Get on with it!

Author
Discussion

FlyingFin

176 posts

131 months

Thursday 11th June 2015
quotequote all
Brian Trizers said:
where imagining dragons around every corner
Please dont tell me my ex has moved to the Chilterns.... wink



Always drive expecting there to be the proverbial Rhinoceros around the bend having a poo, and, in such a manner that you can stop should you meet yourself coming in the other direction!




TTFN

Brian Trizers

66 posts

109 months

Thursday 11th June 2015
quotequote all
FlyingFin said:
Please don't tell me my ex has moved to the Chilterns.
I was only imagining, FF. Could be anywhere. In fact, could be behind you right now!eek

Z.B

224 posts

178 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
I might forgive a little hesitancy. Exasperating as it can be, tolerance is important on the road. 'Righteous indignation' is one of the worst traits in a driver and usually comprises an unreasonable response followed by an even more unreasonable reaction.

Mind you, I have noticed recently a growing number of drivers who clearly lack basic knowledge. Stationary at a flashing amber pelican crossing with no pedestrians in sight is popular. Also I see an amazing number of drivers who don't understand filter arrows. Turning right off a main road with lights on green they will sit and wait for the filter to come on - which it never will (at this particular junction) if there is no oncoming traffic to make the filter necessary. I've seen people wait for several cycles. Extraordinary! Get a move on!

Red Devil

13,060 posts

208 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
I don't recall having encountered a right turn filter traffic light which functions in the way you mention. Where is it?

greygoose

8,260 posts

195 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
I was reminded of this thread yesterday when following a car down a single lane slip road onto the motorway, the young woman driving accelerated to the giddy heights of 35mph to join the motorway, they were following a camper van but this vehicle had disappeared off into the distance long ago.

giantdefy

684 posts

113 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
FlyingFin said:
Always drive expecting there to be the proverbial Rhinoceros around the bend having a poo, and, in such a manner that you can stop should you meet yourself coming in the other direction!
Always a possibility up at Whipsnade :-)

Z.B

224 posts

178 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
I don't recall having encountered a right turn filter traffic light which functions in the way you mention. Where is it?
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Woolshops+Shop...

Here, junction of King Street and Charles Street. I think they're fairly common, it's just you would rarely notice when driving - not surprising when you think about it.

gshughes

1,277 posts

255 months

Thursday 13th August 2015
quotequote all
Brake said:
Overtaking is dangerous because is impossible to accurately judge the speed and distance of approaching traffic.
What a load of rubbish! It can be a bit tricky to judge the speed of oncoming traffic, but the distance is relatively easy to judge.

Gary C

12,431 posts

179 months

Thursday 13th August 2015
quotequote all
giantdefy said:
FlyingFin said:
Always drive expecting there to be the proverbial Rhinoceros around the bend having a poo, and, in such a manner that you can stop should you meet yourself coming in the other direction!
Always a possibility up at Whipsnade :-)
Met a bloody cow doing that once.

Coming round a tightening bend to find cow standing across the road !

Lifted of sharply, hit the brakes and momentarily locked the inside front wheel (no abs)

Who says the 80's air cooled 911's have savage lift of oversteer.

RobM77

35,349 posts

234 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
I'm firmly of the opinion that if people don't feel safe going any faster, then they're better off at the speed they choose, and by that I mean speed of decisions as well as actual ground covered. If more people realised their limitations in terms of information processing and decision making, then the roads would be a much safer place; slower, yes, but safer.

However, I would like those people who choose to drive slowly and make decisions slowly to tolerate and understand that other people and other cars may be safe at a higher speed or making decisions more quickly. For example, I would like the right to patiently follow someone at 30mph in a 60 limit until I reach a safe overtaking place and then overtake them safely without getting offensive symbols out of the window and main beam dazzling me.

WD39

20,083 posts

116 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
I see a lot of people who are indecisive about overtaking but then go for it when the ideal moment has passed. They'll be, "Shall I, shan't I?" until they're three quarters of the way down the straight, then close to the next bend they'll choose to go and end up on the wrong side of double white lines with only luck preventing a head on collision with something going the opposite way.

