Would It Take Off?

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

gorvid

22,233 posts

226 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
fozzi said:
gorvid said:
The thrust never reaches the conveyor belt... it pushes the plane forward - then the wheels spin faster to compensate.

Theory = take off
not if the wheels spin at the same speed as the conveyor


It's got you fozzi

You are being drawn into the conundrum.

The plane speed is relative to the environment - powered by the jet
The conveyor and the wheels then enter an eternal struggle of speed matching - but meanwhile the plane moves forward in its environment and takes off.

fozzi

3,773 posts

241 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
galileo said:
The question is ambigious at best and not a well laid-out scientific inquiry. This arguement is only to due to the ambuity of the question which should be layed out differently. no offence.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
That conveyor's going to get bloody hot.....

thegreenhell

15,437 posts

220 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
fozzi said:
"tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same"... e.g. the plane is not moving relative to the surroundings, hence no airflow, no lift, no take off!


If the plane were not moving relative to the surroundings, ie zero ground speed, then by definition of the original question the conveyor would be matching this zero speed and itself not moving !?!

As soon as the engines start to give any thrust the plane would move forwards relative to the surroundings, the convyor would move backwards at the same ground speed as the plane moves forwards, thus making the plane's wheels spin at double their normal speed, BUT HAVING NO EFFECT ON THE PLANE'S FORWARD MOTION OTHER THAN A TINY BIT MORE ROLLING DRAG.

The plane's forward thrust comes from the engines moving air and is totally independent of the ground. You could make the conveyor move as quickly as you wanted in the opposite direction to the plane's motion and the plane would still move forwards through the air, thus gaining the lift it requires to take off.

>> Edited by thegreenhell on Saturday 4th March 12:52

unlogic

162 posts

219 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
That conveyor's going to get bloody hot.....




Like this thread....

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
The conveyor and the aircrafts' wheels cancell each other out.

Lift can only be created by air passing over the wings creating low pressure.

The air must pass over the wings at the normal rate and this can only happen if the aircraft is actually moving through the air.

It will not take off.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
Anybody with a model aircraft...?

Meet me at Tesco's......

Last till on the right.....

gorvid

22,233 posts

226 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
Then what prevents the thrust from moving the plane?

Imagine a motorbike and sidecar on a long road.

The bike is on normal road...the sidecar is on a coveyor belt built in to its half of the road.

The conveyor is running *and will match the speed of the bike*.

The bike moves off - the sidecar follows the sidecar wheels are moving really fast though

The jet thrust is not related to the plane wheels
The bike movement is not related to the sidecar wheels

BliarOut

72,857 posts

240 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
stovey said:
The conveyor and the aircrafts' wheels cancell each other out.

Lift can only be created by air passing over the wings creating low pressure.

The air must pass over the wings at the normal rate and this can only happen if the aircraft is actually moving through the air.

It will not take off.
Wheels spin freely, ergo they can't transmit an opposing force into the airframe to hold the engine back. She takes off every single time we discuss this. Airframe must be getting a bit tired by now

unlogic

162 posts

219 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
Airframe must be getting a bit tired by now




Bloody knackered, i would suspect

gorvid

22,233 posts

226 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all

fozzi

3,773 posts

241 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
the wheels are connected to the under-carriage
the under-carriage is connected to the fuselage
the fuselage is connected to the wings
the wings are connected to the engines
and that's what it all about...

fire engines up, get thrust, plane moves forward... on it's wheels!!!!!!!

no drive shafts, but thrust IS directed through wheels until the plane is in flight... otherwise all the jumbos in the testing bay at heathrow, with their brakes on, would vtol up into the sky.

>> Edited by fozzi on Saturday 4th March 13:02

thegreenhell

15,437 posts

220 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
fozzi said:
the wheels are attached the under-carriage
the under-carriage is connected to the fuselage
the fuselage is connected to the wings
the wings are connected to the engines
and that's what it all about...

fire engines up, get thrust, plane moves forward... on it's wheels!!!!!!!

no drive shafts, but thrust IS directed through wheels until the plane is in flight... otherwise all the jumbos in the testing bay at heathrow, with their brakes on, would vtol up into the sky.


No! All that the wheels on the aircraft are for is to stop the fuselage from scraping along the tarmac as the jet engines push it along!

gorvid

22,233 posts

226 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
1) Wheels = a way of moving with no friction (what about seaplanes??)
2) READ the motorcycle analogy above (read it)

fozzi

3,773 posts

241 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
No! All that the wheels on the aircraft are for is to stop the fuselage from scraping along the tarmac as the jet engines push it along!
Yes, but if you put the brakes on, the plane does not move!

galileo

3,145 posts

219 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
stovey said:
The conveyor and the aircrafts' wheels cancell each other out.

Lift can only be created by air passing over the wings creating low pressure.

The air must pass over the wings at the normal rate and this can only happen if the aircraft is actually moving through the air.

It will not take off.


Correct, IF you've made the mistake of assuming the wheels are doing the forward thrust, which they don't on all the aircraft I know. If they did then your right. But the jets which do the pushing push against the air, and have no interaction with the conveyor belt. There are two systems at work...wheels against belt and jets against air. The confusion is that the question does not mention how the aircraft is being moved forward. I hate ambiguity, I'm a scientist. PLEASE re-write the question properly.

gorvid

22,233 posts

226 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
what do you think would happen if the plane was at max thrust with its brakes on?

galileo

3,145 posts

219 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
fozzi said:
the wheels are connected to the under-carriage
the under-carriage is connected to the fuselage
the fuselage is connected to the wings
the wings are connected to the engines
and that's what it all about...

fire engines up, get thrust, plane moves forward... on it's wheels!!!!!!!

no drive shafts, but thrust IS directed through wheels until the plane is in flight... otherwise all the jumbos in the testing bay at heathrow, with their brakes on, would vtol up into the sky.

>> Edited by fozzi on Saturday 4th March 13:02


You need to think that through mate. thrust isn't throught the wheels, its through the jets. the reason they dont vtol is that the thrust is being counteracted by the friction of the braked tyres against the tarmac. if the jets were put on full throttle(and not just idling in the test bay)then the thrust might overcome the friction and the tyres would be dragged along the ground leaving skid marks. Unless the friction of the tyres on ground is greater than the friction of the brakes in which case the wheels would turn.

galileo

3,145 posts

219 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
I think a small lesson in aircraft mechanics is required. they dont work the same as cars. A good dose of Newtons three laws of motion would do some of you some good aswell.

fozzi

3,773 posts

241 months

Saturday 4th March 2006
quotequote all
believe me, they do not idle in the test bay and the brakes are good enough to resist which is probably lucky for the residents of hounslow
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED