Murray's Clearly Not Turning Into Henman mark II

[im]

Yeah I'd pay Justices bet - even though he didn't pay mine - page 32 refers.

Justices: Your charity please.

Frankly, if a bunch of Murray fans think that they can get me pay out on a bet I won then you've been at the happy juice

Oh that £100 paid on my behalf, receipt please. I'll supply one for Justices bet.

Edited by im on Tuesday 11th September 12:04

[im]

Greenie said:

"Your order fromMalaria No More UK has been successful.
The unique reference for this transaction is :malarianomoreuk297555958
Tue 11/09/2012 11:46
DearAdrian P
Thank you for your order. Your payment has been processed successfully.
Thank you so very much for your donation.

Please quote your order numbermalarianomoreuk297555958 in all correspondence with eitherMalaria No More UK or Sage Pay.

Order total:100.00 GBP
Card used:National Westminster Bank Plc, United Kingdom - MasterCard - XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX - Attempt:2

You bought:Donation to malarianomoreuk"

Sorry you didn't believe me. Prick status reconfirmed.

Well done.

But you're a sore loser.

[im]

Justices said:

I'll take another charity donation bet on him taking the #1 ranking next year along with his 2nd Slam if anyone's up for it.

Be specific and I'm in.

Do you mean on this date next year (11/09/13) he'll be world ranked No.1?

Or that he'll have been No.1 at some point before 11/09/13 even though he may have lost that ranking by 11/09/13?

I'll take a bet on the former.

Edited by im on Tuesday 11th September 12:12

[im]

LocoCoco said:

Just bow out of this thread now. You've lost all integrity.

[im]

LocoCoco said:

im said:

LocoCoco said:

Just bow out of this thread now. You've lost all integrity.

What?? You made a friendly wager on a forum and now you're acting like William Hill refusing to pay out on a technicality.

What technicality is that then?

Oh - 5th post down on this page - in bold.

[im]

Alex said:

To be fair to im, the original bet (from the first page of this thread) was within 2 years.

And even if it was 3 years, the bet appeared to have been agreed on 9th September 2009 and Murray just won his first Grand Slam on 10th September 2012, 3 years and 1 day later.

Thank you.

[im]

garyhun said:

Alex said:

To be fair to im, the original bet (from the first page of this thread) was within 2 years.

And even if it was 3 years, the bet appeared to have been agreed on 9th September 2009 and Murray just won his first Grand Slam on 10th September 2012, 3 years and 1 day later.

It's all about integrity.

It is and you have none. Calling on somebody who's won a bet to pay out for that bet is mind-blowing.

Justices bet I'll honour.

[im]

Justices said:

Regarding the other bet you had on, I'll agree with you because technically you didn't agree to 3 years.

Thank you.

Justices said:

But you should pay up anyway, just because you started the thread. Not logical no, but this is PH and the might of the posters will forever be against you

Yeah - that'll make me shell out £100.

[im]

Leithen said:

Page two of the thread can only be read as either the bet being "agreed" at three years on the 11th Sept, or equally no bet being agreed at all.

Greenie is smelling of roses here, im of something else.

For the hard of thinking (ie you):

im said:

greenie said:

...Mind you I'll take £100 for you not winning one anytime soon

OK...can I include Smash Court Tennis on the PS3 where I'm a world beater...?

My goodness.

[im]

Justices said:

1. I say he'll finish the year (2013) ranked #1. Toughest to do as that takes the whole year of points into account.

OK - If, on the 31st December 2013 Murray is ranked No.1 in the world in the ATP rankings then I'll pay your charity of choice £30

If not, you'll pay mine an equal amount, agreed?

Not really interested in the 2nd bet as with Nadal out till god-knows-when it only takes another withdrawl and Murray becomes favourite.

And ffs, let me have your charity for this bet just gone fella so I can settle it up.

[im]

Leithen said:

Do you work in politics or the media? Either way, the use of selective quotes is unedifying to say the least.

Greenie's full quote reads;

Greenie said:

I'd feel better at 3 years!! Mind you I'll take £100 for you not winning one anytime soon

.

Go on, man up and pay up.

Yeah - HE'D feel better - I Didn't agree with that so didn't answer it as I already had by saying "Not 3 years".

My "OK...blah blah" response was to his comical remark about "taking a £100 bet about ME winning it".

Your failure to grasp a simply conversation is very frustrating.

[im]

Leithen said:

So, to be clear, your "OK" did not agree to the three years modification. Fine, ipso facto, there is no bet as you offered it at two years and Greenie offered to take it up at three, which you did not agree to.

Correct. Phew, its been a long road but we've got there.

The rest of your post is nonsense.

Of course if you and everyone else on here who also didn't lose a bet would like to donate to charity then I'm in. Yes?

[im]

Leithen said:

If you haven't got the readies to reciprocate, just admit it.

That'd be all this weeks dole money gone

[im]

Jasey@ said:

im said:

So it comes down to one final game.

3 years ago I started this thread and predicted that Murray wouldn't win a GS event for at least 3 years or in the next 12 GS tournaments.

Some disagreed and a couple had a bet with me.

Well tomorrow that bet expires and I have to say that frankly even if he does win tomorrow I feel that it was worth the bet. For 11 GS's I've had bragging rights at the end of each one...well worth £20 of anyones cash.

Good luck Justices.

C'mon Jokervitch, kick some sorry scottish butt one last time.

Think you should probably stump up too im - you were still giving it large on Sunday .

Technically you may have won the bet - but even you thought it was still on before Murray's win (this post was the first time you mentioned 'next 12 Grand slams' - I assume it was after the us open in 2009 when this all started).

Keep up Jasey. I've asked 3 times for the Charity name.

[im]

hidetheelephants said:

The one in the middle is Tamira Paszek; she went out to Azarenka in the quarter finals.

Could you have a more apt user name

[im]

ViperPict said:

esprit6 said:

Viper Pict has no interest other than arguing with everyone about anything,

1 post in 13 months?

fk off.

I spot-on post in 13 months though

[im]

"Senior Poster" eh? Hmmm...that gets you untouchable status eh?

Right...I'm expecting an apology from every fker who's posted on this thread then

[im]

esprit6 said:

Well i actually agree with VP! and not a he but a she, did not realise there was a hierarchy when it came to posting??? that's men for ya!

Well done lady!

...and there isn't a hierarchy as far as posting is concerned.

[im]

ViperPict said:

esprit6 said:

Well i actually agree with VP! and not a he but a she, did not realise there was a hierarchy when it came to posting??? that's men for ya!

You're from Aberdeen and female.... Have we had 'relations'?

Everyone from Aberdeen has probably had their relations

[im]

esprit6 said:

def don't know you . Question all ; are white cars a no no ?

Depends on the car but you should really ask that question in the General Gassing Forum where you'll get a lot of opinions.