Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

macp

Original Poster:

2,421 posts

52 months

[news] 
Thursday 2nd August 2012 quote quote all
I had a brand new 1994 306 HDi and although not the fastest thing I thought it was a decent car.Just wondering what the 1.6 & 1.8 petrol cars are like ?

StoatInACoat

621 posts

54 months

[news] 
Friday 3rd August 2012 quote quote all
1.6 is one to avoid. Not particularly frugal, higher tax bracket, weak gearbox, not especially fast or refined old 8v TU engine.

The 1.8 is a different car. Post 1998 will be the 16v - avoid the 8v like the plague, it's a rubbish engine. The difference is easy to spot looking under the bonnet as the 16v inlet manifold looks like a bunch of black plastic bananas.

I had one for five years. Mine was a late phase 3 so gti-6 style bumpers and skirts, leather, air con etc. I covered nearly 70k in it and at one point was doing 25k a year and in that time it was comfortable, reliable, quick enough and just generally faultless. The only criticism is that they are fairly juicy compared to a more modern engine and mine was typically running low 30's on a combined cycle. They will go on to big miles if looked after properly.

Lovely car and I almost regret selling it for the rattle can I have now. Weak points are sagging rear beams, wishbones (cheap), interior fans not working (very cheap - scrappy part will fix) and broken air con. the 1.8 needs a cambelt at 70k and it's expensive so make sure it's had one. My one had an oil change every 10kish - much more and it started to sound a bit crappy.

eliotrw

174 posts

38 months

[news] 
Friday 3rd August 2012 quote quote all
This sounds ridiculous but bear with me.Providing you arent 18 I would just get the GTI-6

The reaseons for this are:
I'd wager you could actually get a nicer one for the money than any other model, The values are at an all time low and there are some serious bargains kicking about on the owners club at the moment.

They are just as reliable than the smaller engined ones.
And mine does about 27mpg on the combined cycle, which isnt much worse than a 1.8 going of what stoatinacoat says.

Worth thinking about.

eliotrw

174 posts

38 months

[news] 
Friday 3rd August 2012 quote quote all
Just realised you had a hdi when new.

Get a GTi-6

Kitchski

2,172 posts

100 months

[news] 
Friday 3rd August 2012 quote quote all
Wouldn't have been a HDi in 1994.....
Advertisement

Old Merc

885 posts

36 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
The 306 16V was one of the best models Peugeot produced.In fact the whole 306 range where great cars,bullet proof diesels,steady economical Tu`s,nothing wrong with the XU 8V,and the XU 16V has got to be Peugeot`s best engine.

eliotrw

174 posts

38 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
Good point, I dont even think the 1.9td was out on the launch in 1994?
only diesel was the 1.9n/a i think

rb5er

4,560 posts

41 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
macp said:
I had a brand new 1994 306 HDi
No you didn't.

macp

Original Poster:

2,421 posts

52 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
eliotrw said:
Good point, I dont even think the 1.9td was out on the launch in 1994?
only diesel was the 1.9n/a i think
Thats it mine was a 1.9n/a fine on the motorway but a bit sluggish otherwise.

macp

Original Poster:

2,421 posts

52 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
rb5er said:
macp said:
I had a brand new 1994 306 HDi
No you didn't.
No I didnt.

Old Merc

885 posts

36 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
Our "workshop truck" is a 94 306 1.9 Diesel,we have been abusing and thrashing this great little car for over ten years.Its done 170K and just keeps on going and refuses to die,and never let us down.
Reply to Topic