How much difference do a good set of wheels make?

How much difference do a good set of wheels make?

Author
Discussion

ED209

Original Poster:

5,746 posts

244 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
I currently have a defy composite with he standard giant wheels (pr-2 possibly) and after seeing all of these extremely expensive wheels on various bikes was wondering do these expensive wheels make a difference to the average cyclist?

Would it be worth spending a few quid to upgrade my wheels?

Magic919

14,126 posts

201 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
I put Dura Ace C50s on mine. I felt they were better, but then I would.

craigthecoupe

692 posts

204 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
in my opinion, nope.
i spent £300 on a set of handbuilt wheels to replace some stock aksiums. i know thats not a vast sum of money, but they came in under 1.4kg and i cant tell a bean of difference. i like them, and glad i bought them, especially as the builder is local, so should i snap a spoke etc, but i think it's placebo effect. best money i ever spent was on a training programme.

neil-935ql

1,083 posts

106 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
I upgraded to fulcrum racing 3 from base spec shimano , I defo think it's made a better faster ride they were just short of 300 pounds from wiggle , I would recommend a wheel upgrade

numtumfutunch

4,721 posts

138 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all

I spent the afternoon mechanicing for my 20 something mate who races properly and isnt rich

His race bike rolls on Zipp 404's with a 105 groupset

Zipp 404 = majorly spendy
105 groupset = Aldi nudging on Sainsbury, nowhere near Waitrose

Clearly the boy attaches more priority to wheels - and as an old fart Id broadly agree

Cheers




ED209

Original Poster:

5,746 posts

244 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
numtumfutunch said:
I spent the afternoon mechanicing for my 20 something mate who races properly and isnt rich

His race bike rolls on Zipp 404's with a 105 groupset

Zipp 404 = majorly spendy
105 groupset = Aldi nudging on Sainsbury, nowhere near Waitrose

Clearly the boy attaches more priority to wheels - and as an old fart Id broadly agree

Cheers
Lol my groups is tiagra so probably lidl.

Marcellus

7,118 posts

219 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
I think good hubs make more of a difference than just good wheels....... May have said that badly... I think in you put good hubs on ok wheels then you'd see an improvement!

okgo

38,001 posts

198 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
Aero wheels - look nice, but most people aren't saving many watts using them given most people are not riding quickly enough.

They are faster of course, but even on a roadbike decent riders probably rarely getting to the speeds where they begin to really help. On a time trial bike where you ride nearer 30mph (if you're any good) then obviously you're getting more benefit, but I couldn't tell the difference between Fulcrum 7's and Enve 6.7 riding at 18mph which I would imagine is what many would class as the average rider.

That all said, the wheels on that bike are probably st, so an upgrade of those and tyres will make the bike feel fairly different. But once you've got a £400 or so set of wheels on your bike the returns diminish quite quickly.

Magic919

14,126 posts

201 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
Might be worth looking for some standard Giant wheels from higher up the range. Plenty of cast offs from us fashion upgraders.

Pachydermus

974 posts

112 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
The giant wheels come in around 1900g. There's plenty of sub £500 rims that will knock 400g off that and therefore make a reasonable difference in performance. Of course the big question is what are you trying to achieve with your riding?

mikecassie

609 posts

159 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
If you go towards aero wheels then you will feel a difference. In sidewinds...

You might see an improvement in a particular loop time, segment time but I reckon wind direction etc at the time will make a bigger influence and affect the times.

As with everything, it depends on what you want. If it's looks then get some deeper wheels fitted. If you're a nervy descender as I am but getting better, I'd lay off them and stay to shallow wheels TBH.

E65Ross

35,051 posts

212 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
okgo said:
Aero wheels - look nice, but most people aren't saving many watts using them given most people are not riding quickly enough.

They are faster of course, but even on a roadbike decent riders probably rarely getting to the speeds where they begin to really help. On a time trial bike where you ride nearer 30mph (if you're any good) then obviously you're getting more benefit, but I couldn't tell the difference between Fulcrum 7's and Enve 6.7 riding at 18mph which I would imagine is what many would class as the average rider.

