Slip road merging, why is it so hard?

Slip road merging, why is it so hard?

Author
Discussion

Pit Pony

8,731 posts

122 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
aturnick54 said:
Or alternatively a suitable dual carriageway. A38/A30 are perfectly adequate for this.
Despite living is Merseyside, whilst my daughter was learning to drive, we took her to the A50, between Derby and Stoke, to learn how to leave and join using a slip road. Much to her amusement, I made her come off at every junction, do 360 degs at the roundabout and then rejoin. It's actually harder than joining a motorway, because only 2 lanes, and no hard shoulder, (or the bottle out lane, as I like to call it)
(I had a contract in Derby at the time, so her and my wife came down for a few days to stay with me)

Sensibleboy

1,144 posts

126 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
MitchT said:
Me too. If I'm on a busy motorway I move into L2 when I'm passing the exit slip so I don't find myself with a car trying to merge from my left and someone on my right preventing me from moving over if I've left it till the last minute
Even if there's nothing coming down the slip road?

Forester1965

1,732 posts

4 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Sensibleboy said:
Even if there's nothing coming down the slip road?
He doesn't know if there's anyone on the slip road, that's why he wants to move across.

Super Sonic

4,998 posts

55 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
vaderface said:
I,ll go against most here. I,am with the Op. People joining at 40mph shouldn't be forcing people doing 60mph in lane 1 into lane 2 as IMHO that the slows down lane 2 who might be doing 70mph, then 3 and so on. M56 everyday....
Oh and people who get straight into lane 2 on the join slip doing said 40mph, idiots.

Edited by vaderface on Tuesday 16th April 15:55
Op said the van matched his speed at 70.

aturnick54

Original Poster:

1,102 posts

29 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Ken_Code said:
If they were compulsory then you’d have learned that moving into lane 2 well ahead of the slip road joining is a sensible and considerate thing to do.
Considerate, but not always possible when there's a vehicle already there.

aturnick54

Original Poster:

1,102 posts

29 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
DanL said:
They’re also clearly st at driving, as evidenced by the idea that they can get “stuck” in lane 2 if they move over, and their failure to anticipate or accommodate other road users by driving defensively.
If you've ever driven a HGV in this situation you'll understand what I mean. Limited to 56, drivers on the inside then sit around at the same speed. It happens all the time, hence why most HGV drivers don't bother moving over for cars anymore.

If people wish to have a game of chicken with a truck which has priority, that's their choice. It's not a wise move.

Veryoldbear

219 posts

105 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Around here (Oxfordshire) we have the evil A34 which has dreadful short slip roads and heavy traffic. I find that the best technique is to get onto the slip road quite slowly, look around everywhere and when the opportunity arises, stamp very hard on the go pedal and take posession of the gap ...

aturnick54

Original Poster:

1,102 posts

29 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
Despite living is Merseyside, whilst my daughter was learning to drive, we took her to the A50, between Derby and Stoke, to learn how to leave and join using a slip road. Much to her amusement, I made her come off at every junction, do 360 degs at the roundabout and then rejoin. It's actually harder than joining a motorway, because only 2 lanes, and no hard shoulder, (or the bottle out lane, as I like to call it)
(I had a contract in Derby at the time, so her and my wife came down for a few days to stay with me)
I think you're right, and also much less likely for a car in lane one to be able to move over into lane two to allow you to join on a two lane dual carriageway. You have to adapt your speed and find a suitable gap.

whimsical ninja

151 posts

28 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
This sounds like it's nothing to do with technical driving ability; I'm sure the OP is perfectly capable.

It sounds like a question of attitude. The OP is obviously a very selfish individual and this is reflected in their driving.

Super Sonic

4,998 posts

55 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
You cannot control other people's driving, you can only control your own.
If you consider yourself an average or good driver, it follows that a lot of the other drivers are not as good as you.
If you're good at driving, you should be able to anticipate and mitigate other people's bad driving.
Having to slam on the brakes at 70 on a motorway because you haven't anticipated a vehicle approaching from a slip road is not good driving. Bear in mind that you will have approached from his blind spot as he was accelerating up to 70. If you are involved in an accident that you could have easily avoided, you will be as much as fault as the van driver, no matter who had priority.

DanL

6,240 posts

266 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
aturnick54 said:
DanL said:
They’re also clearly st at driving, as evidenced by the idea that they can get “stuck” in lane 2 if they move over, and their failure to anticipate or accommodate other road users by driving defensively.
If you've ever driven a HGV in this situation you'll understand what I mean. Limited to 56, drivers on the inside then sit around at the same speed. It happens all the time, hence why most HGV drivers don't bother moving over for cars anymore.

