£2,500 but do I go endurance or racy?
Discussion
Blimey I'd be wary about 11-32, presuming with 34 front ring, thats pretty small
I've got 12-30 cassette on one of my bikes and Ive never used the bottom two gears, even on some long climbs through winter that ramp up to 25%, its just such a low ratio that each pedal stroke generates such little forward motion! I can see why it might help heavier riders though.
As it has a lower end, the gaps in ratios between the gears are a PITA as well, I prefer the tightness of 11-25 especially over long distances.
What limited riding I did in the alps I found that the climbs didn't feel as brutal or "steep" as UKs worst ones, they just went on upto an hour or so rather than 5 minutes in this country! Hence why I didn't find I needed to go too low gearing wise
I've got 12-30 cassette on one of my bikes and Ive never used the bottom two gears, even on some long climbs through winter that ramp up to 25%, its just such a low ratio that each pedal stroke generates such little forward motion! I can see why it might help heavier riders though.
As it has a lower end, the gaps in ratios between the gears are a PITA as well, I prefer the tightness of 11-25 especially over long distances.
What limited riding I did in the alps I found that the climbs didn't feel as brutal or "steep" as UKs worst ones, they just went on upto an hour or so rather than 5 minutes in this country! Hence why I didn't find I needed to go too low gearing wise
could be a bit sketchy with different braking performance between front and rear, I use my front brake far more than my rear on the road though so perhaps it wouldnt be as bad as I think, running a cable front disc would be pretty easy though and they arent as woeful as people suggest if you fit organic pads.
TwistingMyMelon said:
Blimey I'd be wary about 11-32, presuming with 34 front ring, thats pretty small
I've got 12-30 cassette on one of my bikes and Ive never used the bottom two gears, even on some long climbs through winter that ramp up to 25%, its just such a low ratio that each pedal stroke generates such little forward motion! I can see why it might help heavier riders though.
As it has a lower end, the gaps in ratios between the gears are a PITA as well, I prefer the tightness of 11-25 especially over long distances.
What limited riding I did in the alps I found that the climbs didn't feel as brutal or "steep" as UKs worst ones, they just went on upto an hour or so rather than 5 minutes in this country! Hence why I didn't find I needed to go too low gearing wise
The point is it means you can keep spinning even on the steep stuff. Glandon, for example, is 10% for several KM; coming to it tired at the end of the day I was glad to be able to stay in bottom gear and keep the cadence high. There's no issue with 34-32 as a setup - I was using DA9070, but with an Ultegra 6870GS rear derailleur; a riding mate used mechanical Ultegra 6800, again with a GS.I've got 12-30 cassette on one of my bikes and Ive never used the bottom two gears, even on some long climbs through winter that ramp up to 25%, its just such a low ratio that each pedal stroke generates such little forward motion! I can see why it might help heavier riders though.
As it has a lower end, the gaps in ratios between the gears are a PITA as well, I prefer the tightness of 11-25 especially over long distances.
What limited riding I did in the alps I found that the climbs didn't feel as brutal or "steep" as UKs worst ones, they just went on upto an hour or so rather than 5 minutes in this country! Hence why I didn't find I needed to go too low gearing wise
If you're a 24-year-old 63kg climber (like one of the chaps I rode with last time out, who sailed up everything with 36/25 as his bottom gear) then fine, but at 6'1", 79kg and 45 years old, with knees trashed from years of skiing, I'll take the lowest gear I can reasonably fit.
Gruffy said:
11-32 would be ideal. I often spin-out on descents and really wish I had taller gears.
As it happens I'm renting an R3 in a couple of weeks to keep the miles coming while I'm in California. 3 days of that should make for a thorough test ride.
Where about are you going to be riding? Am there in a couple of weeks too with my bike.As it happens I'm renting an R3 in a couple of weeks to keep the miles coming while I'm in California. 3 days of that should make for a thorough test ride.
I went for a Madone over a Domane for audax. Doing a 400km (with 6500m of climbing) at the weekend. The steel audax bike will be staying in the shed.
You sure at 6'4, 80kg = race weight? I'm 6'3, and feel "tubby" at 73kg. Was 68kg this time last year. That felt good. I'm ~7% bf at that weight (DEXA). Lad I'm riding with at the weekend is <6% (admittedly Tanita). I'm riding around with an Emonda on my back.
You sure at 6'4, 80kg = race weight? I'm 6'3, and feel "tubby" at 73kg. Was 68kg this time last year. That felt good. I'm ~7% bf at that weight (DEXA). Lad I'm riding with at the weekend is <6% (admittedly Tanita). I'm riding around with an Emonda on my back.