That all said, the wheels on that bike are probably st, so an upgrade of those and tyres will make the bike feel fairly different. But once you've got a £400 or so set of wheels on your bike the returns diminish quite quickly.
This.

Having said that, I do think there is something to be said for changing the wheels. I have noticed a difference between my Fulcrum 7's and my Shimano RS80 wheels. Not just in feel (they do feel far more agile and ready to turn corners, and also seemingly have a better braking surface so they sotp faster), but I also seem to average that little bit quicker on them for a given average power output.

I think, for the money, going from st tyres to very good tyres is worth more....although both is better smile

ED209

Original Poster:

5,746 posts

244 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
mikecassie said:
If you go towards aero wheels then you will feel a difference. In sidewinds...

You might see an improvement in a particular loop time, segment time but I reckon wind direction etc at the time will make a bigger influence and affect the times.

As with everything, it depends on what you want. If it's looks then get some deeper wheels fitted. If you're a nervy descender as I am but getting better, I'd lay off them and stay to shallow wheels TBH.
Im the worlds worst descender! Zero bottle.

My wife is looking to do an ironman event next year and I'm also considering trying one. I am just concerned I'm not fast enough on the bike. I know training is the answer but anything else thats reasonably priced and might assist in making me a little quicker is worth a look.

HardtopManual

2,421 posts

166 months

Sunday 24th July 2016
quotequote all
I train on Zonda clinchers and race on Bora tubs. There is a world of difference between the two wheelsets. The Boras are just plain faster in any situation, even a wet descent where you might think the poorer braking of the carbon rim would give the Zondas an advantage.

Only you can answer whether a given performance difference is worth the outlay though.

JEA1K

2,504 posts

223 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
The original question really depends on who you are and what you do. Aero wheels won't be a benefit unless you're riding at higher speeds ... probably 20mph +, so I guess the extra weight at lower speeds won't actually be of any benefit. A decent set of lighter wheels for the recreational rider travelling at 16 - 18 mph will probably be a better investment. 'Decent' doesn't mean spending a fortune either ... spending £2.5k on a set of Enve 6.7's if you're just pootling around is daft, although I'm sure there are plenty that do.

Our Tuesday chaingang ride averages 23/24 mph for around a lumpy 50 miles with the final 12 mile section between 28/30 mph, and in all honesty, I can only really tell the difference at those higher speeds.

upsidedownmark

2,120 posts

135 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
Sorry, but this 'aero isn't a benefit unless you're fast' stuff is utter bullst. If you reduce your cda by (say) a couple of percent, you go faster, end of. There is no magic speed at which aero switches on. The faster rider will see a bigger reduction in their drag number, but (over a given distance/course) the slower rider gets a smaller reduction for more time. Net result tends to be that the SLOWER rider actually has more to gain..

Decent write up here: http://alex-cycle.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/aero-for-...

As to wheels, it depends what you're comparing to. Most stock wheelsets have terrible hubs with bearings that deteriorate quickly. Aero is nice, but IMHO the biggest improvement in a new set is having a half decent, nicely rolling hub.

E65Ross

35,051 posts

212 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
I'm running RS80 C24's on mine, I don't think I'll upgrade them, I'll end up buying a new bike instead (naturally.....as I want DI2) and I'd be torn between Dura Ace C35's or C50's really....

I tend to ride quite rolling terrain, but the C50's aren't exactly a heavy wheel....

okgo

38,001 posts

198 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
Interesting to read what Alex mentions on there. Though I suppose what I was getting at is the faster rider gets a more obvious increase in speed. Yes, the same percentage for both riders, but as they say x% of fk all is fk all.

Dannbodge

2,164 posts

121 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
I upgraded my wheels from Alexrims that came standard on my Cube to Fulcrum Quattros.

The difference in feel and speed was incredible once changed, completely changed the feel of the bike.

TSCfree

1,681 posts

231 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
Depends what the 'average cyclist' is up to...

Don't try and justify it, buy what you like.

I quite fancy a set of Campag Ones for no other reason that they look great, Yes it may knock 5 secs of my 10TT,but REALLY it's not enough justify spunking 1K on wheels is it!