Everesting.

Author
Discussion

Gruffy

7,212 posts

260 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
It's no more perverse than a static bike. It's an arbitrary target but it's something I can use to add focus to my training as I'd like to build more climbing into my rides. It's not really that different from the Club du Cingles at Ventoux, only it can be tackled by anybody without travelling beyond their local hill.

richardxjr

7,561 posts

211 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
8x Alpe D'Huez is a lot more doable than 70x Ditchling tbh. It's mental either way of course.

walm

10,609 posts

203 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
richardxjr said:
8x Alpe D'Huez is a lot more doable than 70x Ditchling tbh. It's mental either way of course.
Absolutely. I am a terrible climber but when I was in the Alps I was amazed at the vertical distance you can cover just grinding it out in the granny gear on a constant gradient. It's all the soul crushing 20% patches that kill me.

Grandfondo

Original Poster:

12,241 posts

207 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Gruffy said:
It's no more perverse than a static bike. It's an arbitrary target but it's something I can use to add focus to my training as I'd like to build more climbing into my rides. It's not really that different from the Club du Cingles at Ventoux, only it can be tackled by anybody without travelling beyond their local hill.
Who rides a static bike for 20 hours though?

nammynake

2,590 posts

174 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
jamiebae said:
Those rules are crazy! Why on earth can't you repeat a loop rather than just riding up and down the same bit of road?
The challenge is arbitrary and therefore the 'rules' can be whatever they like! I think it's a genuine challenge for all riders, certainly something that requires mental as well as physical strength.

Some Gump

12,701 posts

187 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
LMAO. Some of you lot are daft. People are talking about 8 kilometers of "up" and you pick up on the repetiveness of it? It's 8 sodding thousand metres for gods sake, you'd have to be a mentalist.


[footnote]
("bigest" ride for me so far in my lifetime is 7,800 feet of climbing. The idea of doing over 21,000 feet of climbing is just obscene. [/footnote]

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Couple of guys from the club were all about this. They found a local hill which was around 5% average and worked out the amount of climbs. Last year when I felt stupid I went up and down that same hill (Aston) 10 times one evening then 15 times the next. It was the single most tedious thing I have ever ridden (inc 3hrs on the turbo). They planned to cover that 120m climb roughly 65 times or so, I said they wouldn't do it and guess what smile

Come Feb in Tenerife I am planning 4500m on a day ride. That'll be enough to do and maintain a 5-7 days out there. We averaged 2-3000m a day last trip and on the final Teide climb I was as close to quitting anything as I have ever been.

Gruffy

7,212 posts

260 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Grandfondo said:
Gruffy said:
It's no more perverse than a static bike. It's an arbitrary target but it's something I can use to add focus to my training as I'd like to build more climbing into my rides. It's not really that different from the Club du Cingles at Ventoux, only it can be tackled by anybody without travelling beyond their local hill.
Who rides a static bike for 20 hours though?
Nutters.

I love how stupid the concept is. Right up my street. "Because it's there", in the true spirit of Everest.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Gruffy said:
It's no more perverse than a static bike. It's an arbitrary target but it's something I can use to add focus to my training as I'd like to build more climbing into my rides. It's not really that different from the Club du Cingles at Ventoux, only it can be tackled by anybody without travelling beyond their local hill.
It is, it's much more boring. You see the same carrier bags, the same piece of dog st, every little change in surface, the drain cover that you have to go around, potholes, the same parked cars and the guy cutting his grass.....finishing the grass and then going off to the pub (probably).


Then it rains.

donfisher

793 posts

167 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Gruffy said:
It's not really that different from the Club du Cingles at Ventoux, only it can be tackled by anybody without travelling beyond their local hill.
I find the fact that something like the CdC is excluded rather odd. I like the idea of doing an Everest total climb on a single ride.

The stipulation that it has to be on a single ascent, over and over again should be something that is permitted if local conditions make it inconvenient to do it over the course of a route, not the main criteria IMHO.


Eddh

4,656 posts

193 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
pablo said:
would only be 51 ascents of Cheddar Gorge and only 41 ascents of Burrington Combe....
Doesn't really sound that bad... does it?

Gruffy

7,212 posts

260 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
donfisher said:
I find the fact that something like the CdC is excluded rather odd. I like the idea of doing an Everest total climb on a single ride.

The stipulation that it has to be on a single ascent, over and over again should be something that is permitted if local conditions make it inconvenient to do it over the course of a route, not the main criteria IMHO.
I wonder if the rules are an attempt to keep things manageable when it comes to the record-breaking, climb-claiming nature of the phenomenon. I think part of the appeal - childish as it is - is claiming a record for a given hill.

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

191 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Gruffy said:
donfisher said:
I find the fact that something like the CdC is excluded rather odd. I like the idea of doing an Everest total climb on a single ride.

The stipulation that it has to be on a single ascent, over and over again should be something that is permitted if local conditions make it inconvenient to do it over the course of a route, not the main criteria IMHO.
I wonder if the rules are an attempt to keep things manageable when it comes to the record-breaking, climb-claiming nature of the phenomenon. I think part of the appeal - childish as it is - is claiming a record for a given hill.
Absolutely. If you want to climb that distance for the challenge, but are not bothered about some pointless internet prize, then just get your bike and ride it!

Gruffy

7,212 posts

260 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Yup. I'll be tipping the hat to anybody laying down those kind of numbers, irrespective of any rules. Team PH Everest attempt? Anyone? Anyone?

Grandfondo

Original Poster:

12,241 posts

207 months

Sunday 23rd November 2014
quotequote all
14 times up the Bealach na Ba!

To be honest once was enough!!!

louiebaby

10,651 posts

192 months

Sunday 23rd November 2014
quotequote all
I'm planning one next summer. It'll be 25 loops for Marie Curie, and whilst I'll di them all, I'm trying to get people from work to join me for as many as they feel able. I'm also hoping for a caravan so I can have cooked food, change, and take st in relative comfort.

Don't think I'd manage it on my own though.

Johnny

9,652 posts

285 months

Monday 24th November 2014
quotequote all
Gruffy said:
Yup. I'll be tipping the hat to anybody laying down those kind of numbers, irrespective of any rules. Team PH Everest attempt? Anyone? Anyone?
Hmmm. Ok.