4.5 SuperSport Power Run Graph -- Non Decatted

4.5 SuperSport Power Run Graph -- Non Decatted

Author
Discussion

glow worm

Original Poster:

5,867 posts

228 months

Wednesday 14th August 2013
quotequote all
I had my bespoke mapping today, followed by Power run with Jason and Dom at Power Performance.
Configuration Tuscan 'S' convertible,standard exhaust with cats, ACT airbox with trumpets,3:73 diff otherwise standard. Comparision with a "Good" Standard 4 litre non decatted Tuscan (there were alot much worse and not all Tuscans). Cats do degrade all performance considerably.





Edited by glow worm on Wednesday 14th August 20:37

RedSpike66

2,336 posts

213 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
At the risk of getting flamed, that torque graph looks very good, but the power graph doesn't... After bespoke mapping of my 4.0 de-catted Sag at Powers Performance I got virtually the same BHP graph as you (in fact 369bhp max) but the TORQUE curve of the lower graph ...

Seems a bit wierd.

Jhonno

5,779 posts

142 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
The CATS will be robbing the top end horribly..

glow worm

Original Poster:

5,867 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
We (Jason and I) reckonned the cats were causing a loss of between 40-50 BHP comparing various other power runs.
However looking at some 4 litre Decatted runs, not all gave good figures. So there are good and bad engines.
The standard exhaust on a Tuscan however does give better figures that a standard exhaust on a Sag .
Maybe one day I'll get the cats removed... but I don't want MOT issues with emmisions and I don't often hit 6000 revs smile .

Edited by glow worm on Thursday 15th August 12:37

Tammy Wynette

9 posts

157 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
glow worm said:
We (Jason and I) reckonned the cats were causing a loss of between 40-50 BHP comparing various other power runs.
However looking at some 4 litre Decatted runs, not all gave good figures. So there are good and bad engines.
The standard exhaust on a Tuscan however does give better figures that a standard exhaust on a Sag .
Maybe one day I'll get the cats removed... but I don't want MOT issues with emmisions.
You should use Racing Green Sports cats, they will give you 30 of these horses back without the MOT problem.

YRRunner

1,652 posts

217 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
Tammy Wynette said:
You should use Racing Green Sports cats, they will give you 30 of these horses back without the MOT problem.
Do they do these for a Sag?

blueg33

35,981 posts

225 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
RedSpike66 said:
At the risk of getting flamed, that torque graph looks very good, but the power graph doesn't... After bespoke mapping of my 4.0 de-catted Sag at Powers Performance I got virtually the same BHP graph as you (in fact 369bhp max) but the TORQUE curve of the lower graph ...

Seems a bit wierd.
My decatted Tuscan 4.0 non s with Power rebuild showed 366bhp, so very close to the top graph and to your Sag.

Cats are robbers of power

glow worm

Original Poster:

5,867 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
My decatted Tuscan 4.0 non s with Power rebuild showed 366bhp, so very close to the top graph and to your Sag.

Cats are robbers of power
Can you put the graph up on here ? a non S @ the wheels on Powers dyno? I saw one which didn't make 300 bhp.

I suppose if you add 40 bhp to the 4 litre catted graph , you're at the same as mine. But you won't match the torque smile .



Edited by glow worm on Thursday 15th August 17:55

Tvr Power

1,076 posts

207 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
YRRunner said:
Tammy Wynette said:
You should use Racing Green Sports cats, they will give you 30 of these horses back without the MOT problem.
Do they do these for a Sag?
Any aftermarket cats supplied other than ourselves will invalidate powers warranty...

Dom

s5tvr

1,239 posts

234 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
I can't remember the numbers but I had my 3.6 RR T350 de-catted and though it made a difference that justified doing it, the cats didn't rob me of any more than 10-15 bhp peak.

spitfire4v8

3,992 posts

182 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
^^ and in any case the cats aren't that restrictive .. I've no idea where numbers of 40-50bhp gains come from decatted, try 7 or 8 hp!

