Phantom Ownership One Month On

Phantom Ownership One Month On

Author
Discussion

dazzalse

Original Poster:

564 posts

179 months

Thursday 9th June 2016
quotequote all
allister said:
dazzalse said:
You would have known by the Mulsanne thread that my new Bentley has arrived! The Phantom has gone but will be shortly replaced by a new RR Dawn, there was a huge warranty bill on the Phantom just before Xmas and the deal with the Mulsanne was too tempting, our worry was keeping the Phantom longterm because of the warranty issues that its had, although its been great since xmas without fault. But I will take a new Phantom as soon as they get launched, and keep the Bentley more as everyday it was such astonishing value.
Sounds like a wise move, I know you've had your ups and downs with the Phantom.... So how are you finding that beautiful new car, that I so very nearly bought??

Any notes to compare??? Mine has been back to the garage a couple of times so far, with only very minor faults (teething problems), I do find it sometimes a little jerky / clunky on gear changes at very low speeds in slow moving traffic, have you experienced this??

Other than that, I'm loving it......

Its not has much use, small problem with the keyless entry and the car recognising the key, but they sent the technician from Harwoods the following morning (300 miles round trip) who rectified it all on the drive within the hour, the jerkiness comes with the 8 speed box and also affected the Phantom, something we never had with the series 1 Phantom or our Final series Arnage, my personal view is that these cars with huge engines and massive reserves of torque do not need the 8 speed gearbox, less cogs would make for a smoother ride in slow traffic.
Mine has the Naim system which I now remember from when we had a last Arnage, hugely powerful but a rather detached and disconnected sound it's a very bright system that lack depth and warmth.


Edited by allister on Thursday 9th June 00:16

SRT Hellcat

7,032 posts

217 months

Thursday 9th June 2016
quotequote all
WelshBentleyBoy said:
Byteme seems to have knack of killing threads!!
Maybe but I am always fascinated by what he has to say and value his input

allister

564 posts

147 months

Thursday 9th June 2016
quotequote all
SRT Hellcat said:
WelshBentleyBoy said:
Byteme seems to have knack of killing threads!!
Maybe but I am always fascinated by what he has to say and value his input
Although WelshBentleyBoy and I may not always agree with Byteme's comments, everyone has the right to their own opinion here, a point which I'm sure both WBB and I accept.

After all, it would be a very dull forum if everyone had the same views.... Furthermore, I'm sure I'm right in saying that neither myself, nor WelshBentleyBoy would want to discourage Byteme from contributing.

Edited by allister on Thursday 9th June 22:37

allister

564 posts

147 months

Thursday 9th June 2016
quotequote all
dazzalse said:
allister said:
dazzalse said:
You would have known by the Mulsanne thread that my new Bentley has arrived! The Phantom has gone but will be shortly replaced by a new RR Dawn, there was a huge warranty bill on the Phantom just before Xmas and the deal with the Mulsanne was too tempting, our worry was keeping the Phantom longterm because of the warranty issues that its had, although its been great since xmas without fault. But I will take a new Phantom as soon as they get launched, and keep the Bentley more as everyday it was such astonishing value.
Sounds like a wise move, I know you've had your ups and downs with the Phantom.... So how are you finding that beautiful new car, that I so very nearly bought??

Any notes to compare??? Mine has been back to the garage a couple of times so far, with only very minor faults (teething problems), I do find it sometimes a little jerky / clunky on gear changes at very low speeds in slow moving traffic, have you experienced this??

Other than that, I'm loving it......

Its not has much use, small problem with the keyless entry and the car recognising the key, but they sent the technician from Harwoods the following morning (300 miles round trip) who rectified it all on the drive within the hour, the jerkiness comes with the 8 speed box and also affected the Phantom, something we never had with the series 1 Phantom or our Final series Arnage, my personal view is that these cars with huge engines and massive reserves of torque do not need the 8 speed gearbox, less cogs would make for a smoother ride in slow traffic.
Mine has the Naim system which I now remember from when we had a last Arnage, hugely powerful but a rather detached and disconnected sound it's a very bright system that lack depth and warmth.


Edited by allister on Thursday 9th June 00:16
Thanks for the info dazzalse - I also had a small technical problem, for which Bentley Manchester sent over one of their own technicians on a Saturday morning (not as far as you, but still a 3-4 hour round trip) - So I have to say, so far, I cannot fault Bentley on their customer service.

