Im a car design student and im conducting Research,Ques-here
Discussion
waremark said:
Is that what Spyker attempted - sort of?
Pagani, Koenigsegg and Tesla have all demonstrated that you can build a car brand from scratch if you can make a sufficiently desirable product.
If you could manage Tesla quality engineering, there might be a market for a much more expensive equivalent to the model S but with higher quality materials and finishes and a promise of more exclusivity.
To be fair, Tesla have demonstrated that you can burn really stupidly large amounts of money just to sell a relatively small number of cars.Pagani, Koenigsegg and Tesla have all demonstrated that you can build a car brand from scratch if you can make a sufficiently desirable product.
If you could manage Tesla quality engineering, there might be a market for a much more expensive equivalent to the model S but with higher quality materials and finishes and a promise of more exclusivity.
waremark said:
Lester H said:
Kezington said:
1. What are your thoughts on a fully electric hyper car?
5. Would you own a fully electric hyper car if it were to match everything the current standing competition holds and more range? (Porsche 918, Pagani Hayura, Laferrari, Mclaren P1, Bugatti Veyron)
6. How does a 180k – 200k sound to you for a fully electric hyper car? What would you expect from it looking at its price?
6) Too dear, even if had funds, over £100k is too much if vehicle is to sell .
5. Would you own a fully electric hyper car if it were to match everything the current standing competition holds and more range? (Porsche 918, Pagani Hayura, Laferrari, Mclaren P1, Bugatti Veyron)
6. How does a 180k – 200k sound to you for a fully electric hyper car? What would you expect from it looking at its price?
6) Too dear, even if had funds, over £100k is too much if vehicle is to sell .
Quite so. My point referred to cars that sell to the well heeled, but not the superich, money no object buyers. Presumably ( and we were asked to support an undergraduate design student) the former group represent a better business model.
Edited by Lester H on Thursday 15th December 22:01
waremark said:
If you could manage Tesla quality engineering, there might be a market for a much more expensive equivalent to the model S but with higher quality materials and finishes and a promise of more exclusivity.
I've seen first hand the quality level of the Tesla X - it's poor for what's essentially an SUV that reminds me of a Honda CRV but with gull wing doors and a price tag of around 80k .. examine the door rubbers, trim etc and it's all a bit ... meh. Not worth it at all imho.The model S is the attractive one in the line-up for me but when I catch an eye on the front/side of it, it looks like a stretched 2016 Ford Focus.
Might be just me.
Lester H said:
Quite so. My point referred to cars that sell to the well heeled, but not the superich, money no object buyers. Presumably ( and we were asked to support an undergraduate design student) the former group represent a better business model.
The OP asked about a hypercar and listed the £1m plus models. He then asked about a supercar price. Pagani and Koenigsegg have successfully entered the hypercar market on much smaller budgets than McLaren needed for the supercar market. waremark said:
The OP asked about a hypercar and listed the £1m plus models. He then asked about a supercar price. Pagani and Koenigsegg have successfully entered the hypercar market on much smaller budgets than McLaren needed for the supercar market.
Supercars need to be mass manufactured - that means type approval, crash testing, and all of that jazz. Owners will also expect to be able to use it as a daily driver, even if they don't. If you only make a dozen cars that doesn't apply; so the barrier to entering the hypercar market is a bit lower than that for the supercar market.Gassing Station | Advanced Driving | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff