Looking at V/S40.

Author
Discussion

enemi

Original Poster:

96 posts

174 months

Sunday 24th October 2010
quotequote all
Hi Guys,

I am currently in the process of looking for a reliable car for a weekly commute of 300miles.
After researching through the forums, I found the Volvo to be an excellent choice.

I am currently 21 with 1 year NCB with Churchill (Although having driven for 3 years already, previously a named driver).

Can you guys please recommend which engine or litre size I should be looking for if I wanted it to be economical yet be rather comfortable and nice to drive for motorway commutes?

I have a budget of 1.5k - 2k.

Cheers!

Google [bot]

6,682 posts

182 months

Sunday 24th October 2010
quotequote all
Get a manual one. A friend of mine recently had an issue with his auto gearbox - a common issue apparently that requires complete rebuild/replacement.

enemi

Original Poster:

96 posts

174 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
Ok, thanks for the advice.

Would you say the 2.0 is the best out of all the available options?
How is it like compared to 1.8 and 1.6?
Does the fuel consumption suffer?

Thanks

hman

7,487 posts

195 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
get a 2.0 T petrol ( not the T4 )

My mrs has this in a v40 and its a pokey enough for some b road hoonage plus comfortable motorway miles. returns 35 to 40 mpg

enemi

Original Poster:

96 posts

174 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
Alright cheers, thanks for the response guys.

Also, would there be a big gap in terms of insurance costs between the 2.0 T and the 1.8?

hman

7,487 posts

195 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
Ring an insurance company, or do some on line quotes

white90

2,003 posts

185 months

Monday 25th October 2010
quotequote all
I have the 1.8 auto 116k and faultless
on a steady run at 60 it did 40mpg
normal driving mid to high 30s
on V40 watch for broken rear springs (v common)
1.9 is a renault engine, these seem to command far more money
I have not heard anything bad about auto versions plus spares are plentiful with loads being broken on Ebay.
avoid 1.8i ones as they are the Mitsubishi engine that should really be run on 100 octane and suffer with needing a de-coke as the mileage gets up around 80k>
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/

for the ££ you will be hard pressed to find better VFM

all my opinions but after 2years of having one it has been ideal.

morgrp

4,128 posts

199 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
hman said:
get a 2.0 T petrol ( not the T4 )

My mrs has this in a v40 and its a pokey enough for some b road hoonage plus comfortable motorway miles. returns 35 to 40 mpg
+1 - Decent performance and easy on the juice.

Failing that either I'd prob go for a 1.8 as an all rounder (Volvo lump, not the Mitsubishi sourced GDI)

enemi

Original Poster:

96 posts

174 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
How do you know if the 1.8 is a Volvo lump or a Mitsubishi one?
Thanks for the advice.

Been viewing a few recently.. Saw a 1.8 one that's really neat and tidy.
But unsure as to whether it's a Volvo lump or not.

y2blade

56,122 posts

216 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
sorry I don't really know much about the S40/V40, I'm sure others here can help
coffee


happy shopping yes

enemi

Original Poster:

96 posts

174 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
I've done some reading about and for those that are wondering the same question;

I think the way to determine between the normal 1.8 Volvo Lump and the 1.8 Mitsubishi Lump is by looking for the badge at the rear of the car.

Mitsu-lumps are badged as 1.8i, and they also have 'GDI" across the rocker cover, whereas the Volvo-lump does not have the "GDI" across the rocker cover.

Hope this helps if anyone else is searching for the same answers!

y2blade

56,122 posts

216 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
enemi said:
I've done some reading about and for those that are wondering the same question;

I think the way to determine between the normal 1.8 Volvo Lump and the 1.8 Mitsubishi Lump is by looking for the badge at the rear of the car.

Mitsu-lumps are badged as 1.8i, and they also have 'GDI" across the rocker cover, whereas the Volvo-lump does not have the "GDI" across the rocker cover.

Hope this helps if anyone else is searching for the same answers!
good info smile

so which is the better one to go for then? the Mitsubishi or the Volvo powerplant?

enemi

Original Poster:

96 posts

174 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
I havent read anything bad about the Volvo-lump, so you may guess that most of the problems that have cropped up and the fact that replacing the GDI injector cost north of 1000pounds, I would steer well clear of the GDI!!

Probably gonna purchase a 1.8 S40 today smile Really excited to become a first time Volvo owner!

issey23

173 posts

190 months

Wednesday 3rd November 2010
quotequote all
enemi said:
Mitsu-lumps are badged as 1.8i, and they also have 'GDI" across the rocker cover, whereas the Volvo-lump does not have the "GDI" across the rocker cover.
Yep thats how to spot a non volvo engine S40.

I had a S40 1.6 xs for nearly 3 years and was faultless, changed the oil every 12 months passed every MOT, sold it

Then brought a focus ST170.. big mistake so sold that 3 months later and brought another S40 a 1.8 xs, but now i fancy a T4....