Tvr Power

1,076 posts

207 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
spitfire4v8 said:
^^ and in any case the cats aren't that restrictive .. I've no idea where numbers of 40-50bhp gains come from decatted, try 7 or 8 hp!
Spitfire lad when are you out racing your 3.6 speed six

Dom

blueg33

35,981 posts

225 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
glow worm said:
blueg33 said:
My decatted Tuscan 4.0 non s with Power rebuild showed 366bhp, so very close to the top graph and to your Sag.

Cats are robbers of power
Can you put the graph up on here ? a non S @ the wheels on Powers dyno? I saw one which didn't make 300 bhp.

I suppose if you add 40 bhp to the 4 litre catted graph , you're at the same as mine. But you won't match the torque smile .



Edited by glow worm on Thursday 15th August 17:55
I would if I could, but the graphs went to the new owner.

I guess the thing I am not certain of if whether there were upgrades on the rebuild as it was done about 6 months before I bought the car. But I do recall the print outs to the extent that I can see them in my head. Dom also said it was pretty good

WolfyJones

945 posts

133 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
spitfire4v8 said:
^^ and in any case the cats aren't that restrictive .. I've no idea where numbers of 40-50bhp gains come from decatted, try 7 or 8 hp!
That was also my understanding, and doesn't decatting also bring the torque down?
Maybe its got a blocked cat????

glow worm

Original Poster:

5,867 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
Decatting reduces torque ? Please explain.

I think comparing the two graphs is what you would expect when comparing two cars both with cats ... or are you saying both cars have cat problems ?

Having experienced the airflow and exhaust flows at 6500 revs I can't see my cats being blocked . Burning hydrocarbons with a 15:1 oxygen ratio creates a lot of exhaust gases.



Edited by glow worm on Thursday 15th August 22:46

spitfire4v8

3,992 posts

182 months

Thursday 15th August 2013
quotequote all
Tvr Power said:
spitfire4v8 said:
^^ and in any case the cats aren't that restrictive .. I've no idea where numbers of 40-50bhp gains come from decatted, try 7 or 8 hp!
Spitfire lad when are you out racing your 3.6 speed six

Dom
No idea Dom me old fella. only 2 races left now!

WolfyJones

945 posts

133 months

Friday 16th August 2013
quotequote all
glow worm said:
Decatting reduces torque ? Please explain.

I think comparing the two graphs is what you would expect when comparing two cars both with cats ... or are you saying both cars have cat problems ?

Having experienced the airflow and exhaust flows at 6500 revs I can't see my cats being blocked . Burning hydrocarbons with a 15:1 oxygen ratio creates a lot of exhaust gases.



Edited by glow worm on Thursday 15th August 22:46

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?f=10&...

Did you not do some RR runs at power with your old engine before the upgrade for comparison?

WolfyJones

945 posts

133 months

Friday 16th August 2013
quotequote all
From the modified speed six thread

4.5 ss upgraded

408 bhp/372 lbft
392 bhp/369 lbft
418 bhp/360 lbft

Can the difference just be down to cats?

Edited by WolfyJones on Friday 16th August 07:55

Jhonno

5,779 posts

142 months

Friday 16th August 2013
quotequote all
WolfyJones said:
spitfire4v8 said:
^^ and in any case the cats aren't that restrictive .. I've no idea where numbers of 40-50bhp gains come from decatted, try 7 or 8 hp!
That was also my understanding, and doesn't decatting also bring the torque down?
Maybe its got a blocked cat????
Subjective feeling.. If they rob top end, they'll make the bottom end feel stronger.

glow worm

Original Poster:

5,867 posts

228 months

Monday 19th August 2013
quotequote all
Had my mechanic take it out for a test drive today... He was very impressed... driveability means a lot more to me than numbers. smile
Those standard 4 litre Sags are very poor smile . Loads more torque with a Tuscan .

Doms 5 Litre vs a 4 Litre Sag .. I think TVR told a few lies.






Edited by glow worm on Monday 19th August 19:16