Some cyclists don't help themselves, do they!

Some cyclists don't help themselves, do they!

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 27th October 2016
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
Don't ever come to Cambridge. You'll be overcome by apoplectic rage.
I did. I was.

m444ttb

3,160 posts

229 months

Thursday 27th October 2016
quotequote all
I drive to work on a Thursday and see the same guy in pretty much the same spot every week. By see I mean as he emerges from the darkness dressed in black on a dark bike without so much as a reflector. It pisses me off because it's people like him that make people on here and on facebook start write sentences implying all cyclists are doing this. See far more driving with at best side lights.

Crippo

1,186 posts

220 months

Thursday 27th October 2016
quotequote all
I sell Cycle Lights, not all lights are that great. Some which seem really bright in the shop disappear into nothing when they have to fight for attention against a wet windscreen and significantly brighter lights on vehicles. The trouble is that many riders think that as they have ticked the lights box, they dont need to worry about how they ride or what they are wearing. My advice is buy some decent lights 20 lumen rear with a 200 lumen front as a minimum, get some reflectivity, preferably ankle bands and dont ride like everyone can see you. Assume that they havent.

Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Friday 28th October 2016
quotequote all
Crippo said:
I sell Cycle Lights, not all lights are that great. Some which seem really bright in the shop disappear into nothing when they have to fight for attention against a wet windscreen and significantly brighter lights on vehicles. The trouble is that many riders think that as they have ticked the lights box, they dont need to worry about how they ride or what they are wearing. My advice is buy some decent lights 20 lumen rear with a 200 lumen front as a minimum, get some reflectivity, preferably ankle bands and dont ride like everyone can see you. Assume that they havent.
Excellent comments, just what I as a car driver want to hear. To see any cyclist in the dark, from behind glass, with oncoming cars headlights creating shadows etc is bad enough (let alone if it's raining, wipers etc) - but to then realise that a cyclist has no/little lights showing is just utterly ridiculous. I'm sure the worst offenders on bikes can't possibly also be car drivers or they would have better understood the problems.

jesusbuiltmycar

4,537 posts

254 months

Friday 28th October 2016
quotequote all
Saw a stealth ninja cyclist last night, dressed in black on a bike with no lights or reflectors riding up the busy dual carriageway into Bournemouth. rolleyes

Kell

1,708 posts

208 months

Friday 28th October 2016
quotequote all
I blame Rapha.


ecsrobin

17,118 posts

165 months

Friday 28th October 2016
quotequote all
Crippo said:
I sell Cycle Lights, not all lights are that great. Some which seem really bright in the shop disappear into nothing when they have to fight for attention against a wet windscreen and significantly brighter lights on vehicles. The trouble is that many riders think that as they have ticked the lights box, they dont need to worry about how they ride or what they are wearing. My advice is buy some decent lights 20 lumen rear with a 200 lumen front as a minimum, get some reflectivity, preferably ankle bands and dont ride like everyone can see you. Assume that they havent.
Portsmouth is awful for the no lights and helmet brigade, however the other day I saw a ninja who has a single red LED on the back of his bike running around 1 lumen so technically within the law (although no front light or reflectors) the should really make it a legal requirement for shops to sell a minimum level light, however it's making people use them in the first place.

AC43

11,486 posts

208 months

Friday 28th October 2016
quotequote all
55palfers said:
French, cyclist, banker - Full house.
LOL

bakerstreet

4,763 posts

165 months

Friday 28th October 2016
quotequote all
Kell said:
I blame Rapha.
To be fair to Rapha, they have the sytylished whiote band on the arm of their jerseys wink

Like everyone else, I get wond up by people who ride at night with no lights or no reflective clothing.

In London you also see Cyclists with lights pointing at the ground, but they struggled attaching the light properly frown

Most of the time, I keep quiet, but when I was forced to move out of the way with my dog because cyclist was cycling in all black on the pavement in the dark and no lights, I had a slight sense of humor failure.

paranoid airbag

2,679 posts

159 months

Friday 28th October 2016
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
Don't ever come to Cambridge. You'll be overcome by apoplectic rage.
So why's it so safe in comparison to the rest of the UK?

It's almost like all the stuff you care about, on a population level, is achieving fk all.

