BBC1 Tonight at 9 - To Kill a Burglar: The Tony Martin Story

BBC1 Tonight at 9 - To Kill a Burglar: The Tony Martin Story

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
Should make interesting viewing especially seeing as it contains testimony from both Tony Martin and the little shit head, sorry, wounded burglar, Brendon Fearon!

ps2gamer890

708 posts

221 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
It's a miscarriage of justice that Martin got the rap if you ask me. He was just trying to defend himself and his home. Afterall, dead scum don't commit crimes.

t1grm

4,655 posts

285 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


He did get murder and then it was reduced to manslaughter on appeal on grounds of diminished responsibility.

I thought I heard a while back that he'd been kidnapped by pikeys who had a price on his head?

simpo two

85,615 posts

266 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]

That's right, as they have no money they can't be FINED so the Govt has no control over them, short of prison.

The rest of us our controlled by FINES; have you noticed that?

bga

8,134 posts

252 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


It made me laugh when I read that Fearon had been beaten up by a bunch of travellers in a pub for giving them a bad name. Wish I could find a link to it

chilli

17,318 posts

237 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


timmy30

9,325 posts

228 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


What would a rambler be doing in the middle of the night, in his house????

Ecks Ridgehead

4,285 posts

229 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
timmy30 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]


What would a rambler be doing in the middle of the night, in his house????


Running away, I'd have thought.

C C

7,890 posts

240 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


Not that I totally disapprove of shooting ramblers. It’s unlikely a rambler would be climbing in his ground-floor window late at night.

Seriously though if Barras had perhaps been given sterner sentences earlier in his short life he may have had second thoughts about attempting to burgle Bleak House in the first place and therefor would still be alive today.
I really believe that soft treatment of juvenile offenders is doing them or the community at large absolutely no favours at all.

Jaglover

42,490 posts

236 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


Very well said Tonker; I agree entirely.

Furyblade_Lee

4,108 posts

225 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
If anyone breaks into my house with my wife and baby asleep, they are dead, period. Had i had been in Tony Martins shoes I wouldn't have missed the other bastard either. You play with fire, you get burned. It's like those muppets who throw bricks at British Para's with big guns. If I threw a brick at a Para, which is a weapon intent to injure, i'd expect to get shot. Maybe i am stupid?

mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
There is also the matter of the unlawful ownership of firearms to consider.
In fact if he'd carried out his actions today he well may have recieved harsher sentencing for the firearms crime than the killing. Weird Huh?

MoJo.

zeb

3,204 posts

219 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
Good post tonker...i agree

Furyblade_Lee

4,108 posts

225 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
Not condoning weapons to "neutralise" intruders(or people sniffing round your property with intent to steal it), BUT , WHAT I FOUND WORKS is a C02 fire extinguisher. You know the type, big black horn. As forementioned undesirable approches in the dark, squeeze the trigger and give them that delightful 130db blast to the face. As they are thinking "what the bloody hell was that" and are in an extreme state of shock and profoundley deaf, you are then free to escort them from the premesis (or hit them in the face with the bottom of it). It also works with local drug dealers dogs (ahem). When the judge at your manslaughter trial asks why you had a CO2 fire extinguisher in your bedroom, simply reply "To put fires out, Your Honour"

greg_D

6,542 posts

247 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
Furyblade_Lee said:
When the judge at your manslaughter trial asks why you had a CO2 fire extinguisher in your bedroom, simply reply "To put fires out, Your Honour"


screw justifying your position to the court, if someone was in my house and was not running away when confronted, you have to assume that they are going to attempt to injure you or your family, in that circumstance they would get whatever was to hand (i use a dumbell bar, just the right length and would do a lot more damage than a baseball bat)

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
I think these parasites should be forced into drug trials. Much better sentence than 10 years/serve 3 in a nicely warmed cell!!

I'd love to see them with a head the size of a spacehopper!!

alfaman

6,416 posts

235 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
running the prison service in the UK costs way too much .

we should outsource prisons to somewhere like Malawi or Zambia - and keep the prisoners busy building roads , schools and water supply.

(well we did it once before ........ )

racefan_uk

2,935 posts

257 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
If someone broke into my property and I'd given them both barrells I'd make sure there wasn't a body to find to incriminate me in the first place.

The ers would never do it again. At least that way it'd be sure to help the crime figures in some way.

alfaman

6,416 posts

235 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


a jail like "Escape from New York" ? - just ring-fence some crappy town and let them get on with it . very low supervision costs.

Furyblade_Lee

4,108 posts

225 months

Thursday 16th March 2006
quotequote all
Last year a friend of mine (have to be careful here legally) was cleared of manslaughter at the Old Bailey (was origionally murder) after he "defended" his family from someone who had been systematically terrorising them for months. Despite hard taped evidence of threats of murder, rape of his mum, and killing the baby (i am NOT joking) THE POLICE DID NOT EVEN INTERVIEW THE MAN, and would not until he actually DID something. The guy one night crashed a stolen car INTO his house, attacked 3 vehicles on the drive with various weapons and was attempting to smash the front door down to gain access to them all when he recieved a crossbow bolt to the thigh from an upstairs window. The tt was wanted for drugs and armed robbery offences so couldnt go to hospital and subsequently bled to death when he pulled the bolt out himself. My friend was genuinly sorry for killing him but the consequences of letting the guy into his house do not bear comparison. I know I would have done the same.
If the police would have just taken the time to use surveillance and catch him in the weeks previous it would not have happened at all and he'd still be alive.
There were 15 of them in the same road a week before checking tax discs.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED