Hasegawa 1:72 Polikarpov I-16

Hasegawa 1:72 Polikarpov I-16

Author
Discussion

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Sunday 13th November 2016
quotequote all
Found an Aires resin pilot figure at the Telford show yesterday - should give it a bit of life, even though I'm not very good at painting figures:


dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Saturday 31st December 2016
quotequote all
The windscreen in too thick as moulded, so the choice was to a) Buy or make a vac-form version, or b) Thin the original kit item. I opted for b), and used a selection of small files to taper the edge of the screen to a more acceptable size, This was followed by polishing the scratch marks out with Tamiya compounds and a cotton bud. Here is the modded screen with an original for comparison:



Then some careful masking:



And painting with Vallejo Air steel, Humbrol Matt varnish and Tamya weathering powder:





Then, finally, the u/c doors need thinning and modifying slightly.

Vitorio

4,296 posts

143 months

Saturday 31st December 2016
quotequote all
amazing work dr_gn, the amount of detail you manage to work into these little planes is just staggering.

Your work both inspires me to get back into the hobby, and intimidates me knowing that ill never be able to match it.

tight5

2,747 posts

159 months

Saturday 31st December 2016
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
even though I'm not very good at painting figures:
Don't believe a word !
wink

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Monday 2nd January 2017
quotequote all
Comments much appreciated, but I've still not started the pilot...

Onwards to the finish: I decided that since the Eduard photo-etch well covers didn't fit, but were nicely rendered, I'd make a hybrid of thinned-down kit parts (which fit the u/c legs perfectly), and some selected Eduard bits. Also used the riveting wheel to add some...rivets:



Also added the wheel flap cable levers out of scrap plasticard:



Painted & weathered:



I made a simple jig to make sure everything stayed in place while the Araldite set:



Fitted:



And fitting the retraction cables and flap wires:



Final touch was some pva wingtip lights, dotted with clear read and green:



Next is the pilot, and to take some finished pictures when I get chance.

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Friday 6th January 2017
quotequote all
Looking lovely.

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Friday 6th January 2017
quotequote all
Congratulations, looks fantastic.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
Thanks Guys, here are some finished pictures:

Hasegawa 1:72 Polikarpov I-16 Type 18, 72nd Air Regiment, Northern Fleet Air Force, Murmansk 1941
















Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
Why did this aircraft have only a two bladed propeller?

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Why did this aircraft have only a two bladed propeller?
Same as most aircraft designed back in the early 1930's. I guess it's a function of engine power, flight envelope and complexity. Increasing engine power usually resulted in more blades, or at least more extreme geometry. The Spitfire/Seafire series of aircraft went from 2 to 6 blades throughout it's development, while engine power more than doubled (I think). I can't think of any other aircraft that had 2,3,4,5 & 6 bladed variants throughout its life.

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Why did this aircraft have only a two bladed propeller?
It wasn't unusual at that time -










tight5

2,747 posts

159 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
here are some finished pictures:
Where's the pilot ?

wink

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
tight5 said:
dr_gn said:
here are some finished pictures:
Where's the pilot ?

wink
dr_gn said:
even though I'm not very good at painting figures:
biggrin I got some Vallejo paints delivered today, so I'll have a go and see how it turns out.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Sunday 8th January 2017
quotequote all
Here's the pilot finished. Figure painting is obviously far more of an art than painting an aircraft (especially faces!), but at least he gives some scale and adds a bit of interest. I'll put him in the critique section of Brexitmodeller and see if I can get any tips for next time.






dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
Won best in class, and best in show at IPMS Huddersfield today:



Very pleased with that after having to start agian with it.

tight5

2,747 posts

159 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
Well done.

clap

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
Congrats.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Same as most aircraft designed back in the early 1930's. I guess it's a function of engine power, flight envelope and complexity. Increasing engine power usually resulted in more blades, or at least more extreme geometry. The Spitfire/Seafire series of aircraft went from 2 to 6 blades throughout it's development, while engine power more than doubled (I think). I can't think of any other aircraft that had 2,3,4,5 & 6 bladed variants throughout its life.
IIRC it's because airscrews stop working when they go supersonic (stopping very big blades), and very fat blades cause a lot of drag. The best way of using the extra power was to add blades.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,161 posts

184 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
On the later carrier based aircraft, propeller diameter was s problem due to deck strikes (Seafire etc). Contra-rotating props allowed reduced diameter at the expense of complexity/weight/efficiency.