Slip road on to a motorway

Slip road on to a motorway

Author
Discussion

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

226 months

Monday 1st February 2010
quotequote all
I think you're going to struggle to get any traction with this. Even at extremely busy times, it's possible to join the motorway; I think it's fair to say that the vast majority of people who end up stopped on the slip would, if they were honest, admit that they cocked it up. Either they didn't plan far enough ahead, or they were insufficiently decisive, or they simply didn't take the gap that was afforded them.

I also don't think it happens all that often.

bluetone

2,047 posts

219 months

Monday 1st February 2010
quotequote all
I did not want to revert to the manual on this one but here goes:

The Highway Code said:
Driving on the motorway
259
Joining the motorway. When you join the motorway you will normally approach it from a road on the left (a slip road) or from an adjoining motorway. You should;

  • give priority to traffic already on the motorway
  • check the traffic on the motorway and match your speed to fit safely into the traffic flow in the left-hand lane
*not cross solid white lines that separate lanes or use the hard shoulder
  • stay on the slip road if it continues as an extra lane on the motorway
  • remain in the left-hand lane long enough to adjust to the speed of traffic before considering overtaking
The Highway Code said:
Lane discipline
264
You should always drive in the left-hand lane when the road ahead is clear. If you are overtaking a number of slower-moving vehicles, you should return to the left-hand lane as soon as you are safely past. Slow-moving or speed-restricted vehicles should always remain in the left-hand lane of the carriageway unless overtaking. You MUST NOT drive on the hard shoulder except in an emergency or if directed to do so by the police, HA traffic officers in uniform or by signs.
A merge should not be considered an emergency and I'm sure the BiB would be having words/fines/points with you..



Edited by bluetone on Monday 1st February 13:41

StevenJJ

541 posts

209 months

Monday 1st February 2010
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
should of figured it all out before you hit 70 anyway.
Not always possible.

One arrives here trying to go North and there is either space for you or there isn't; you cannot plan and there is nowhere to go. Stationary traffic waiting to join is not unusual.

Z.B

224 posts

178 months

Monday 1st February 2010
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
What do you do entering a modern dual carriageway from a slip road with no hard shoulder when there's no space then ?

Edited by vonhosen on Sunday 31st January 18:22
Is that aimed at me?

I'm not sure exactly what situation you envisage, but I have (and I am going to use this word on this occassion) never felt the need to use the hard shoulder in this way regardless of whether there is one - though I'm quite pleased to have it available as a last ditch escape route.

The only situations where I might stop or slow down drastically would be slow moving traffic on the carriageway (in which case I am still effectively matching my speed) or under length slip roads - in which case I would be making a planned pause with plenty of room to accelerate ahead of me, not doing a panic stop where the slip road ends.

My point is that stopping at the end of a slip road surrounded by fast moving traffic makes you a sitting duck. You have the threat from traffic on the carriageway, plus a worse threat from other drivers coming down the slip road towards you at 70+mph and mostly concerned with looking in their mirrors. And once you stop you need a much bigger gap to move off into - a gap which may never materialise!!

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2010
quotequote all
Z.B said:
vonhosen said:
What do you do entering a modern dual carriageway from a slip road with no hard shoulder when there's no space then ?
Is that aimed at me?

I'm not sure exactly what situation you envisage, but I have (and I am going to use this word on this occassion) never felt the need to use the hard shoulder in this way regardless of whether there is one - though I'm quite pleased to have it available as a last ditch escape route.

The only situations where I might stop or slow down drastically would be slow moving traffic on the carriageway (in which case I am still effectively matching my speed) or under length slip roads - in which case I would be making a planned pause with plenty of room to accelerate ahead of me, not doing a panic stop where the slip road ends.

My point is that stopping at the end of a slip road surrounded by fast moving traffic makes you a sitting duck. You have the threat from traffic on the carriageway, plus a worse threat from other drivers coming down the slip road towards you at 70+mph and mostly concerned with looking in their mirrors. And once you stop you need a much bigger gap to move off into - a gap which may never materialise!!
It's just that you commanded 'don't do it' & whilst of course you should try to avoid it, that doesn't mean that there isn't the possibility that you are left with the choices of stopping on the slip road or forcing your way into flowing traffic (in the absence of a hard shoulder). I assume should that happen you're advocating just attempting to force your way in then ? (As it appears stopping is discounted by you in any circumstances where traffic in lane 1 on the live carriageway is travelling at speed).

