US Elise engine chosen

US Elise engine chosen

Author
Discussion

slade

17 posts

276 months

Saturday 23rd March 2002
quotequote all
adeewuff, I agree - the Elise is about handling. We were just discussing the U.S. engine. I intend to race this car *and* drive it on the street. If I could live with a track only car I would have bought the s190.

I hope as well that they don't add any extraneous weight. I will opt for the A/C delete. Does anyone know exactly how much more the U.S. elise will weigh?

bikehorn

3 posts

280 months

Sunday 24th March 2002
quotequote all
GREAT! way better than that K-series. i can't wait to bolt on a supercharger!

englishman in LA

291 posts

274 months

Friday 26th April 2002
quotequote all
Time to revive this thread... I was trolling through the Lotus news articles, and found that the elise air con unit weighs 15kg (33lbs for americans)... theres no way I'm deleting that then, I can't imagine anyone beinag able to detect that difference in the car...

www.lotuscars.co.uk/template.cfm?name=Lotus%5FElise%5FHardtop%5Fand%5FAir%5FConditioning

also, for people who have deposits and are waiting a good collection of pictures of the colour options are on:

www.kirschmann.ch/lotus/index.html

gunmetal grey with black anodised wheels for me I think either that or the JSP scheme.

thom

2,745 posts

274 months

Friday 26th April 2002
quotequote all
I love the "Heritage"

slade

17 posts

276 months

Friday 26th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

theres no way I'm deleting that then, I can't imagine anyone beinag able to detect that difference in the car...


Thanks for the info. Since you live in LA you might actually use the A/C. Here in Seattle it's just dead weight 99% of the time.

I like the yellow - classic race color and everyone will see you! For safety reasons, of course.

englishman in LA

291 posts

274 months

Saturday 27th April 2002
quotequote all
Oi! Lotus!

I tried to refrain from calling the dealer where my deposit is every 5 mins, but today I caved, and they don't know anything about the engine! get your PR in order and keep these people posted... you have our money now.

Steve

superg

6 posts

265 months

Saturday 27th April 2002
quotequote all
Well its nice the speculation is over but i have some questions regarding the engine someone might be able to answer. Does the toyota engine weigh significantly more than the k-series, and what are the naturally asperated tuning possiblities of this as compared to the K-series(there is an exellent guide for the k-series linked on this site).
thanks,
gsb

paulnederland

42 posts

281 months

Monday 6th May 2002
quotequote all
Since the engine choice is so important to not only US customers but also to the RoW, I like to start the speculation again about the engine.
I fear that the Toyota engine might be wishful thinking..... What if it is NOT the Toy engine?
There are also some rumors about the V6 from the M250 for the Elise. Were has that engine gone?
Any comments?

adeewuff

567 posts

271 months

Monday 6th May 2002
quotequote all
I really doubt Lotus would put a V6 in the Elise. It would be very out of character for the car and it would weigh far more. If it were not the Toyota engine going in then I could imagine a Ford or GM unit taking it's place.

smeagol

1,947 posts

285 months

Monday 6th May 2002
quotequote all
I don't think it would be out of character as the GT1 Elise had a V8 in it and boy is that a lovely car (want one). I think a v6 (or even the esprit v8) would be excellent in this car, as a "big brother elise" possibly the new esprit now that the m250 is dead.

I_Romo

4 posts

266 months

Monday 6th May 2002
quotequote all
Nope guys,

an italian importer I know,made a unique realization,mating an Elise mk1 with an Alfa 3000 V6.

Performance was stunning but handling a little compromised....

C'mon!,Colin Chapman said "to go faster add lightness"!!!!!!!!

adeewuff

567 posts

271 months

Monday 6th May 2002
quotequote all
I agree that the GT1 was a beast, I'm sure Lotus would have sold quite a few if they had made a road/track going version of it.

It's just that if Lotus were to put a V6 in an Elise it would start to compete, price wise, with Boxsters and Audi TTs. Now IMHO Lotus can't hope to start targeting that range of the market with the Elise. Build quality is still a big issue and the little Elise just isn't luxurious or comfortable enough to convince Audi, BMW or Porsche buyers.

Lotus desperately need a M250 type vehicle to take on these cars. It could stay true to the Lotus principles but have more room, more power and even better handling than the Elise. If this car was created then this would be the cash cow that Lotus need to finance their other projects.

Just tarting up what is effectively a stripped out race car isn't enough to sell it as a luxury sports car. I know the name carries alot of weight but Lotus don't have the build quality to match it yet. I really hope they sort themselves out before risking the Elise name in the states. If they get it wrong then it will prove to be very embarrasing and costly.

lotusbmw

38 posts

285 months

Monday 6th May 2002
quotequote all
well Road and Track rated the European S2 with 122 bhp second to the Ferrari 360 in their test of the best handling cars. It won the contest by performance data alone(competition was 360, z06 vette, bmw m3, porche boxster s and 911 turbo just to name a few) but was second for lack of amenities. ah add a/c to mine with more bhp! oh and the elise has the new record for speed in the slalom test with 73 mph!

great article...good suggested read.

smeagol

1,947 posts

285 months

Tuesday 7th May 2002
quotequote all
quote:

C'mon!,Colin Chapman said "to go faster add lightness"!!!!!!!!