A proper plan to overtake the vehicle in front would allow them to look for an overtaking opportunity and take it as it arises rather than spontaneously thinking they might just have a go at it when they see a bit of straight road. It would also allow those behind who are observant enough to read their behaviour to identify they're definitely looking for an overtake, and so know they shouldn't try to overtake them, and to overtake after them on longer straights.
I think I've cracked this one.

I don't overtake. Haven't done for ages. Dual carriageways, farm traffic, yes. But otherwise I'm happy to wait, leaving a gap for anyone wishing to O/T me.

Far more relaxing. Just me and LVB.

Blakewater

4,309 posts

157 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
WD39 said:
Blakewater said:
I see a lot of people who are indecisive about overtaking but then go for it when the ideal moment has passed. They'll be, "Shall I, shan't I?" until they're three quarters of the way down the straight, then close to the next bend they'll choose to go and end up on the wrong side of double white lines with only luck preventing a head on collision with something going the opposite way.

A proper plan to overtake the vehicle in front would allow them to look for an overtaking opportunity and take it as it arises rather than spontaneously thinking they might just have a go at it when they see a bit of straight road. It would also allow those behind who are observant enough to read their behaviour to identify they're definitely looking for an overtake, and so know they shouldn't try to overtake them, and to overtake after them on longer straights.
I think I've cracked this one.

I don't overtake. Haven't done for ages. Dual carriageways, farm traffic, yes. But otherwise I'm happy to wait, leaving a gap for anyone wishing to O/T me.

Far more relaxing. Just me and LVB.
As has been said before though, people not knowing how to overtake because they don't think it's for them, and is only something maniacs do, then go to pieces when confronted by tractors, horse riders, cyclists and other road users even they want to get past. With tractors they tend to miss endless safe overtaking opportunities before going for a dangerous one. With horse riders and cyclists they tend to just drive past them like they aren't there. What the more vulnerable road users interpret as impatience and willful aggression is often just complete cluelessness about how to carry out a safe overtake and not seeing the process of getting past those road users as overtaking. If you can pass a cyclist and a tractor safely you can pass a faster car or lorry safely and it may be less stressful than being part of the hold up that other people are taking impatient risks to get past.

WD39

20,083 posts

116 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
WD39 said:
Blakewater said:
I see a lot of people who are indecisive about overtaking but then go for it when the ideal moment has passed. They'll be, "Shall I, shan't I?" until they're three quarters of the way down the straight, then close to the next bend they'll choose to go and end up on the wrong side of double white lines with only luck preventing a head on collision with something going the opposite way.

A proper plan to overtake the vehicle in front would allow them to look for an overtaking opportunity and take it as it arises rather than spontaneously thinking they might just have a go at it when they see a bit of straight road. It would also allow those behind who are observant enough to read their behaviour to identify they're definitely looking for an overtake, and so know they shouldn't try to overtake them, and to overtake after them on longer straights.
I think I've cracked this one.

I don't overtake. Haven't done for ages. Dual carriageways, farm traffic, yes. But otherwise I'm happy to wait, leaving a gap for anyone wishing to O/T me.

Far more relaxing. Just me and LVB.
As has been said before though, people not knowing how to overtake because they don't think it's for them, and is only something maniacs do, then go to pieces when confronted by tractors, horse riders, cyclists and other road users even they want to get past. With tractors they tend to miss endless safe overtaking opportunities before going for a dangerous one. With horse riders and cyclists they tend to just drive past them like they aren't there. What the more vulnerable road users interpret as impatience and willful aggression is often just complete cluelessness about how to carry out a safe overtake and not seeing the process of getting past those road users as overtaking. If you can pass a cyclist and a tractor safely you can pass a faster car or lorry safely and it may be less stressful than being part of the hold up that other people are taking impatient risks to get past.
When I was a boy racer, Hillman Imp, 1970's in Kent, I used to overtake with the best, or worst, of them. These days there is just no hurry for me. As stated, I always leave plenty of space for others to o/t me.
Everyone is happpy, surely. I'm not talking about tortoise speeds either. A goood average speed gets me to my destination in good time. I do have my moments though. There was this bloke the other day.......

