All mountain tyres - recommendations please!

All mountain tyres - recommendations please!

Author
Discussion

carter711

Original Poster:

1,849 posts

198 months

Wednesday 10th November 2010
quotequote all
Hi,

I'm in the market for some new tyres.
I want a 2.3 on the front and a 2.1 on the back and I want them weigh under 1000g's each.

I am currently thinking of a Panaracer Fire XC folding 2.1 on the rear and a Maxxis Minion 2.3 on the front.
Will the Maxxis feel too heavy?

I've had continental vertical pros in the past and wasn't overly impressed with them, although they are light and have good volume.

I ride all over the woods but do have a dh bias having done a few races and love the extra confidence you get from running high volume tyres, I just don't want to be so heavy that it kills me on the climbs!


If you've got any help or recommendations on the subject I'm all ears.

Cheers!



carter711

Original Poster:

1,849 posts

198 months

Wednesday 10th November 2010
quotequote all
Anyonez?

Mike_CTR

2,505 posts

201 months

Wednesday 10th November 2010
quotequote all
carter711 said:
Hi,

I'm in the market for some new tyres.
I want a 2.3 on the front and a 2.1 on the back and I want them weigh under 1000g's each.

I am currently thinking of a Panaracer Fire XC folding 2.1 on the rear and a Maxxis Minion 2.3 on the front.
Will the Maxxis feel too heavy?

I've had continental vertical pros in the past and wasn't overly impressed with them, although they are light and have good volume.

I ride all over the woods but do have a dh bias having done a few races and love the extra confidence you get from running high volume tyres, I just don't want to be so heavy that it kills me on the climbs!


If you've got any help or recommendations on the subject I'm all ears.

Cheers!
In my experience the Maxxis do tend to be quite heavy, I ride with Panaracers front and rear at the moment, to be honest though, can the weight difference between a 2.1 and 2.3 on the front really be that bad?

Gnarlybluesurf

263 posts

176 months

Wednesday 10th November 2010
quotequote all
I asked a similar question and ended up with some panaracers which i love... (panaracer rampage 2.1 PR on the back and 2.3 SC on the front as the PR is meant to be a slightly harder wearing compound).. now I "rampage" all over the mountain... or at least my tyres do... in name...

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Raven Flyer

1,642 posts

224 months

Wednesday 10th November 2010
quotequote all
Under a kilo each? Jeez, I look for tyres that weigh half that.

tybalt

1,100 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2010
quotequote all
Maxxis folding 2.35 high rollers are 690g each. They are pretty light.

snotrag

14,463 posts

211 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
Some of the Maxxis tyres are really not too shabby on the weight front actually.

My Personal favourite is the AdVantage, bit more up to date than the High rollers. 2.25 is plenty big enough (the 2.4's are waaay to big to do miles on) and note that the sizing is different between old generation maxxis and new generation Maxxis.


if you look on www.justridingalong.com they have some really good info on all the maxxis range including all the weights, as measured by them, not 'claimed weights'.

P-Jay

10,566 posts

191 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
Running a 2.3 Highroller Supertackie front (dual ply) front and 2.25 ADvantage rear, works wonders at the trail centres year-round, but my bike is set-up for descending rather than climbing.

carter711

Original Poster:

1,849 posts

198 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
I've been doing some more research and have found that wtb moto raptors 2.24 are about 600g and get some good reviews. That's almost as light as fire xc's and on paper at least they are bigger.

Has anyone used them before?

Also the wtb mutano raptor race 2.4 is under 600g but the tread doesn't look too confidence inspiring.


The holy rollers look like a good choice at the mo, however, on the weight weenies site they are listed at over 1kg per tyre?!

a11y_m

1,861 posts

222 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Running a 2.3 Highroller Supertackie front (dual ply) front and 2.25 ADvantage rear, works wonders at the trail centres year-round, but my bike is set-up for descending rather than climbing.
Similar to me...

On my "all-mountain" bike I run:
f: Maxxis High Roller 2.35" single-ply 60a
r: Maxxis ADvantage 2.25"

Great combo for trail centres and not-too-wet regular trails, but the ADvantage isn't great in mud or contouring across wet grass (as I know from experience).

Beyond Rational

3,524 posts

215 months

Saturday 13th November 2010
quotequote all
OP, the Maxxis ADvantage 2.1 sounds like it would be a good fit for your rear tyre requirements.

Edited by Beyond Rational on Saturday 13th November 11:11

carter711

Original Poster:

1,849 posts

198 months

Saturday 13th November 2010
quotequote all
Thanks alot for the advice everyone! It's been a real help.

I've ummed and arred over many tyres in the past few days, the holy roller was a serious contender as was the minnion, but the ADvantage is the one I've decided to go with as it looks like it rolls really well, it is light, I can have a 2.4 on the front at as the weight penalty is minimal compared to some of the others, and to top it off the pricing is just right I'd say.

Thanks again to everyone that contributed, once I've ridden them a few times i'll re visit the thread and post my findings.

phil-sti

2,679 posts

179 months

Saturday 13th November 2010
quotequote all
conti Baron?

carter711

Original Poster:

1,849 posts

198 months

Wednesday 12th January 2011
quotequote all
Well, I've had the Advantages on my bike for a couple of months now but due to the crappy weather I've only been able to go on 3 rides.

The tyres grip exceptionly well, they roll well and are very light so acceleration/braking is very good.

They do have a major weakness though, and that is the sidewall. To keep the weight down Maxxis have shaved everylast gram from the sidewalls which makes them very thin and weak, so weak that after only the 3rd ride with them I discovered a tear in the sidewall frown

This has never happened to me before in 13 years of mountainbiking.

I'm not heavy on my bikes and have only been doing bridleway type rides since running these tyres so I'm disappointed. I've repaired the sidewall with a puncture repair patch on both sides of the tyre where the tear is, I hope it lasts as they are practically brand new!

So incase you are thinking of getting these tyres, I'd first consider getting a slightly heavier alternative with stronger sidewalls. Potentially throwing £25 down the drain isn't much fun!

snotrag

14,463 posts

211 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
Thats interesiting - which size and which carcass/version where they?
As I've been running them, sans tubes, for ages now, pinging off rocks in the peak district and all sorts, one of the main reasons I like them is they have taken abuse!?

Just goes to show, 'your mileage may vary' is always true!

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
conti speed kings and some bravery pills!...

I like fire xc pros but the knobblies on the side are quite soft and tend to wash out rather than dig in. i guess it depends on the conditions and the surface. there is no win-all solution just a lot of compromises.

carter711

Original Poster:

1,849 posts

198 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
I've got a 2.4 on the front and a 2.25 on the rear, it's the rear one that's torn.
The repair I've done looks as ugly as sin but I'm hoping it'll mean I can use them over summer.

I think if the rear tears again I'll move the 2.4 to the back and get a minion on the front.

Edited to add it's the folding bead I have.



Edited by carter711 on Thursday 13th January 10:14

Gooby

9,268 posts

234 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
Normal or UST?

anniesdad

14,589 posts

238 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
I'm running UST Nobby Nics front and rear and whilst they are quite soft compound and wear reasonably quickly (no skidding on tarmac allowed hehe ) they are a great all rounder. The UST's are expensive but there was a BOGOF deal for the normal Tyres recently on the on-one site. A word of warning though the UST ones are a bh to get on a 5.1D Swiss rim. I've recently bought some Stans NO Tubes ZTR Flow Hoops though and they went on beautifully on these. So whilst they don't have the outright grip of a Minion up front as a fast rolling all rounder I've found them hard to beat.