Really pleased to read your comments on the gearbox, I thought there was something wrong with mine...... It's not really bad but it is more noticeable than the gear changes on my 10 year old 4.4 petrol Range Rover (worth about £10k), I guess I'll get used to it though.

Please keep me updated on your ownership experience, likewise I will you also.... Maybe detail this in a new thread, perhaps titled: "2016 Bentley Mulsanne Ownership"

Edited by allister on Thursday 9th June 23:01

Rick101

6,970 posts

150 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Great thread. Been an insight.

I'm always a little perplexed when I read, car's been terrible, constantly breaking and unreliable....so we've bought another one.
Hope the next one is considerably better.

WelshBentleyBoy

339 posts

199 months

Saturday 11th June 2016
quotequote all
Byteme said:
This may have gone over your head but this, once again, is twenty year old technology. Prior to "tablets" engineers had access to pens and paper. If your point is that the people who work in this field are stupid and could benefit from your fantasies you're mistaken. You may well believe that technology didn't exist before you were born but more than fifty years ago engineers were designing systems to put men on the moon. When your expertise compares to them you may have something to contribute. You may have a degree in media studies but I was working on vehicles in the 90s that had workshop manuals that extended to 6000 pages. YES six thousand!

One contributor may have more knowledge and experience than others but there are ways of expressing this which are less offensive than the above statement. The author of this opinion has been equally opinionated on other sites and incurred the wrath of their administrators with the ultimate sanction. Please let us have a responsible exchange of fact and opinion with an acceptable level of courtesy and respect to all contributors


Edited by Byteme on Sunday 24th April 04:03

allister

564 posts

147 months

Monday 13th June 2016
quotequote all
WelshBentleyBoy said:
Byteme said:
This may have gone over your head but this, once again, is twenty year old technology. Prior to "tablets" engineers had access to pens and paper. If your point is that the people who work in this field are stupid and could benefit from your fantasies you're mistaken. You may well believe that technology didn't exist before you were born but more than fifty years ago engineers were designing systems to put men on the moon. When your expertise compares to them you may have something to contribute. You may have a degree in media studies but I was working on vehicles in the 90s that had workshop manuals that extended to 6000 pages. YES six thousand!

One contributor may have more knowledge and experience than others but there are ways of expressing this which are less offensive than the above statement. The author of this opinion has been equally opinionated on other sites and incurred the wrath of their administrators with the ultimate sanction. Please let us have a responsible exchange of fact and opinion with an acceptable level of courtesy and respect to all contributors


Edited by Byteme on Sunday 24th April 04:03
Although I have also been on the receiving end of Byteme's rudeness, I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt in my comment above.... I obviously didn't realise it was quite so widespread, so I have to agree with you WelshBentleyBoy

matt5791

381 posts

126 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
It's shame, because I think Byteme does have some very interesting insight to give, particularly on the SZ era cars (1980 - 2002, spirit, spur, Turbo R, Continental R) but he just cant help but give it in the wrong way. He got banned from www.rollsroyceforums.com


Sparkyhd

1,792 posts

95 months

Saturday 18th June 2016
quotequote all
Seems to me owning this type of car is like having a pet dog. Once the emotional bond is made it doesn't matter how often you visit the vet you're morally obligated to pay the expensive bills.

I don't know how dazzalse made his money to afford this car but I'm sure if one of his business assets was this unreliable it would be swapped out.

We're about to be inundated with programmes about Tim Peake but I'd prefer a fly on the wall documentary following this Roller to Portugal because it's more exciting edge of the seat stuff.

MRPULLHARD

318 posts

131 months

Friday 8th July 2016
quotequote all
bit strange that there will be no Phantoms available in 2017 and its replacement not due until 2018 ? cant recall this happening before with a car. ?
Also were the coupes and Dhc really selling so badly that they are not making replacement for them ?

What issues do people think should be addressed in Phantom replacement ? , a less marmite front end for one !

stain

1,051 posts

210 months

Friday 8th July 2016
quotequote all
More headroom in the back and more boot space.

matt5791

381 posts

126 months

Saturday 9th July 2016
quotequote all
MRPULLHARD said:
What issues do people think should be addressed in Phantom replacement ?
Replacement of RR badge with BMW one.