Yes but he was limited by engine size. Lotus road cars are not and I've driven the standard S1 Elise and it was/is low on power, they have made the same mistake with the S2. The exige I drove was much better but still I would imagine after about a year I would want more. The G pushing you back just isn't enough IMHO.

In all fairness whilst I have the greatest repect for one of the best engineers/innovators the world has ever seen, Colin was also renoun for building fragile cars. In fact he used to believe he had over-engineered it, if the car finished with no problems.

One problem Lotus is facing is that the Noble, Tvr, Ultima etc. all have far more power and this is the market they are competing with (enthusiast more than social label IMHO). I don't ever see Lotus as competetion to Audi, BMW or Porsche as Adeewuff has said (the build quality isn't there), but there are lots of people like myself that don't want luxury sports cars they want racing pedigree. Have you seen inside a Ferarri F40? luxury it ain't!

>> Edited by smeagol on Tuesday 7th May 01:03

Englishman in LA

291 posts

274 months

Tuesday 7th May 2002
quotequote all
IMHO over here the elise will be in direct competition with the S2000, the TT and maybe even the Boxsters. The Lotus name carries alot of weight. People who buy TTs and the like are already making a significant sacrifice for performance over here. If you want luxury you drive an SUV with satellite nav, and 4 tv/dvd sets in the back for the kids. I believe that if the've gone that far a significant number will take one more step and get a lotus.

Steve

adeewuff

567 posts

271 months

Tuesday 7th May 2002
quotequote all
quote:

IMHO over here the elise will be in direct competition with the S2000, the TT and maybe even the Boxsters. The Lotus name carries alot of weight. People who buy TTs and the like are already making a significant sacrifice for performance over here.



This what I'm really scared about, the Lotus cannot compete with the cars. No way! I've had the chance to at least sit in all the cars you mentioned above and those cars are fantastically built and designed. The Lotus Elise can compete on handling and looks but it ends there.

There are several things that you should be aware of when buying the Elise.

1) You WILL get wet! The soft top can be adjusted so as to deflect most of the water but you will get dripped on.

2) Every bump, every indentation in the road you will either feel or hear. Great for the track but on an everyday interstate? The stiff, light chassis does a fine job of conducting the noise through it's hollow extruded sections.

How do I know this? I had a Lotus Elise S1 for a year and have driven quite a few S2's recently. So the question is would an Audi, Porsche or S2000 driver put up with this for a better handling, lower powered car while still paying the same money? IMHO, and this is only my very small 2 cents worth, No.

Please don't see me as being anti-Lotus because of these views, I ran an Elise and it was one of the best cars I've ever driven and well worth the compromise. It's just that the Elise is the wrong car to be pushed into that market and I can't see it convincing enough people for it to be a success.

Englishman in LA

291 posts

274 months

Tuesday 7th May 2002
quotequote all
I'm not sure that Lotus will have much choice in its competition... and I do understand and agree with almost everything you've said... particularly concerning to me are the freeways here. They are in dreadful condition, and they are a hard enough ride in the cougar.

A quick survey of american friends has put the estmated price of the Elise based on its name at 100 to 200k (USD). Being able to by that perception for 40k will make the elise very popular in the poser crowd unfortunately.

Steve

smeagol

1,947 posts

285 months

Tuesday 7th May 2002
quotequote all
quote:

It's just that the Elise is the wrong car to be pushed into that market and I can't see it convincing enough people for it to be a success.


I agree adeewuff, the Elise is completely wrong to compete against the makes you mention. The Elise is a "no frills sports car". Its whole cencept/ambiance (whatever) is not to compete with luxury cars. Lotus could be making a huge mistake.

Englishman in LA

291 posts

274 months

Tuesday 7th May 2002
quotequote all
I don't necessarily see it as a mistake... depends on your point of view. If they are competing against the TT and the like, then 1% of that market for Lotus is a huge amount, and therefore financially a success.

I also feel that there will be a significant number of people who can afford one as a second car, which will mean that the car will spend more time doing what it was designed to do on weekend runs in the mountains, and on the track. I see that as a sucess for Lotus too, as more people will come to recognise the rapidly dissapearing car in front as a Lotus.

The only I see danger for Lotus on this is if the build quality is such that expensive repairs/alterations are required. From what I've read on here there are a number of such faults and Brits also (quite rightly) will not just accept all of these as part of owning a performance car, and will demand repairs.

Am I missing something?

adeewuff

567 posts

271 months

Tuesday 7th May 2002
quotequote all
I don't think you're missing anything and I think the scale of the states is something that us small island Brits forget sometimes (me included!).

Lotus MUST get the cars in perfect working order at the factory rather than relying on the dealerships in the States sorting the cars out for them. I'm sure new owners to the Lotus Marque don't want to be seen as testbeds for the new engine and any problems that WILL show up!

What really confuses me over the troubles with the S2 Elise is that it is essentially such a simple car. But worse of all is that the problems are so obvious that it seems bizarre that they aren't sorted out during assembly. It's always the niggly little things that irritate car owners, as you know, and there has to be concerted effort to improve quality at the risk of losing there small, fragile reputation.

But if they get it right, and I really, really hope they do, then they can start putting money into developing the M250 replacement to get the big bucks rolling in!