Andy JB

1,319 posts

219 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
Robertj21a said:
troc said:
Ditto. Dynamo and no off switch.
As a car driver I just wish more cyclists used lights. I don't want to injure anybody, and I try very hard to drive carefully, but a cyclist with no lights, in the dark, is simply stupid.
Some Bicycle users (not cyclists) don't use lights = bad/stupid/inconsiderate or 'idiot' as someone succinctly put -agreed. Most if not all Cyclists do use lights, and i'm amazed when out riding the number of 'drivers' read 'car users' who take an aggressive approach to my lights - you can't win.

Personally i don't take the christmas tree approach, however, the last time I was on a mid week country ride along lanes with my 13 year old lad, one car user took offence to being able to see us as the light was too bright for his eyes and pulled over to remonstrate with him in an aggressive way, obviously this was less than his car lights but suitable for unlit dark lanes. So please let us know what light is acceptable to you, but i'm afraid you can't have it both ways?

Dr Murdoch

3,444 posts

135 months

Thursday 3rd November 2016
quotequote all
The back lights are tricky, as you (the rider) can't see them! The only way I can see if they are ok, is to get the other half to ride in front of you whilst you drive behind. Thats not practical, nor likely.

Otherwise, its bolt on and virtually hope for the best, or am I missing something?

troc

3,760 posts

175 months

Thursday 3rd November 2016
quotequote all
Dr Murdoch said:
The back lights are tricky, as you (the rider) can't see them! The only way I can see if they are ok, is to get the other half to ride in front of you whilst you drive behind. Thats not practical, nor likely.

Otherwise, its bolt on and virtually hope for the best, or am I missing something?
Depends on the lights. My rear lights have a wide enough spread that I can see if they are working by glancing behind me.

Dr Murdoch

3,444 posts

135 months

Thursday 3rd November 2016
quotequote all
troc said:
Depends on the lights. My rear lights have a wide enough spread that I can see if they are working by glancing behind me.
Good point

Although my helmet mounted rear light might be tricky....

..I'll look like a dog chasing its tail biglaugh




troc

3,760 posts

175 months

Thursday 3rd November 2016
quotequote all
Dr Murdoch said:
Good point
Although my helmet mounted rear light might be tricky....
..I'll look like a dog chasing its tail biglaugh
You aren't turning your head fast enough smile

Steve vRS

4,845 posts

241 months

Thursday 3rd November 2016
quotequote all
I commute with 3 rear lights so I have 2 online spares should 1 stop working or fall off as has happened on more than 1 occasion.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Friday 4th November 2016
quotequote all
Big Rod said:
tuffer said:
I use lights all year, day and night.
Me too.
Not me. On a bright sunny day when I'm riding on moorland roads there really is no point. It's not like they make a difference to how the sheep behave biggrin

Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Saturday 5th November 2016
quotequote all
Andy JB said:
Some Bicycle users (not cyclists) don't use lights = bad/stupid/inconsiderate or 'idiot' as someone succinctly put -agreed. Most if not all Cyclists do use lights, and i'm amazed when out riding the number of 'drivers' read 'car users' who take an aggressive approach to my lights - you can't win.

Personally i don't take the christmas tree approach, however, the last time I was on a mid week country ride along lanes with my 13 year old lad, one car user took offence to being able to see us as the light was too bright for his eyes and pulled over to remonstrate with him in an aggressive way, obviously this was less than his car lights but suitable for unlit dark lanes. So please let us know what light is acceptable to you, but i'm afraid you can't have it both ways?
I've no idea about modern-day lights on bikes but there are some very bright front lights on them in recent times, some pulsating. They're certainly much better than nothing, but do seem excessively bright when it's a dark country road. Not sure there's an easy answer to that one.

SteveSteveson

3,209 posts

163 months

Saturday 5th November 2016
quotequote all
What I don't understand is how people can be so angry towards bikes with no lights yet not cars at all about the number of cars with defective lights. It's just as bad on unlit roads to not be able to see half a car coming towards you. Suddenly finding out what you thought was a motorbike in the middle of the lane was in fact the a car is not nice.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Saturday 5th November 2016
quotequote all
SteveSteveson said:
What I don't understand is how people can be so angry towards bikes...
I do. It's a classic "Them and us" mentality.