4.3 TVR Power speed 6

4.3 TVR Power speed 6

Author
Discussion

cmr2payne

Original Poster:

1,129 posts

234 months

Friday 26th September 2008
quotequote all
Doms just finished mapping a customers 4.3 car.. here were the results


Standard Tuscan "S" 304 BHP with 267 ftlbs torque @ the rear
wheels (green line)

Tvr Power 4.3 ltr 370 Bhp with 341 ftlbs torque @the rear wheels

Tvr Power 4.3 ltr with nitrous 457 Bhp with 448 ftlbs torque @ the rear wheels


NTEL

5,051 posts

240 months

Friday 26th September 2008
quotequote all
Good numbers from the 4.3 clap But the 4.0L "S" figures are crap!!!! Even my remapped standard 4.0L makes 322bhp and 297 ftlbs (at the wheels) on Doms Dyno.

I understand from Dom that the new 4.3 also comes with a 3 year / unlimited milage warranty. smile

HarryW

15,150 posts

269 months

Friday 26th September 2008
quotequote all
Staggered by the torque curves of all those S6's.
I bet the NoS one is bit lively hehe

ceejay

1,274 posts

254 months

Friday 26th September 2008
quotequote all
The 4.0S figures are a bit on the low side but fall within the typical S engine bracket. It's interesting to see that the S engine makes its power all the way up to 7K rpm as it should, while the 4.3 seems to peak just after 6K. Again just what you'd expect.

The torque figures look very promising. Perhaps I should give Dom a call before buying an AJP8 scratchchin

Barry Ashcroft

1,958 posts

221 months

Friday 26th September 2008
quotequote all
NTEL said:
I understand from Dom that the new 4.3 also comes with a 3 year / unlimited milage warranty. smile
I bet fitting the NOS invalidates it

batman0404

90 posts

192 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
Why use nitrous?
Do you really want to blow it up before it blows up on its own accord??

yzf1070

814 posts

231 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
batman0404 said:
Why use nitrous?
Do you really want to blow it up before it blows up on its own accord??
TROLL vomit

Top marks to Dom and the chaps at Power

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

191 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
Is it just me or does anyone else find that dyno read-outs for the S6 never match the way the car feels like it makes its power. I would have expected a fairly noticable change in rate of power increase from 5K onwards with the standard S engine?

Fairly uniform from 3.5 - 6 then tailing off just appears wrong confused

Edited by TVR_owner on Saturday 27th September 06:12

shaunsmith

1,226 posts

217 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
Is it just me or does anyone else find that dyno read-outs for the S6 never match the way the car feels like it makes its power. I would have expected a fairly noticable change in rate of power increase from 5K onwards with the standard S engine?

Fairly uniform from 3.5 - 6 then tailing off just appears wrong confused

Edited by TVR_owner on Saturday 27th September 06:12
Yeah, I agree the power output the Speed Six puts out on paper certainly doesn't match the way it feels in reality especially the one I used to have in my Tuscan S. Good post.

I often wondered that myself over the years.

S5TVR

1,239 posts

233 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
Is it just me or does anyone else find that dyno read-outs for the S6 never match the way the car feels like it makes its power. I would have expected a fairly noticable change in rate of power increase from 5K onwards with the standard S engine?
Fairly uniform from 3.5 - 6 then tailing off just appears wrong confused
To be honest I have difficulty in believing the 4.3 figures. 370 bhp at the wheels when one of the quickest and most sorted Tuscan S's I know of makes 302 bhp at the wheels but on a different set of rollers. Another 68 bhp for a 0.3 litre increase in capacity - hard to believe. What's the answer then ? - we're back to different dyno's again. I have, first hand, seen a supercharged Chim 500 lose 50 bhp in 12 hours when being run on Power's dyno followed by SRR's dyno.

Whitey

2,508 posts

284 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
thats the problem, different dyno's etc. My mighty 06 factory rebuild S/Sag spec engine with RR steel crank made 305bhp at the wheels at the SRR. I've never run it on another dyno, but plenty use the SRR and Joolz has the same dyno, so good for comparisons.


ceejay

1,274 posts

254 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
Is it just me or does anyone else find that dyno read-outs for the S6 never match the way the car feels like it makes its power. I would have expected a fairly noticable change in rate of power increase from 5K onwards with the standard S engine?

Fairly uniform from 3.5 - 6 then tailing off just appears wrong confused

Edited by TVR_owner on Saturday 27th September 06:12
I don't think the graph scales help much.

