Jaguar C Types?

Author
Discussion

naturals

351 posts

183 months

Friday 23rd July 2010
quotequote all
plasticman said:
It is not a kit . I made the body and most of the other bits ( bar grill , headlamp lenses and hinges ) came from ebay.
That is amazing! I think I speak for everyone when I say we need some more pictures!!

gussie

1 posts

165 months

Saturday 24th July 2010
quotequote all
[quote=Doofus]So what is there to choose between the various C type replicas/recreations (Proteus, Lynx, Racing Green, Suffolk, CJR, TWR etc)? Most of them claim to be dimensionally perfect; suspension and engine options vary, but which a) the most historically accurate, and b) the one to have (for someone to whom FIA acceptance isn't a consideration)?



Hi Doofus and all, try Legends Classics Ltd in Hereford, they build great all aluminium cars, with 4.2 XK 5 speed box all but a few inches wider a great alternative to the failed Proteus Cars Ltd, probably the best C Type I have seen for sometime, I went along after finding their website Legendsclassics.com they were very helpful informative guys with great passion, they build hand rolled cars the old way! and the paint job is second to none well worth a visit, they dont seem to advertise in the glossies as they tick over nicely by word of mouth. not sure if they sell kit form though, I never asked!! cheers Gussie will dig out some photos I have and post them as soon as I have a minute.

goodwoodweirdo

307 posts

182 months

Monday 26th July 2010
quotequote all
Please tell us more how you went about building this beauty, is it a true copy as far as engine / chassis goes, or have you used modified running gear, then I would ask, did you build a buck for the body ? just happen to have one in the garage….


Great job, I love it…

Well done…

plasticman

899 posts

251 months

Monday 26th July 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for the great comments ! Basically I was asked to produce a set of fibreglass bucks so ally bodies could be copied from it . I was given a new ally body (to all original dimensions and shape )to make the moulds from and was given permission to make a body for myself . I added a passenger door and mildly modified the body to go onto a donor chassis I had bought from ebay . I extended the cockpit for more legroom and made other mods to make the car more useable ( like hinged backend for luggage space ) It has currently got a volvo turbo engine with overdrive box but uses the jag solid axle . Many engines will fit but I will probably change it for an XK in the future.

goodwoodweirdo

307 posts

182 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
[quote=plasticman]Thanks for the great comments ! Basically I was asked to produce a set of fibreglass bucks so ally bodies could be copied from it . I was given a new ally body (to all original dimensions and shape )to make the moulds from and was given permission to make a body for myself . I added a passenger door and mildly modified the body to go onto a donor chassis I had bought from ebay . I extended the cockpit for more legroom and made other mods to make the car more useable ( like hinged backend for luggage space ) It has currently got a volvo turbo engine with overdrive box but uses the jag solid axle . Many engines will fit but I will probably change it for an XK in the future/quote]

Hi plasticman, Clearly you’re very talented. I’m rather passionate about body fabrication even if totally useless at it… and can appreciate the work that’s gone into a “home built” body.

More pixs / details are very welcome.

regards

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
Holy thread resurrection....etc....

Just thought I'd get that out the way.

So my mind has been drifting lately between buying a decent Series 2 E type or buying or building a C type replica.

As was said earlier in the thread back in 2010, and answered I know, there seem to be loads of C type reps about, but which are decent quality and which are frankly a bit rough?

I love the idea of building one, I enjoy the build as much as the drive to be honest, and I was just wondering if the situation has changed in the last 3 years?

I've had not great experiences with a Porsche 550 Spyder replica by Beck, somehow I always felt a fake, and I got rid after just 6 weeks, so maybe a real E type or even XK OTS would be a better bet for me?

All thoughts / opinions appreciated.

arn22110

201 posts

194 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
Looking at the posting from Lax Power on page 2, how did he get the XJ 6 engine to look like the XK Engine (chromed cam covers?

lowdrag

12,893 posts

213 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
arn22110 said:
Looking at the posting from Lax Power on page 2, how did he get the XJ 6 engine to look like the XK Engine (chromed cam covers?
Er - change the cam covers for earlier ones?

arn22110

201 posts

194 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
As simple as that?!

v8250

2,724 posts

211 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
arn22110 said:
As simple as that?!
Yes, the cam covers and a few other mods - to an untrained eye the engines will look the same.