If people wish to have a game of chicken with a truck which has priority, that's their choice. It's not a wise move.
You were in an HGV doing 70 mph now, were you? biggrin

and31

3,090 posts

128 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
I’m a lorry driver, I’ll always move over to lane two and let someone on if possible,but sometimes it simply isn’t , but then I get a car on a slip road match my speed,I’ll always back off to let someone on as well, but a surprising amount of people wanting to join the main carriageway slow down if I back off! It happens so often.
Just accelerate and get in front of me ffs.

MitchT

15,928 posts

210 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
Sensibleboy said:
Even if there's nothing coming down the slip road?
He doesn't know if there's anyone on the slip road, that's why he wants to move across.
Exactly. I move across when I'm passing the exit slip in case there's someone wanting to merge by the time I reach the entry slip... generally just when it's busy, to mitigate the risk of not being able to move to L2 if I leave it until I reach the entry slip and then someone's wanting to merge but someone else is on my right. Just helps to minimise conflict. I can always move back to L1 if I can see no one on the entry slip by the time I get there.

snuffy

9,857 posts

285 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
If I'm in lane 1 and I can see there are vehicles on the on-slip then I will always move to lane 2 if I can. If not, I will either speed up to allow space behind me, or if that's not possible, then back off to let them in in front of me.

Scarletpimpofnel

718 posts

19 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Gary C said:
had this a couple of times

Short slip road, accelerate but knob in lane one refuses to move into lane two to allow you to smoothly move into lane one.

Thing is, in L1 you have time to judge, anticipate and adjust speed & position. On some slip roads in the UK you only see the traffic speed and position quite late with limited time to view, adjust and manoeuvre especially in an underpowered car/van.

Of course its for both to anticipate, but if you get a bloody minded driver in L1 who sits at a fixed speed and isn't prepared to do their part it can cause 'issues'.
There is in fact an option where you join L1 BEHIND the car already in it; a brake pedal exists in addition to the accelerator pedal to allow this manoeuvre to take place!!!

I drive defensively where ever possible and my observations are that most argy-bargey on the roads is because the male of the species (always men) cannot and will not accept tucking in behind another road user instead of in front.

I a quite happy with drivers in L1 maintaining a constant speed as it's easy to judge where they'll be and decide to go in front or behind.

aturnick54

Original Poster:

1,102 posts

29 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
DanL said:
You were in an HGV doing 70 mph now, were you? biggrin
On the occasion in the original post, no. I was in a car.

aturnick54

Original Poster:

1,102 posts

29 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Scarletpimpofnel said:
There is in fact an option where you join L1 BEHIND the car already in it; a brake pedal exists in addition to the accelerator pedal to allow this manoeuvre to take place!!!

I drive defensively where ever possible and my observations are that most argy-bargey on the roads is because the male of the species (always men) cannot and will not accept tucking in behind another road user instead of in front.

I a quite happy with drivers in L1 maintaining a constant speed as it's easy to judge where they'll be and decide to go in front or behind.
I agree with you. Many on this thread have commented that the vehicle in lane one should adjust their speed. When in fact it should be the vehicle joining that adjusts their speed to find a suitable gap instead.

Personally I'd prefer people in lane one to maintain speed when I'm joining so that we don't both end up speeding up/slowing down at the same time.

soupdragon1

4,092 posts

98 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Strange thread. It's supposed to be about general standards of driving and people just pull the OPs driving apart instead.

The OP is talking common sense here. If people on the road are driving poorly, do we all just pander to their poor skills by rolling out the red carpet by giving way and reinforcing their impression that it's the correct procedure?

It appears that this is the theme of the thread and I can't agree at all. If you sense any danger then of course you make sure that you take corrective action. But in a situation like the OP is describing, I would look across at the driver and gesture for them to go in front on me, but I wouldn't change my speed. Ie, there is plenty of room, get your speed to the appropriate level mate, and that's your job in this scenario.

If I feel they're completely incapable of carrying our such a simple task, I would slow down, let them in and then overtake them shortly after. Always best to have bad drivers behind you rather than in front. It's not hard to merge into a motorway but we have to appreciate some people might struggle.

Each scenario is different though. Rush hour, that dodgy bumper to bumper type motorway at a fairly high speed, I would be defensive mode and be on high alert to merging traffic and I would drive much more passively, like most people.

But to say that in general driving, the OP should roll out the red carpet for the merging car is wrong in my opinion. It just reinforces their bad driving. They just need to merge like a normal person merges.

turbomoggie

152 posts

105 months

Wednesday 17th April
quotequote all
OP I agree with your sentiments but in real life it's easier just to try and be cooperative by slightly speeding up/slowing down to let people in.
It's better to do this and reduce your/their chances of not getting to your destination safely.

JackJarvis

2,265 posts

135 months

Wednesday 17th April
quotequote all
I can't think of an occasion in 25 years of driving where I've had this issue. It's probably because I work on the assumption that every other driver is a useless idiot, until they prove otherwise. I minimise risk and make space for people. Forget about what 'should' happen, that means nothing.



Edited by JackJarvis on Wednesday 17th April 09:49