Edited by vonhosen on Tuesday 2nd February 07:02

heebeegeetee

28,735 posts

248 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2010
quotequote all
One thing i would add, is that peeps should try to not aim to join the m'way at a point already occupied. That's what most people do. Most people don't start looking until the last moment either.

Plan early and aim for a gap, not a vehicle.

Z.B

224 posts

178 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2010
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
It's just that you commanded 'don't do it' & whilst of course you should try to avoid it, that doesn't mean that there isn't the possibility that you are left with the choices of stopping on the slip road or forcing your way into flowing traffic (in the absence of a hard shoulder). I assume should that happen you're advocating just attempting to force your way in then ? (As it appears stopping is discounted by you in any circumstances where traffic in lane 1 on the live carriageway is travelling at speed).

Edited by vonhosen on Tuesday 2nd February 07:02
I said I have never felt the need so far, not that it's inconceivable that I might in the future - but it is highly unlikely and highly undesirable. If traffic is travelling at speed, even given the high incidence of following too close, it seems unlikely that I would be unable to find a gap large enough to merge into.

I wouldn't 'force my way in' in the sense of causing other drivers to take evasive action, but in heavy traffic I would consider moving into a gap of a size which would induce the following driver to back off (or me to manipulate him into doing so) to restore a normal following distance. It's not ideal, and one could even argue that it technically breaches the law, but if it's the safest way to deal with the situation that's fine with me.

Traffic density has increased significantly since the relevant regulations were drawn up - and sometimes now a bit of give and take is required.

steviegasgas

417 posts

185 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2010
quotequote all
In all my years of HGV driving, home and abroad, I cannot remember once being stopped on a sliproad joining the motorway, much easier for the driver to plan ahead than change the highway rules governing the whole off the country!
Same applies in the car, and on the bike.
Plan ahead, yes in a contraflow it may be nose to tail, but again planning ahead will find someone to let you in, I just cannot see where you are going with this at all, sorry!!

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2010
quotequote all
Z.B said:
vonhosen said:
It's just that you commanded 'don't do it' & whilst of course you should try to avoid it, that doesn't mean that there isn't the possibility that you are left with the choices of stopping on the slip road or forcing your way into flowing traffic (in the absence of a hard shoulder). I assume should that happen you're advocating just attempting to force your way in then ? (As it appears stopping is discounted by you in any circumstances where traffic in lane 1 on the live carriageway is travelling at speed).

Edited by vonhosen on Tuesday 2nd February 07:02
I said I have never felt the need so far, not that it's inconceivable that I might in the future - but it is highly unlikely and highly undesirable. If traffic is travelling at speed, even given the high incidence of following too close, it seems unlikely that I would be unable to find a gap large enough to merge into.

I wouldn't 'force my way in' in the sense of causing other drivers to take evasive action, but in heavy traffic I would consider moving into a gap of a size which would induce the following driver to back off (or me to manipulate him into doing so) to restore a normal following distance. It's not ideal, and one could even argue that it technically breaches the law, but if it's the safest way to deal with the situation that's fine with me.

Traffic density has increased significantly since the relevant regulations were drawn up - and sometimes now a bit of give and take is required.
Ah right, so even though you said don't do it, it's conceivable that you yourself might in the future should circumstances dictate.

Marc W

3,782 posts

211 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
I've not ever had a problem myself, except for one near miss where a van ahead of me on the slip road decided to come to a sudden halt instead of trying to merge. Fortunately I was far enough behind him that I could get going and was able to merge when a gap in traffic soon appeared. I never did work out what he was doing, he was still there when I drove off and had made no attempt to get out or put on hazard lights to indicate a breakdown.

As for already being on the motorway I was always taught to move over if in the left hand lane when people are joining if it's safe to do so.

bluetone

2,047 posts

219 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
Marc W said:
As for already being on the motorway I was always taught to move over if in the left hand lane when people are joining if it's safe to do so.
yes When approching an on-slip on the motorway it is best practice surely to plan on the assumption that there will likely be someone wanting to join ie. make sure you have space to move into lane 2/3 if necessary.

dom180

1,180 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
bluetone said:
Marc W said:
As for already being on the motorway I was always taught to move over if in the left hand lane when people are joining if it's safe to do so.
yes When approching an on-slip on the motorway it is best practice surely to plan on the assumption that there will likely be someone wanting to join ie. make sure you have space to move into lane 2/3 if necessary.
Out of interest, if you're in lane 1 doing an actual 70-75 (GPS verified) and you're approaching a on-slip, if moving to the middle lane slightly inconveniences someone travelling faster in lane 2 a fair way behind, (not dangerous at all but they will be impacted a little if you maintain the same legal/legal plus tolerance speed), is the consensus that it is reasonable to move to lane 2 - I think it is of course, but in practise there seems increasingly little goodwill from those travelling significantly above the limit in lane 2 who almost always enjoy increasing speed to intimidate, and give you a flash when it would surely be easy for them to move to an unoccupied lane 3...





CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

226 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
dom180 said:
bluetone said:
Marc W said:
As for already being on the motorway I was always taught to move over if in the left hand lane when people are joining if it's safe to do so.
yes When approching an on-slip on the motorway it is best practice surely to plan on the assumption that there will likely be someone wanting to join ie. make sure you have space to move into lane 2/3 if necessary.
Out of interest, if you're in lane 1 doing an actual 70-75 (GPS verified) and you're approaching a on-slip, if moving to the middle lane slightly inconveniences someone travelling faster in lane 2 a fair way behind, (not dangerous at all but they will be impacted a little if you maintain the same legal/legal plus tolerance speed), is the consensus that it is reasonable to move to lane 2 - I think it is of course, but in practise there seems increasingly little goodwill from those travelling significantly above the limit in lane 2 who almost always enjoy increasing speed to intimidate, and give you a flash when it would surely be easy for them to move to an unoccupied lane 3...
If you pull into the path of someone else in order to help someone who hasn't got priority anyway, I think that counts as a bit rude (despite being well-intentioned).

dom180

1,180 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
dom180 said:
bluetone said:
Marc W said:
As for already being on the motorway I was always taught to move over if in the left hand lane when people are joining if it's safe to do so.
yes When approching an on-slip on the motorway it is best practice surely to plan on the assumption that there will likely be someone wanting to join ie. make sure you have space to move into lane 2/3 if necessary.
Out of interest, if you're in lane 1 doing an actual 70-75 (GPS verified) and you're approaching a on-slip, if moving to the middle lane slightly inconveniences someone travelling faster in lane 2 a fair way behind, (not dangerous at all but they will be impacted a little if you maintain the same legal/legal plus tolerance speed), is the consensus that it is reasonable to move to lane 2 - I think it is of course, but in practise there seems increasingly little goodwill from those travelling significantly above the limit in lane 2 who almost always enjoy increasing speed to intimidate, and give you a flash when it would surely be easy for them to move to an unoccupied lane 3...
If you pull into the path of someone else in order to help someone who hasn't got priority anyway, I think that counts as a bit rude (despite being well-intentioned).
It's not really pulling into the path (that's overstating it & not what I meant really) but it is slightly but they have plenty of time to adjust - surely it would be worse to stay in lane 1 with a lot of trafic joining?

In reality, I'd accelerate and increase speed so it wouldn't be an issue but if I were taking my test...?

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

226 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
dom180 said:
CommanderJameson said:
dom180 said:
bluetone said:
Marc W said:
As for already being on the motorway I was always taught to move over if in the left hand lane when people are joining if it's safe to do so.
yes When approching an on-slip on the motorway it is best practice surely to plan on the assumption that there will likely be someone wanting to join ie. make sure you have space to move into lane 2/3 if necessary.
Out of interest, if you're in lane 1 doing an actual 70-75 (GPS verified) and you're approaching a on-slip, if moving to the middle lane slightly inconveniences someone travelling faster in lane 2 a fair way behind, (not dangerous at all but they will be impacted a little if you maintain the same legal/legal plus tolerance speed), is the consensus that it is reasonable to move to lane 2 - I think it is of course, but in practise there seems increasingly little goodwill from those travelling significantly above the limit in lane 2 who almost always enjoy increasing speed to intimidate, and give you a flash when it would surely be easy for them to move to an unoccupied lane 3...
If you pull into the path of someone else in order to help someone who hasn't got priority anyway, I think that counts as a bit rude (despite being well-intentioned).
It's not really pulling into the path (that's overstating it & not what I meant really) but it is slightly but they have plenty of time to adjust - surely it would be worse to stay in lane 1 with a lot of trafic joining?

In reality, I'd accelerate and increase speed so it wouldn't be an issue but if I were taking my test...?
Well, if you're pulling out in such a way to cause someone to flash you, that's not always going to be down to them being a bit of a tt.