I've just looked at my numerous speed 6 traces and to be fair the power delivery is pretty much uniform (near enough a straight line). Torque on the other hand rises more rapidly from 4.5K rpm to a peak at about 6k then tails off pretty darn quickly. I'd say 4.5k to 6K is probably where the engines I had felt strongest. I found the performance at 7K and above very disappointing but at least it made a nice noise.

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

191 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
ceejay said:
TVR_owner said:
Is it just me or does anyone else find that dyno read-outs for the S6 never match the way the car feels like it makes its power. I would have expected a fairly noticable change in rate of power increase from 5K onwards with the standard S engine?

Fairly uniform from 3.5 - 6 then tailing off just appears wrong confused

Edited by TVR_owner on Saturday 27th September 06:12
I don't think the graph scales help much.

I've just looked at my numerous speed 6 traces and to be fair the power delivery is pretty much uniform (near enough a straight line). Torque on the other hand rises more rapidly from 4.5K rpm to a peak at about 6k then tails off pretty darn quickly. I'd say 4.5k to 6K is probably where the engines I had felt strongest. I found the performance at 7K and above very disappointing but at least it made a nice noise.
I acnt honestly remember anymore Cliff. My Sagaris hasn't turned a wheel since May (the 3000M is much more fun)

ceejay

1,274 posts

254 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
You can't beat a classic....especially if it's a racer. Hope to see you at Oulton.

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

191 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
ceejay said:
You can't beat a classic....especially if it's a racer. Hope to see you at Oulton.
You will, car now with CR T5 (rather than the old 4 speed) and about 35 Kilos lighter...drivers still heavy though! laugh

ceejay

1,274 posts

254 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
Have you gone for a dogbox or one of CT's kits? 35kg is a lot of weight, you will have to put the wheels back on before Oulton!!!! Look forward to seeing you there.

Tvr Power

1,076 posts

206 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
yzf1070 said:
batman0404 said:
Why use nitrous?
Do you really want to blow it up before it blows up on its own accord??
TROLL vomit

Top marks to Dom and the chaps at Power
Nitrous was my personal option this was just to show that Speed Six engines can take extreme power increases, has for the nitrous kits if fitted by Tvr Power 3 year unlimited mileage warranty will still be valid

Dom

Tvr Power

1,076 posts

206 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
S5TVR said:
TVR_owner said:
Is it just me or does anyone else find that dyno read-outs for the S6 never match the way the car feels like it makes its power. I would have expected a fairly noticable change in rate of power increase from 5K onwards with the standard S engine?
Fairly uniform from 3.5 - 6 then tailing off just appears wrong confused
To be honest I have difficulty in believing the 4.3 figures. 370 bhp at the wheels when one of the quickest and most sorted Tuscan S's I know of makes 302 bhp at the wheels but on a different set of rollers. Another 68 bhp for a 0.3 litre increase in capacity - hard to believe. What's the answer then ? - we're back to different dyno's again. I have, first hand, seen a supercharged Chim 500 lose 50 bhp in 12 hours when being run on Power's dyno followed by SRR's dyno.
Feel free to take our 4.3ltr on any other rolling road

Dom

NTEL

5,051 posts

240 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
Tvr Power said:
as for the nitrous kits if fitted by Tvr Power 3 year unlimited mileage warranty will still be valid

Dom
Well, thats from the horses mouth, and you can't get fairer than that!!!

Nice one Dom thumbup

Edited by NTEL on Saturday 27th September 17:20

tail slide

2,168 posts

247 months

Saturday 27th September 2008
quotequote all
NTEL said:
Tvr Power said:
Feel free to take our 4.3ltr on any other rolling road

Dom

as for the nitrous kits if fitted by Tvr Power 3 year unlimited mileage warranty will still be valid

Dom
Well, thats from the horses mouth, and you can't get fairer than that!!!

Nice one Dom thumbup
Agreed.

Respect to the man that stands firmly by his claims, and although Dom hardly needs me to say it, the 4.3 power & torque curves look convincing IMO (even if 4.0 is a bit low).

For driver's impression of acceleration, my experience has always been that above peak torque rpm in any engine, if there is a steady fall in torque that is mirrored by a climb in power, the feeling when driving is the line between the two, ie. same acceleration throughout mid to high rpm, which is very effective. smile



Edited by tail slide on Saturday 27th September 23:13