Clio 200 questions

Author
Discussion

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Friday 19th April 2013
quotequote all
deadmau5 said:
Technomatt said:
deadmau5 said:
It is well known that the synchros on first, second and third are modified with a single piece, solid baulk ring instead of the original three piece.

It is also quite common for those with repaired/replaced boxes to have quite stiff changes once the box is quite warm. I suppose stiff is seen as better than crunching though!

Edited by deadmau5 on Friday 19th April 07:59
Well in that case, you are the only bloke that knows about this modification.

I doubt it's true.
Good grief. Have you looked at anything on clio197.net apart from that graph?
As usual lots of rumours that people want to believe...... but nothing ever official or proven.

Even late spec Clio 200's have failed gearboxes.

Many Clios have had more than one failed gearbox.

Where are all these modified and strengthened gearboxes then? biggrin

simoid

19,772 posts

159 months

Friday 19th April 2013
quotequote all
I fear most of your posts are now failing the "so what?" tests, Matt.

deadmau5

3,197 posts

181 months

Friday 19th April 2013
quotequote all
Officially there's nothing wrong with the gearboxes. Admitting they are putting stronger rings in is essentially saying the original rings aren't up to the job and admitting the problem.

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Friday 19th April 2013
quotequote all
deadmau5 said:
Officially there's nothing wrong with the gearboxes. Admitting they are putting stronger rings in is essentially saying the original rings aren't up to the job and admitting the problem.
You are not addressing the real issue. This has been going on for years and still is.

If Renault has solved the problem, why are late build car's gearboxes still failing (some with very low mileage) and some owners have had more than one replacement gearbox.

You would be better off saying 'officially' Renault has never solved the problem.

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Friday 19th April 2013
quotequote all
simoid said:
I fear most of your posts are now failing the "so what?" tests, Matt.
Not failing as much as the 'there isn't really a problem' type posts.

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

158 months

Friday 19th April 2013
quotequote all
Odd how my new one is better than the old one...


I do wonder where the hate comes from Technomatt, ex renault employee? buggered by a twizzy? who knows.... you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet though.

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Friday 19th April 2013
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
Odd how my new one is better than the old one...


I do wonder where the hate comes from Technomatt, ex renault employee? buggered by a twizzy? who knows.... you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet though.
Also odd that no one can substantiate any modifications.....

I also wonder where all the unsubstantiated bias and replies keep coming from. Owners, ex owners? buggered by the truth? Who knows... but I now have a good feel from where it’s coming from.

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

158 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
Technomatt said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Odd how my new one is better than the old one...


I do wonder where the hate comes from Technomatt, ex renault employee? buggered by a twizzy? who knows.... you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet though.
Also odd that no one can substantiate any modifications.....

I also wonder where all the unsubstantiated bias and replies keep coming from. Owners, ex owners? buggered by the truth? Who knows... but I now have a good feel from where it’s coming from.
I'll spell it out for you, people who've had them replaced generally under or near to warranty are unlikely to get a box replaced and then proceed to drop the sub frame on their car and remove said box from their car only to prove you wrong.

People don't care what you think that much.....

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
Technomatt said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Odd how my new one is better than the old one...


I do wonder where the hate comes from Technomatt, ex renault employee? buggered by a twizzy? who knows.... you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet though.
Also odd that no one can substantiate any modifications.....

I also wonder where all the unsubstantiated bias and replies keep coming from. Owners, ex owners? buggered by the truth? Who knows... but I now have a good feel from where it’s coming from.
I'll spell it out for you, people who've had them replaced generally under or near to warranty are unlikely to get a box replaced and then proceed to drop the sub frame on their car and remove said box from their car only to prove you wrong.

People don't care what you think that much.....
Maybe the chap that is about to get his 3rd gearbox, with the 2nd one only fitted in 2012 would be interested in the unfounded speculation regarding Renault’s modified gearbox...... biggrin

I will also be clear for you and just stick to the facts, unless you can prove otherwise:

This is a huge problem for Renault and Clio owners. About 1 in 4 owners on one of the well respected forums have had replacement gearboxes. Late build Clio 200s also have gearboxes that fail. Anyone buying second hand or out of warranty needs to be aware of a potential huge bill. Even those in warranty can end up paying a big contribution. Some sell as their warranty expires due to gearbox worries. Renault have never declared a gearbox modification.

Some people obviously think that is an insignificant issue or wish to downplay it because they own a Clio RS. That’s up to them, but unfortunately it doesn’t change the reality.

I’ll start to care about what you say when you have something more in tune with reality.



