Commer Express Delivery van: why so rare?

Commer Express Delivery van: why so rare?

Author
Discussion

bristolracer

5,543 posts

150 months

Wednesday 29th March 2017
quotequote all
BT (post office telephones) used to run a big fleet of these.
They were still in use when BT was sold off, bright yellow with the round Telecom logo on them.

hidetheelephants

24,484 posts

194 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
You're thinking of the PA space van like the red one shown; the OP is on about car derived Rootes vans.

david.h

410 posts

249 months

Sunday 2nd April 2017
quotequote all
In the late 60's while in the Army, the Unit Padre was issued with a Husky... It was borrowed on may occasions to use in Motoring News Rallies (Map reading training!)biggrin

MXRod

2,750 posts

148 months

roscobbc

3,376 posts

243 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Very early Hillman Husky/Commer Cob with side valve engine was an ultra lightweight short wheelbase vehicle popular in 'States a bit like sit-up and beg Ford Popular for sticking-in a V8 and being competitive in drag racing.
Later 50's/early '60's OHV equivalents were longer wheelbase and a fair bit heavier - they still rotted-out the same though!

ranchero

3 posts

79 months

Tuesday 10th October 2017
quotequote all
Hello,my name is Tom,i am new to this forum. I read about the Commer Express here,and can tell you that i have 2 of them here. One is 1958 model,and the other is a 1962 model. The Commer Express is very rare here too,the Cob is more famous.

Cliftonite

8,412 posts

139 months

Tuesday 10th October 2017
quotequote all
ranchero said:
Hello,my name is Tom,i am new to this forum. I read about the Commer Express here,and can tell you that i have 2 of them here. One is 1958 model,and the other is a 1962 model. The Commer Express is very rare here too,the Cob is more famous.
Pictures, please!

smile


Horsetan

410 posts

208 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
Jukebag said:
Anyone know why Commer Express Delivery Vans from the 1950s (not the camper vans) seem to have become very rare among the classic vans and cars that are still in relatively good numbers today?. They were similar to a Ford Thames van and somewhat similar to a Morris Minor, but where those two are still knocking about (particularly the Minor), the Commer Express vans have pretty much vanished off the face of the earth.

I don't know how popular or common they were back in the 50s and 60s, but my dad owned two during the 60s and knew one or two other people who owned one.

It's ashame very few of them have survived and haven't been preserved by enthusiasts.

Found this one for sale:

http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C829591
Reminds me of Tom's van in the Father Ted series, or was that a Ford Thames?





liner33

10,696 posts

203 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
Reminds me of the Wallace and Grommit van smile

hidetheelephants

24,484 posts

194 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
Horsetan said:
Reminds me of Tom's van in the Father Ted series, or was that a Ford Thames?

Austin A55 van; they sold them up to about 1970.

Edit to add; it was 1973.

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

109 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
RDMcG said:
Yes..column gear change in any one I have seen. Strangely, in those days a conventional floor mounted change was often regarded as old fashioned compared to the wonderful column change which left more space in the car. It was of course a fairly vague experience...I drove a few of them in my youngest days..at around 12 or so.My uncle had a Husky in Ireland...I can even recall the number plate ZY 877.
My first ca was a 1954 Hillman Minx saloon, very similar to the Husky estate illustration

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

109 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
I had never heard or seen that one before.

When I hear the words 'Commer van' this is the first image that enters my mind.

I seem to recall seeing loads of these around in the late 70's.

That vehicle illustrated has an L suffix. So what year was it first registered?

PistonBroker

2,422 posts

227 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
That vehicle illustrated has an L suffix. So what year was it first registered?
It was registered 1/3/73.

More interesting to me is that it has Stourport signwritten on it. The nearest town to where I grew up.

hidetheelephants

24,484 posts

194 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
TonyRPH said:
I had never heard or seen that one before.

When I hear the words 'Commer van' this is the first image that enters my mind.

I seem to recall seeing loads of these around in the late 70's.

That vehicle illustrated has an L suffix. So what year was it first registered?
1970, or is this a trick question and I'm due a parrot?

Moikey Fortune

1,650 posts

237 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
SantaBarbara said:
TonyRPH said:
I had never heard or seen that one before.

When I hear the words 'Commer van' this is the first image that enters my mind.

I seem to recall seeing loads of these around in the late 70's.

That vehicle illustrated has an L suffix. So what year was it first registered?
1970, or is this a trick question and I'm due a parrot?
Hmmm..manufacture year for this model is 1970 an first registration probably in March 1973

TonyRPH

12,977 posts

169 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
PistonBroker said:
SantaBarbara said:
That vehicle illustrated has an L suffix. So what year was it first registered?
It was registered 1/3/73.

More interesting to me is that it has Stourport signwritten on it. The nearest town to where I grew up.
hidetheelephants said:
1970, or is this a trick question and I'm due a parrot?
As per PistonBroker - March 1973


spaximus

4,233 posts

254 months

Thursday 12th October 2017
quotequote all
I worked for a car hire firm in the 70's and we had a load of comer vans, they were a good solid workhorse.

They handled like crap as the front suspension was narrow and the back end unladen was always trying to lift of the floor.

The hand brake worked on the front wheels so you could do a burnout easily.

They are quite trendy now as an alternative to the VW vans especially the camper conversions.

Perseverant

439 posts

112 months

Friday 13th October 2017
quotequote all
My parents had a Husky from new in 1961 to 1968. Apart from my dad using it for work and my mother eventually learning to drive in it, we went lots of holidays to the Lake District in it. It was a pretty Spartan vehicle and not that comfortable in the back for my sister and self. It had a conventional floor change and minimal instrumentation augmented by a Smith's oil pressure gauge fitted by dad. It was TWG 915. It was reliable as I recollect, being stopped with a dud condenser and the odd failure of the dog for the starting handle - dad used the handle in cold weather ant the dog stripped its thread thankfully leaving the crank thread undamaged!

grumpy52

5,598 posts

167 months

Friday 13th October 2017
quotequote all
spaximus said:
I worked for a car hire firm in the 70's and we had a load of comer vans, they were a good solid workhorse.

They handled like crap as the front suspension was narrow and the back end unladen was always trying to lift of the floor.

The hand brake worked on the front wheels so you could do a burnout easily.

They are quite trendy now as an alternative to the VW vans especially the camper conversions.
As others have mentioned when hitting the brakes for the first couple of times after they had been parked for a few days they could lift the rear wheels off the deck .
Caused by the handbrake leaving substance on the drums and in extreme cases making the drums oval.
The other danger for the unwary was getting reverse when going for fourth , if you were brutal it would split the gearbox.

ranchero

3 posts

79 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all