First Car? Pug 106?...

First Car? Pug 106?...

Author
Discussion

tablechair

Original Poster:

12,230 posts

195 months

Monday 7th April 2008
quotequote all
Hello all,

Im looking to buy my first (cheap!) car, i was thinking of a 106, something like a 1.1L. what do you guys think? i can get one with 50-60K on the clock, about 8-10 yrs old for under a grand.
Or... does anyone have any other ideas?

Cheers

Mikey G

4,733 posts

241 months

Monday 7th April 2008
quotequote all
You should easily find a 106 for less than £1k, lots about to choose from at various prices and mileages.

PD_400

101 posts

208 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
We've just traded in the wifes 106, her first car. Cost us £350 for an N reg 1.1 in silver with 90k and its been a great car, cheap to run, cheap for parts and cheap for insurance.

number2301

508 posts

201 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
What about a 1.4 XT? Nothing sporty so should still be alright on insurance but it will have PAS and painted bumpers etc.

EDLT

15,421 posts

207 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
They aren't bad cars, but the 306 isn't much more to insure. A 306 D-turbo is group 5, and although it will be older/higher mileage it is better built and better equipped.

406turbo

16 posts

226 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
EDLT said:
They aren't bad cars, but the 306 isn't much more to insure. A 306 D-turbo is group 5, and although it will be older/higher mileage it is better built and better equipped.
I concur. Also if you have over size 8 feet you will struggle to drive the 106 as the pedals are very close together.

Mieran

48 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
I had a 1.1 106 as my first car, it was great. Back in 2006 I bought it for £1000, it was X-Reg with 64k on the clock.

The two bad things about it were it only had 3 studs and the brakes were very weak.


tablechair

Original Poster:

12,230 posts

195 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
3 studs?...

Mikey G

4,733 posts

241 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
tablechair said:
3 studs?...
A lot of the small Peugeots and Citroens only have 3 wheel nuts holding them on. Nothing to worry about.

Also the brakes, its not a gti so it wont have great stopping power, but when looked after its enough to stop you in an emergency.

tablechair

Original Poster:

12,230 posts

195 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
ahh not i get you, i will also look at 306's as suggested, im not really bothered whatcar it is as long as its pretty reliable, cheap to run and insure.

Anyone got any other ideas?

number2301

508 posts

201 months

Friday 11th April 2008
quotequote all
406turbo said:
EDLT said:
They aren't bad cars, but the 306 isn't much more to insure. A 306 D-turbo is group 5, and although it will be older/higher mileage it is better built and better equipped.
I concur. Also if you have over size 8 feet you will struggle to drive the 106 as the pedals are very close together.
You can get used to it, you just have to drive with your toes.

dhutch

14,390 posts

198 months

Wednesday 16th April 2008
quotequote all
Im a fan of 306's
- IM on my second,and we've just bought one for my sister to learn in.

The first was a 1.6 wreg merdian which my dad had from 6months old ex-hire.
- I bought it off him with 140k of gentle moterway miles, and did another 7.5 driving it like i stole it. Before im managed to wright it of on a muddy country road at chrismas (anyone else see that coming?).
- Being one of the later cars, and a merdian, it had all the spec. Half leather, fully colour co-ordinated trim, ac and cc, auto screens. The works. And with 140k on the clock it drove like new, at had a book price of around £8-900. Good private i would have been looking at £1100 tops maybe. No issues with the car all, clutch was done at about £130k but nothing else at all really.

Ive now got a 1.8 vreg thats otherwise identical. I paid £1800 for it with 31.5k on the clock. Drives very well, but its not chalk and cheese from the 1.6 tbh even tho its a diffrent base engine (16v xu not 8v tu)

My sister has a wreg Hdi merdian which is also good to drive and was £2200 with 80K

Older ones are well under £1000

Daniel

Shrimper

423 posts

195 months

Wednesday 16th April 2008
quotequote all
406turbo said:
EDLT said:
They aren't bad cars, but the 306 isn't much more to insure. A 306 D-turbo is group 5, and although it will be older/higher mileage it is better built and better equipped.
I concur. Also if you have over size 8 feet you will struggle to drive the 106 as the pedals are very close together.
True about your feet size, the pedals are awful small and theres not much space down in the footwell.

Ive got a Quicksilver at the moment, its easy to look after and theres loads of spare parts knocking around. 106's are nice and basic, if you look after them they will look after you.

But if you want something for carting your mates around, theres not much space...

RT106

715 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th April 2008
quotequote all
I've got size 13s and have never had any problem driving my 106. Never understood why everyone always goes on about the pedals.

number2301

508 posts

201 months

Thursday 17th April 2008
quotequote all
Have a go in a 205, the difference is immense. As I said in my girlfriends 106 I have to drive with my toes, in my 205 I put my foot right on the pedal without catching 2 at once.

Shrimper

423 posts

195 months

Thursday 17th April 2008
quotequote all
RT106 said:
I've got size 13s and have never had any problem driving my 106. Never understood why everyone always goes on about the pedals.
I think its just one of the first things I noticed when I bought my car, compared to my clio. Its not difficult to adapt tho.

So have you made a choice yet tablechair??

RT106

715 posts

200 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
number2301 said:
Have a go in a 205, the difference is immense. As I said in my girlfriends 106 I have to drive with my toes, in my 205 I put my foot right on the pedal without catching 2 at once.
I've got a 205 too. I much prefer the 205 in almost every respect, but I don't think the pedal box in the 106 is anywhere near as bad as people make out.

tablechair

Original Poster:

12,230 posts

195 months

Sunday 27th April 2008
quotequote all
hmmm not too sure...

tied between a 106 and a 8yr oldish polo, seem to both be sub 1k and good cars