And you wouldn't be taking your test on a motorway. However, if I were to encounter this circumstance on a DC during my test, I think I'd probably just ease off a bit if there was someone joining, and let the joining traffic sort itself out whilst I concentrated on not crashing.

dom180

1,180 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
dom180 said:
CommanderJameson said:
dom180 said:
bluetone said:
Marc W said:
As for already being on the motorway I was always taught to move over if in the left hand lane when people are joining if it's safe to do so.
yes When approching an on-slip on the motorway it is best practice surely to plan on the assumption that there will likely be someone wanting to join ie. make sure you have space to move into lane 2/3 if necessary.
Out of interest, if you're in lane 1 doing an actual 70-75 (GPS verified) and you're approaching a on-slip, if moving to the middle lane slightly inconveniences someone travelling faster in lane 2 a fair way behind, (not dangerous at all but they will be impacted a little if you maintain the same legal/legal plus tolerance speed), is the consensus that it is reasonable to move to lane 2 - I think it is of course, but in practise there seems increasingly little goodwill from those travelling significantly above the limit in lane 2 who almost always enjoy increasing speed to intimidate, and give you a flash when it would surely be easy for them to move to an unoccupied lane 3...
If you pull into the path of someone else in order to help someone who hasn't got priority anyway, I think that counts as a bit rude (despite being well-intentioned).
It's not really pulling into the path (that's overstating it & not what I meant really) but it is slightly but they have plenty of time to adjust - surely it would be worse to stay in lane 1 with a lot of trafic joining?

In reality, I'd accelerate and increase speed so it wouldn't be an issue but if I were taking my test...?
Well, if you're pulling out in such a way to cause someone to flash you, that's not always going to be down to them being a bit of a tt.

And you wouldn't be taking your test on a motorway. However, if I were to encounter this circumstance on a DC during my test, I think I'd probably just ease off a bit if there was someone joining, and let the joining traffic sort itself out whilst I concentrated on not crashing.
Sure. I've seen this a few times where it's happened to other people and it seems to me that it's the faster traffic in lane 2 who is at fault where they have plenty of time/space to move to lane 3 but seem to prefer to stick to lane 2 and not let others pull out.

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

226 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
dom180 said:
Sure. I've seen this a few times where it's happened to other people and it seems to me that it's the faster traffic in lane 2 who is at fault where they have plenty of time/space to move to lane 3 but seem to prefer to stick to lane 2 and not let others pull out.
I don't agree with the notion that the faster cars in L2 are at fault because someone else has executed a manoeuvre that causes them to brake or change course.

dom180

1,180 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
dom180 said:
Sure. I've seen this a few times where it's happened to other people and it seems to me that it's the faster traffic in lane 2 who is at fault where they have plenty of time/space to move to lane 3 but seem to prefer to stick to lane 2 and not let others pull out.
I don't agree with the notion that the faster cars in L2 are at fault because someone else has executed a manoeuvre that causes them to brake or change course.
I'm probably not explaining this well! - I'm not talking about pulling out right in front of someone causing them to have to brake, but if you're doing a true gps 70 then if you have a 200/300 metre gap back to the person behind in lane 2, they'll catch you fairly quickly - for me the problem seems their excess speed and trying to stick to a true 70 in lane 2 which seems to wind everyone up even when there's a good reason for being in lane 2.






Romanymagic

3,298 posts

219 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
My throw on this is that you witness a fight or flight scenario with many members of the public joining a motorway/carriageway from a slip road, typical reactions will be braking, or harsh acceleration or worse still preamble onto the nearside lane with a vane hope that everyone else will now match their humble speed.

In all situations I will a) move into the second/outside lane if safe, b) flash my lights to indicate my position and to encourage the driver who is wanting to enter my carriageway to pull out in front of me c) if things are getting hairy accelerate ahead to clear a gap between me, the vehicle behind and the vehicle trying to join my lane.

Not a lot more can be done I feel.

Mr Will

13,719 posts

206 months

Friday 5th February 2010
quotequote all
waremark said:
One minor point to note is that lane 1 is likely to be moving at 56 mph (heavies are limited to 90 kph) not 70 mph - so that is the speed to try to attain before the merge zone.
I'd disagree slightly with this advice in certain situations, in a low powered car I will normally try to hit 70 as early as possible. As my ability to reduce speed it much greater than my ability to gain it, I feel this maximises my options by giving me a "speed reserve" to allow me to pull in front of other vehicles if necessary, as well as the ability to brake and pull in behind.