If anyone's after a pair of XJ6 cam covers from a series III I have a pair looking to go to a good home.

lowdrag

12,893 posts

213 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
But PLEASE, PLEASE, do not stick those ugly red C-type badges on your cam covers. It is the clearest giveaway that it is a replica and not a real C-type. Those badges were used to denote a hotter engine on production cars, not race cars.

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
Lowdrag......since you are the godfather of classic jags on PH, any thoughts on my post re C type rep vs E type / XK??

lowdrag

12,893 posts

213 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
Pm me and I'll reply by email. There are good and bad out there and I would rather chat privately.

greenrat

93 posts

144 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
arn22110 said:
Looking at the posting from Lax Power on page 2, how did he get the XJ 6 engine to look like the XK Engine (chromed cam covers?
I'm in the process now. I'm stripping a Series 3 and hopefully ending up with a reasonable facsimile of an original D type engine. I'll be swapping cam covers, chucking on some Webers and adding an oil catcher. It's all available new or second hand. I briefly considered adding dry sump but it is only going to be a lookalike for fast road use, so I can't justify the added expense. I went with the Series 3 because of it's bigger inlet valves to suit the Webers (and because it was an available runner!) but you do need to strip out all the EFI kit - I'll let you know at the end if this was a mistake or not. Don't hold your breath though, I've got miles to go yet.

a8hex

5,830 posts

223 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
But PLEASE, PLEASE, do not stick those ugly red C-type badges on your cam covers. It is the clearest giveaway that it is a replica and not a real C-type. Those badges were used to denote a hotter engine on production cars, not race cars.
The red head paint and C-Type engine badges are only correct on XK140s. The hotter XK120 didn't have them, the XK150 had the "B" type head as standard, same power but at lower revs and a better torque spread. The hotter XK150s are the "S" and they have pumpkin coloured head paint.

So with the head colours Tony, did the E-Type start off with the pumpkin colour and if so I'm intrigued as to when it switched to gold.

lowdrag

12,893 posts

213 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
Pumpkin is the answer, if I remember what pumpkin looks like correctly. Dark gold would be another way of putting it. It was the same head and porting as the 150S so it just followed on. Oh, and don't forget that any car that wore the "M" connotation had the C-type badges, including for example the 120M, 140M and Mk VIIM. They had about 20bhp over the standard engine.

a8hex

5,830 posts

223 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
Pumpkin is the answer, if I remember what pumpkin looks like correctly. Dark gold would be another way of putting it. It was the same head and porting as the 150S so it just followed on. Oh, and don't forget that any car that wore the "M" connotation had the C-type badges, including for example the 120M, 140M and Mk VIIM. They had about 20bhp over the standard engine.
I'll happily bow to you knowledge of MkVIIs as I know next to nothing about them.

"M" was a US designation, "M" being short of "Modified", these were cars to Special Equipment specification, normally referred to as "SE" models. The SE variant of the 120 was introduce at the same time as the 120FHC. The carry an S prefix to their chassis numbers and for the 120 an S suffix to their engine numbers. The earliest XK140SEs fitted with C type heads continued to have plain metal heads, but only the first few, I don't know of a date when they switched to painting them red. The factory build records indicate that from the 5th October 1954 the
JAGUAR
TYPE C
badge was fitted, with the cam covers being drilled to accept the badge. Again with the earliest of these cars having the badges unpainted before they too switched to having the background painted matching red.
For the XK150 there are no records of any non SE or S spec production cars. There is a memo on the files from the factory to the marketing department asking for details of specification of a "standard" XK150, but no recorded reply.
The XK150S, both 3.4 and 3.8 have the heads painted "Old Gold" according to Jaguar, but the colour is a pumpkin orange and the best modern match is believed to be Ford Autumn Orange 1497A81 (OK, I'm reading that bit from a book)

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
bertie said:
Lowdrag......since you are the godfather of classic jags on PH, any thoughts on my post re C type rep vs E type / XK??
Little bump, it's a year on, and I'm back here thinking the same, any thoughts?

Lowdrag, did I ever PM you , sorry can't remember!

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
bertie said:
Lowdrag......since you are the godfather of classic jags on PH, any thoughts on my post re C type rep vs E type / XK??
Little bump, it's a year on, and I'm back here thinking the same, any thoughts?

Lowdrag, did I ever PM you , sorry can't remember!

lowdrag

12,893 posts

213 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Sorry, Al Zheimer, you didn't or I would have replied!