Mr Jenks

1,204 posts

266 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
Technomatt said:
Even those in warranty can end up paying a big contribution.
How come ?

Butter Face

30,341 posts

161 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
Odd how my new one is better than the old one...


I do wonder where the hate comes from Technomatt, ex renault employee? buggered by a twizzy? who knows.... you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet though.
His budgie was run over by a Modus.


Or it was an otter and an Espace. I forget.

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

158 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
Mr Jenks said:
Technomatt said:
Even those in warranty can end up paying a big contribution.
How come ?
He seems to have taken to making things up too.....

Possibly why he got banned from the last forum he shared his opinions on.

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
Mr Jenks said:
How come ?
Because as Renault is gently buttering your arse in preparation, they will say you buggered the box and it’s a new one going in with some fresh ancillaries. Cough yum

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
Mr Jenks said:
Technomatt said:
Even those in warranty can end up paying a big contribution.
How come ?
He seems to have taken to making things up too.....

Possibly why he got banned from the last forum he shared his opinions on.
Not me, just the facts and wouldn't it be nice to hear something more positive than just your random theories on these gearbox 'modifications'.

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

158 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
Technomatt said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Mr Jenks said:
Technomatt said:
Even those in warranty can end up paying a big contribution.
How come ?
He seems to have taken to making things up too.....

Possibly why he got banned from the last forum he shared his opinions on.
Not me, just the facts and wouldn't it be nice to hear something more positive than just your random theories on these gearbox 'modifications'.
I'm actually reeling from YOU accusing me of lacking positivity biglaugh

Funny guy!

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Saturday 20th April 2013
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
Technomatt said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Mr Jenks said:
Technomatt said:
Even those in warranty can end up paying a big contribution.
How come ?
He seems to have taken to making things up too.....

Possibly why he got banned from the last forum he shared his opinions on.
Not me, just the facts and wouldn't it be nice to hear something more positive than just your random theories on these gearbox 'modifications'.
I'm actually reeling from YOU accusing me of lacking positivity biglaugh

Funny guy!
I'll rephrase it for you ... it would be nice to have some more evidence from you than just your random theories on these gearbox 'modifications'.

Mr Jenks

1,204 posts

266 months

Sunday 21st April 2013
quotequote all
Technomatt said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Technomatt said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Mr Jenks said:
Technomatt said:
Even those in warranty can end up paying a big contribution.
How come ?
He seems to have taken to making things up too.....

Possibly why he got banned from the last forum he shared his opinions on.
Not me, just the facts and wouldn't it be nice to hear something more positive than just your random theories on these gearbox 'modifications'.
I'm actually reeling from YOU accusing me of lacking positivity biglaugh

Funny guy!
I'll rephrase it for you ... it would be nice to have some more evidence from you than just your random theories on these gearbox 'modifications'.
Modifications to the gearbox or not, your claim that owners are being charged towards the replacement of the gearbox, whilst under warranty, need some substanciation, other than just your theories and pub stories

Technomatt

1,085 posts

134 months

Sunday 21st April 2013
quotequote all
Mr Jenks said:
Modifications to the gearbox or not, your claim that owners are being charged towards the replacement of the gearbox, whilst under warranty, need some substanciation, other than just your theories and pub stories
It's quite obvious from my post. Even if your car is in warranty with Renault, a box change can incur charges for non-warranty covered ancillaries such as a new clutch etc

By the way, as your posts suggest you are a Renault employee with your real customers here:

Mr Jenks said:
Nobody denies a problem, the size of the problem and the way the figures have been acquired are the question.
An internet forum poll never has been, and never will be refresentative of anything other than those on the forum.
My knowledge doesn`t come from a few mates down the pub, but real cars, real customers.
Could we have some of that superior ‘knowledge’ on Renault's official Clio 197/200 gearbox failure rates or details on these alleged gearbox modifications that have solved this huge failure rate?

Geneve

3,867 posts

220 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
I have a 2010 RS200 in which I've done 27k mls. Lovely gearbox, no issues, (extended warranty). EVO recently highlighted it as one of the Top 10 manual gearboxes.

I'm assuming failures are actually fairly rare, but out of interest, how does it manifest itself.

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

158 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Geneve said:
I have a 2010 RS200 in which I've done 27k mls. Lovely gearbox, no issues, (extended warranty). EVO recently highlighted it as one of the Top 10 manual gearboxes.

I'm assuming failures are actually fairly rare, but out of interest, how does it manifest itself.
Being nigh on impossible to get into a gear when cold and crunching between 3rd and 4th.