When I say 'racing snake'; I'm at 11% BF at the moment, but my upper body still has some atrophy left to go as I've only cycled 3,000km so far. I'm trying to fight that but my weight is still coming down. I don't think I'll go below 78kg though. I've been as low as <5% before for other sports, but don't fancy that again at 35. I'm not planning to race (famous last words) so 10-12% BF will likely be as low as I can justify going on a long term basis. If I ever get serious then I may cut for the summer seasons.
I think I've ruled out the Synapse. Now I'm looking at more aggressive bikes and seeing how far £2.5k goes. Supersix or something from Canyon, perhaps. They look like phenomenal value. No disc options though.
I think I've ruled out the Synapse. Now I'm looking at more aggressive bikes and seeing how far £2.5k goes. Supersix or something from Canyon, perhaps. They look like phenomenal value. No disc options though.
thetrash said:
Gruffy said:
11-32 would be ideal. I often spin-out on descents and really wish I had taller gears.
As it happens I'm renting an R3 in a couple of weeks to keep the miles coming while I'm in California. 3 days of that should make for a thorough test ride.
Where about are you going to be riding? Am there in a couple of weeks too with my bike.As it happens I'm renting an R3 in a couple of weeks to keep the miles coming while I'm in California. 3 days of that should make for a thorough test ride.
75km, 1,448m crossing the mountains between the two valleys
http://www.strava.com/activities/188467371
The descent down into Calistoga was awesome, with a great surface and good radius corners for high speeds. Spring Mountain was a pig of a hill, especially climbing the steep side. The descent was lots of fun but some scruffy surfaces (and camouflaged by the dappled sunlight) gave my sphincter a workout too. The 20% hill back to our B&B was great for making sure you rinsed every ounce from your legs by the end of every ride.
125km, 1,456m riding the Pacific Coast Highway
http://www.strava.com/activities/189019971
I was hoping to beat Levi Leipheimer (our neighbour) and his pro chums on a worthy segment here but had to settle for 4th place, 10 seconds slower than Laurens Ten Dam. Obviously it goes without saying that LTD was riding at threshold when he set that time. PCH was nice but bloody windy.
So, having abandoned the idea of an endurance bike, I now find myself drawn to Canyon's goodies.
Ultimate CF SL 9.0 £1,999
Di2 is an option at £600, but I think I'll wait for n+1 for that (and discs, it seems).
Ultimate CF SLX 8.0 £2,599
Is the extra £600 paying for better wheels and a 150g weight saving over the SL 9.0 or am I missing something?
But, in true 'PH, screw the budget' style, I'm now looking longingly at this:
Aeroad SLX 7.0 £2,699
Same spec but in aero form and with Cosmic Carbone SLE. Seems like the best value of the three.
Opinions and thoughts from the masses?
Ultimate CF SL 9.0 £1,999
Di2 is an option at £600, but I think I'll wait for n+1 for that (and discs, it seems).
Ultimate CF SLX 8.0 £2,599
Is the extra £600 paying for better wheels and a 150g weight saving over the SL 9.0 or am I missing something?
But, in true 'PH, screw the budget' style, I'm now looking longingly at this:
Aeroad SLX 7.0 £2,699
Same spec but in aero form and with Cosmic Carbone SLE. Seems like the best value of the three.
Opinions and thoughts from the masses?
Edited by Gruffy on Tuesday 9th September 19:29
I keep looking at that Aeroad CF SLX too and im so tempted. Pretty sure Id have ordered one if I could see one in the flesh.
Whilst I cant do that my eyes getting drawn to the Giant Propel Advanced 0, which Ill at least be able to look at and ride first
http://www.giant-shoreham.co.uk/en-gb/bikes/model/...
Whilst I cant do that my eyes getting drawn to the Giant Propel Advanced 0, which Ill at least be able to look at and ride first
http://www.giant-shoreham.co.uk/en-gb/bikes/model/...
I was originally looking for a jack of all trades but saw my friend's logic in opting for something more focused. I do think discs are the way to go but as this will be a 'best' bike for dry weather it's not a huge trade-off. I definitely don't need an aero bike* but the lust factor is high and satisfying that will make riding even more enjoyable.
*unless Mrs Gruffy is reading this, in which case I'd like to point out that the Aeroad is an entry-level bike and really is the most economical choice
*unless Mrs Gruffy is reading this, in which case I'd like to point out that the Aeroad is an entry-level bike and really is the most economical choice
Gassing Station | Pedal Powered | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff