Strava

Author
Discussion

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Thursday 6th June 2013
quotequote all
Traffic suck, no corners to negotiate mostly, and any downhill obviously you can go at full pace as no need to worry about stopping really. Yes, many of them have 'grippy' surfaces, however.

The one i set my PB on (19.13) is an odd one, first two miles are total ste, potholes left right and center, after the first turn its smooth, then you go down an absoloute ski slope (48 mph down there in tt bars) and then there is another turn to make up for the ski slope. TT'ing is an odd world, where people will do anything and race on any course if it means a PB. That particular course however (f11/10) is quite safe, but some of them are on fairly busy roads.

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Saturday 22nd June 2013
quotequote all
Flag it. Job done.

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Saturday 22nd June 2013
quotequote all
No you can flag just his ride.

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
Mr Will said:
The worst for competitiveness was when I had exactly the same commute as one of my best mates. There was a pancake flat half mile segment that became a daily battle-ground with the KoM changing hands on a regular basis. Any day with a tailwind was a free for all and he still holds the record with an AVERAGE of 32.9mph.

Which reminds me, I really must head back to that part of town soon scratchchin
All about tailwinds!

Those speeds sounded mental, then you get on a TT bike, and fid you can avg over 31mph for 10 miles!

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Tuesday 25th June 2013
quotequote all
When you think of all the spare time you probably have in a week as someone without a kid then 12 hours to do 200-250 miles or whatever isn't too bad.

BUT as Fungle said, its a question of commitment, its my hobby and its a main method of transport to work, so naturally it doesn't seem like such a huge time investment for something I like to do. If I was a tri-athlete or something and had to train for 3 things thee is no way I'd be able to commit 12 hours to just the bike, which explains why they're all so slow wink

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Tuesday 25th June 2013
quotequote all
Yes, I left one of my mates partners birthday drinks at 10.30 on Saturday as I had to be up at 7 for a race, its now at the point where they understand why I don't come out every thur/fri/sat wink

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
He probably did it very early morning/late at night and jumped a lot of lights.

Averaging those speeds is pretty easy if you go in very late early and don't give a st about lights.

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
SuperNiceBig said:
Is there a way in Strava to find who created a segment? Had a quick look but no luck.
Thanks. G
Sadly, I don't think so, a shame because there are times I'd like to ask people what was going through their mind when they created the 150th segment of Richmond Park.

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
Dizeee said:
My comment was tongue in cheek, I don't actually make any riding decisions based on what strava will say, just there are too many segments. As for cheating comments that was okgo not me. Whatever you think you know about my relationship with strava, your wrong.
I do agree, its silly in some places, sadly where you and I live (more me than you) its totally OTT.

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Monday 1st July 2013
quotequote all
So I go and do an easy ride with the idea of doing 2-3 vo2 intervals up the climbs and I'm defeating the object of strava? LOL!

If someone wants to go out with the sole intention of battering a segment I do not see the issue. If you're so convinced you're better there is nothin stopping you going and doing the same thing.

I've done ride where I've been pottering along and thought wind was favourable and had a crack at a segment whilst I've been out. Who cares!

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Yes, that is wrong, flag it.

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
Dizeee said:
Sigh.
Welcome to our world

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2013
quotequote all

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
So you're saying strava says you climbed 850ft but Garmin says 1200?


okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
If flat then questionable however smile

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
z4chris99 said:
cav says fastest he's hit in a sprint is 78.

so I wouldn't think A kid on strava could match him
Like a GPS glitch if its a short segment, loads of those on Strava, agree with you that on anything close to flat, even -1% hitting 40 mph is out of the reach of most people, let alone 45 or so!

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Thursday 1st August 2013
quotequote all
Cryptic I know, but they end up in the challenges section - http://app.strava.com/challenges

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
Dizeee said:
Less convinced by strava now. Couple of friends of mine did it, and their actual time vs Garmin time was way out. Strava added 20 mins on to one ride. That's with no stops too.
It did not add 20 mins.

Either you're all on different autostop settings, or someone is doing something the others are not. Strava takes the data its given by the GPS. I've done countless TT's and Strava has always exactly mimicked what I had on the screen, with the exception of power sometimes as Strava uses a slightly different code to give its average, but its within a watt or two.

What you should all be doing, turn off autopause, turn off smart recording, IF you stop and you do not want that to effect your 'real' average then pause the activity on the garmin.

Its that simple, I can't see where all these issues you speak of can actually come from?

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Dizeee said:
I don't have issues, however the chap I with did as above. His does auto pause, but his true time was less than what strava recorded.
Apart from the top speed thing, I am fully of the opinion that its a "put rubbish in get rubbish out" system, i.e. as long as you know what you're doing with regards to your garmin settings you will not have many surprises when you upload to Strava, it may calculate some things ever so slightly out, but it will not add or take time from a ride, why would it? And how would it?

okgo

Original Poster:

38,151 posts

199 months

Monday 19th August 2013
quotequote all
Hate to say it but if you look back at the first posts you made on the subject that is what me, and everyone else told you.

I did a ride yesterday and I was slower up Whitedown lane than I was over a year ago, do I care? God no, I know why I do things at certain paces certain times etc etc, the real gratifying stuff is when you beat someone you've not beaten before in a TT, or win a road race in good company etc. Though I went slower up most of the hills yesterday than I normally do, the previous day I did a 25 mile TT @ over 29 mph, sure as hell I couldn't have done that a year ago!