez could slide accross and cuddle upto me whilst I drive like in the movies, see?? guaranteed to add romance to any teenage date....

The omly problem was, women have taste, and this was the 90s. Could I even get a woman to set foot in the car??? Could I F**K
Do you honestly think the cat was the only problem wink
You beat me to it stuart. There is actually no easy way to say this william, so I'll be frank. Lose the trainers, shorts, ankle socks and baggy top and you will have much greater success with the fairer sex. The Rover is lovely.

J

williamp

19,256 posts

273 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
jith said:
stuartmmcfc said:
williamp said:
Having owned lots of classics, my first was my most dissappointing:



Bought it in 95, learnt to drive in it. I could have bought the MG magnette ZB, or the Vitesse which I looked at. But Oh no, I thought I knew better. I wanted this Rover. Why?? Front bench seat. So the laydeez could slide accross and cuddle upto me whilst I drive like in the movies, see?? guaranteed to add romance to any teenage date....

The omly problem was, women have taste, and this was the 90s. Could I even get a woman to set foot in the car??? Could I F**K
Do you honestly think the cat was the only problem wink
You beat me to it stuart. There is actually no easy way to say this william, so I'll be frank. Lose the trainers, shorts, ankle socks and baggy top and you will have much greater success with the fairer sex. The Rover is lovely.

J
Like I said, that was 1995. I was 17. It was meant to be a fun response. fk you for making it so personal.

Fane

1,309 posts

200 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
I think it was just a gentle dig at 90's fashion rather than you personally.

Pistom

4,967 posts

159 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
Several E-types. Lifeless steering, shonky suspension, wooden brakes.

Stick them in a museum and at least you can pretend they are something they are not.

I don't suppose they were ever about the driving experience and as for doing 150mph, I doff my hat to anyone who has taken one over 100. By that speed, the front end goes light and keeping in a straight line is a battle.


jith

2,752 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
williamp said:
jith said:
stuartmmcfc said:
williamp said:
Having owned lots of classics, my first was my most dissappointing:



Bought it in 95, learnt to drive in it. I could have bought the MG magnette ZB, or the Vitesse which I looked at. But Oh no, I thought I knew better. I wanted this Rover. Why?? Front bench seat. So the laydeez could slide accross and cuddle upto me whilst I drive like in the movies, see?? guaranteed to add romance to any teenage date....

The omly problem was, women have taste, and this was the 90s. Could I even get a woman to set foot in the car??? Could I F**K
Do you honestly think the cat was the only problem wink
You beat me to it stuart. There is actually no easy way to say this william, so I'll be frank. Lose the trainers, shorts, ankle socks and baggy top and you will have much greater success with the fairer sex. The Rover is lovely.

J
Like I said, that was 1995. I was 17. It was meant to be a fun response. fk you for making it so personal.
Charming. It was clearly meant to be a joke. I'll avoid you in future. Can I suggest you chill out a bit.

J

80quattro

1,725 posts

195 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
jith said:
williamp said:
jith said:
stuartmmcfc said:
williamp said:
Having owned lots of classics, my first was my most dissappointing:



Bought it in 95, learnt to drive in it. I could have bought the MG magnette ZB, or the Vitesse which I looked at. But Oh no, I thought I knew better. I wanted this Rover. Why?? Front bench seat. So the laydeez could slide accross and cuddle upto me whilst I drive like in the movies, see?? guaranteed to add romance to any teenage date....

The omly problem was, women have taste, and this was the 90s. Could I even get a woman to set foot in the car??? Could I F**K
Do you honestly think the cat was the only problem wink
You beat me to it stuart. There is actually no easy way to say this william, so I'll be frank. Lose the trainers, shorts, ankle socks and baggy top and you will have much greater success with the fairer sex. The Rover is lovely.

J
Like I said, that was 1995. I was 17. It was meant to be a fun response. fk you for making it so personal.
Charming. It was clearly meant to be a joke. I'll avoid you in future. Can I suggest you chill out a bit.

J
Bit lively for CC&YH ! biggrin

DavidJG

3,536 posts

132 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
My first drive in a TR6 was probably the biggest disappointment. I'd got a lightly modified GT6 at the time, and went see a mis-advertised TR6. It was advertised as the 150bhp fuel injected car. It wasn't, but I didn't open the bonnet before the test drive. The carb fed engine actually had less power than my modded GT6, in a bigger, heavier car.

A little while later I got an injected TR6, which was a much more responsive motor, especially after I'd made a few mods to that too.

Legacywr

12,125 posts

188 months

Saturday 24th September 2016
quotequote all
Alfa GTV6!

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

132 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
Classic vehicles can have character which is missing from most modern cars, Series Land Rovers being an example.

There's also the challenge of getting the thing started.

vixen1700

22,899 posts

270 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
jith said:
TVR, ANY MODEL. As a motor engineer I have never been able to take any TVR seriously as the build quality is just atrocious.
I've never driven a TVR that has left me dissapointed. biggrin

You take the build quality as given, some are better than others.

4rephill

5,040 posts

178 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
stuartmmcfc said:
williamp said:
Having owned lots of classics, my first was my most dissappointing:



Bought it in 95, learnt to drive in it. I could have bought the MG magnette ZB, or the Vitesse which I looked at. But Oh no, I thought I knew better. I wanted this Rover. Why?? Front bench seat. So the laydeez could slide accross and cuddle upto me whilst I drive like in the movies, see?? guaranteed to add romance to any teenage date....

