Lotus; where to start

Lotus; where to start

Author
Discussion

fridaypassion

8,563 posts

228 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
Yup. That's exactly what I have. Massively cheaper and OEM reliability such as it is.

Richie200

Original Poster:

2,011 posts

209 months

Wednesday 14th January 2015
quotequote all
Is it really as simple as portrayed here. Usually considering an engine swap from another car would normally mean Exhaust fabrication, wiring loom modification, new ECU, compatibility issues with ECU, engine mounts, gearbox bell housing matching...
If heavier it could also induce handling and braking issues.
Is the 160 Trophy lump much heavier and are there any links to the conversion?
Does a converted car lose value or are they more sort after; I haven't noticed any for sale?



fridaypassion

8,563 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
The 160 is basically the same engine so it fits straight in. Same gearbox and everything from the manifold onwards on the exhaust is the same. Dan Jude from sps automotive did mine. Roadboy on seloc. It's been faultless. Highly recommended.

Richie200

Original Poster:

2,011 posts

209 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
fridaypassion said:
The 160 is basically the same engine so it fits straight in. Same gearbox and everything from the manifold onwards on the exhaust is the same. Dan Jude from sps automotive did mine. Roadboy on seloc. It's been faultless. Highly recommended.
Many thanks for this info FP, good to hear it is a straight swap. Are these engines easy enough to come by and are they generally considered reliable? Good to hear that you are happy with yours and that you've had no dramas wink Is the ECU also a straight swap using existing loom?

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
The VVC has exactly the same issues as the 120bhp version (ie head gasket and not a great deal else), plus a small risk of the VVC unit itself failing but that's very rare. The VVC until can be quite noisy (a faintly dieselish rattle at idle and a fast clicking at higher revs) if that bothers you.

I think the EU2 VVC (143bhp as used in the S1 111S) is a straight swap with the 118bhp engine using the Rover ECU from the donor. However, the later 156hp EU3 VVC engine used a proprietary Lotus ECU which is I think is not a straight electrical swap into the S1. I don't know enough to know how much work it is to fit, though.


Edited by kambites on Thursday 15th January 08:43

fridaypassion

8,563 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
Very true the VVC engine is not the last word in smooth quiet running and it does indeed sound like an 80s bedford ice cram van on idle.

My setup has the ECU from the 160 and an adapted loom but retains the original ECU to run the speedo and temp display for the dash. Dan has done loads of these and buys 160 MG's regularly so engines are always available.

They are slightly less prone to HGF as they run a remote stat so the temp is a bit more stable. It will go eventually though of course!

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
I can't help but feel it might be easier just to buy an S2 111S in the first place though. biggrin

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
kambites said:
I can't help but feel it might be easier just to buy an S2 111S in the first place though. biggrin
It's the sweet spot I think...especially an early one without the elastictrickery windows.

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
andy_s said:
kambites said:
I can't help but feel it might be easier just to buy an S2 111S in the first place though. biggrin
It's the sweet spot I think...especially an early one without the elastictrickery windows.
Not sure what advantage not having the electric windows is really. They don't seem to weigh anything much and mine at least haven't gone wrong (yet). I didn't particularly want them, but I didn't particularly not want them either.

The one thing I wanted to avoid was AC because that IS heavy and prone to failure.

fridaypassion

8,563 posts

228 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Both pointless on the Elise IMO

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Electric windows make it easier to take the roof off from the drivers seat, albeit only marginally.

I really couldn't care less either way about the windows though, I certainly wouldn't turn a car down because they were electric. I would (and did) turn cars down for having AC.

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
kambites said:
andy_s said:
kambites said:
I can't help but feel it might be easier just to buy an S2 111S in the first place though. biggrin
It's the sweet spot I think...especially an early one without the elastictrickery windows.
Not sure what advantage not having the electric windows is really. They don't seem to weigh anything much and mine at least haven't gone wrong (yet). I didn't particularly want them, but I didn't particularly not want them either.

The one thing I wanted to avoid was AC because that IS heavy and prone to failure.
Was just kidding tongue out