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
WD39 said:
When I was a boy racer, Hillman Imp, 1970's in Kent, I used to overtake with the best, or worst, of them. These days there is just no hurry for me. As stated, I always leave plenty of space for others to o/t me.
Everyone is happpy, surely. I'm not talking about tortoise speeds either. A goood average speed gets me to my destination in good time. I do have my moments though. There was this bloke the other day.......
But if you've caught up with someone else, they must be going slower than your no hurry but not tortoise speed. So if there is an opportunity to pass safely and regain your desired speed why on earth not take it?

WD39

20,083 posts

116 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
WD39 said:
When I was a boy racer, Hillman Imp, 1970's in Kent, I used to overtake with the best, or worst, of them. These days there is just no hurry for me. As stated, I always leave plenty of space for others to o/t me.
Everyone is happpy, surely. I'm not talking about tortoise speeds either. A goood average speed gets me to my destination in good time. I do have my moments though. There was this bloke the other day.......
But if you've caught up with someone else, they must be going slower than your no hurry but not tortoise speed. So if there is an opportunity to pass safely and regain your desired speed why on earth not take it?
Exactly. If I catch up with someone then I adopt their speed. Unless, as I said previously, it is crawling traffic ie farm vehicles etc.



Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
WD39 said:
Exactly. If I catch up with someone then I adopt their speed. Unless, as I said previously, it is crawling traffic ie farm vehicles etc.
Why? What benefit do you derive from not taking a safe overtaking opportunity? Why not drive slower in the first place?

JonV8V

7,226 posts

124 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
WD39 said:
Exactly. If I catch up with someone then I adopt their speed. Unless, as I said previously, it is crawling traffic ie farm vehicles etc.
Why? What benefit do you derive from not taking a safe overtaking opportunity? Why not drive slower in the first place?
I've no idea why you're pushing this.

It's called free choice. Why would anyone ever let someone out of a side road? Why do some days I want to get a move on and other days want to drive in a more relaxed way? WD39 can do what they want rather than overtake at every opportunity

Edited by JonV8V on Monday 7th September 20:16

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

191 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Why? What benefit do you derive from not taking a safe overtaking opportunity? Why not drive slower in the first place?
Save fuel? wink

WD39

20,083 posts

116 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
JonV8V said:
Dr Jekyll said:
WD39 said:
Exactly. If I catch up with someone then I adopt their speed. Unless, as I said previously, it is crawling traffic ie farm vehicles etc.
Why? What benefit do you derive from not taking a safe overtaking opportunity? Why not drive slower in the first place?
I've no idea why you're pushing this.

It's called free choice. Why would anyone ever let someone out of a side road? Why do some days I want to get a move on and other days want to drive in a more relaxed way? WD39 can do what they want rather than overtake at every opportunity

Edited by JonV8V on Monday 7th September 20:16
Thank you JonV8V. Some reasoned thoughts at last.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
WD39 said:
JonV8V said:
Dr Jekyll said:
WD39 said:
Exactly. If I catch up with someone then I adopt their speed. Unless, as I said previously, it is crawling traffic ie farm vehicles etc.
Why? What benefit do you derive from not taking a safe overtaking opportunity? Why not drive slower in the first place?
I've no idea why you're pushing this.

It's called free choice. Why would anyone ever let someone out of a side road? Why do some days I want to get a move on and other days want to drive in a more relaxed way? WD39 can do what they want rather than overtake at every opportunity

Edited by JonV8V on Monday 7th September 20:16
Thank you JonV8V. Some reasoned thoughts at last.
Taking a safe opportunity to overtake a slower moving vehicle is a perfectly reasonable manoeuvre.

I've no idea what letting people out of side roads or some days driving in a more relaxed way has to do with it.

The point is that if you have decided that (EG) 40MPH is the optimum speed for a particular piece of road on a particular journey, and you come up behind someone doing a speed which you have already decided is inappropriately slow, taking an overtaking opportunity that presents itself is perfectly sensible. If the slower vehicle wasn't there would you slow down anyway?

If you are sitting at a set of traffic lights and don't bother to go when the light is green and it's perfectly clear but sit dithering for a while or wait for the next couple of changes. Is that a reasonable choice? No, it's sloppy.