The omly problem was, women have taste, and this was the 90s. Could I even get a woman to set foot in the car??? Could I F**K
Do you honestly think the cat was the only problem wink
What the Hell did the cat have to do with anything? confused

Riley Blue

20,953 posts

226 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
4rephill said:
stuartmmcfc said:
williamp said:
Having owned lots of classics, my first was my most dissappointing:



Bought it in 95, learnt to drive in it. I could have bought the MG magnette ZB, or the Vitesse which I looked at. But Oh no, I thought I knew better. I wanted this Rover. Why?? Front bench seat. So the laydeez could slide accross and cuddle upto me whilst I drive like in the movies, see?? guaranteed to add romance to any teenage date....

The omly problem was, women have taste, and this was the 90s. Could I even get a woman to set foot in the car??? Could I F**K
Do you honestly think the cat was the only problem wink
What the Hell did the cat have to do with anything? confused
He was after pussy...

the pips

187 posts

139 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
Nissan 300ZX. Went to view a twin turbo model but it had already gone but the dealers had another which I drove. I had no idea that they produced a N/A version! All the show but no go.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
I'd say of the cars I've driven the biggest change modern cars have is v older cars brilliant brakes it's night and day.


Golf G60 IMHO was hardly any faster than he superb GTI 16v.

ChasW

2,135 posts

202 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
williamp said:
jith said:
stuartmmcfc said:
williamp said:
Having owned lots of classics, my first was my most dissappointing:



Bought it in 95, learnt to drive in it. I could have bought the MG magnette ZB, or the Vitesse which I looked at. But Oh no, I thought I knew better. I wanted this Rover. Why?? Front bench seat. So the laydeez could slide accross and cuddle upto me whilst I drive like in the movies, see?? guaranteed to add romance to any teenage date....

The omly problem was, women have taste, and this was the 90s. Could I even get a woman to set foot in the car??? Could I F**K
Do you honestly think the cat was the only problem wink
You beat me to it stuart. There is actually no easy way to say this william, so I'll be frank. Lose the trainers, shorts, ankle socks and baggy top and you will have much greater success with the fairer sex. The Rover is lovely.

J
Like I said, that was 1995. I was 17. It was meant to be a fun response. fk you for making it so personal.
OP, just a bit a light-hearted banter. I read no malice into the remarks.

Elderly

3,493 posts

238 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
I'd say of the cars I've driven the biggest change modern cars have is v older cars brilliant brakes it's night and day.

.
In my experience the biggest change is between night and day - their lights biggrin.

Actually, the stopping power of my classic is great but as there in no servo
they appear awful to somebody who is only used to a modern (over-servoed) car.


Ahonen

5,016 posts

279 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
S47 said:
Nissan GTR - Stunning in straight line, too heavy to drive fast on 'B' roads, not for me.
Odd, because quite a few racing driver friends of mine (and I mean proper professionals who get paid to drive) reckon the handling of the GTR is completely amazing, almost as if it defies physics. It was a complete revalation when it was launched.

S47 said:
Audi RS4 - Dead handling, heavy horrible engine - No dynamics at all, a boring repmobile.
This depends on the generation of RS4, largely. The B7 version with the V8 is a very good drivers car and very highly rated by many, me included, but I agree the turbo V6 B5 was a bit woolly.

Ahonen

5,016 posts

279 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
jith said:
Minis. At 6ft 2in I find them impossible to sit in. Noisy, rust buckets and a death trap in a crash. Awful to work on.

Sorry, but my take on these things comes from my workshop experience, in other words reality.
I don't think people buy classics based on their potential crash performance. Minis were brilliant and the induction and gearbox noise is part of the charm. They remain probably the best handling cars I've ever driven.

We never found them to be especially tricky to work on, either. Of course lots of it is a bit tight, but then it's pretty tightly packaged overall...

themarsh

14 posts

104 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
I have ultimately been disappointed when revisiting the cars of my youth. Most of them were bought for peanuts and used until a better SOTW came along. On a few occasions I have been tempted to buy a MG, Triumph. Ford etc for 100 times more than I paid for the first one only to find the magic has gone. I still love my classics, but never buy a model that I had once owned before.

Flip Martian

19,666 posts

190 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
As a non classic owner, I've found this thread fascinating. I wouldn't understand anyone owning a classic and then having a chip on their shoulders about modern cars - pointless, surely you're into classics because you appreciate them for what they are. I don't have the disposable income or the technical nous to own any but surely just appreciate them for what they are. But its interesting to read views on those that disappoint, even as classics.

I've only really driven a couple of dream cars on a track day and they were modern(ish) - Lambo Gallardo and Aston DB7 (which really was my car lust car for a while and the one I looked forward to).

The Aston felt like a big, heavy and fast saloon - more a cruiser really, which I suppose it was, but very front end heavy. It reminded me of a more refined version of my '99 Camaro I'd driven there in. I was expecting a lot more from it given the price difference (putting aside it was a fairly thrashed track car, I suppose).

The Gallardo was from another planet. Hardly a car to do your grocery shopping in but my God, it was memorable for all the right reasons. Handled superbly and felt like a roller skate with a rocket on the back. I may well have thought differently had I been driving it off the track and around the nearest built up area and back...