Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1 2 3 4
6 7
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

Upatdawn

1,073 posts

17 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
what is the difference (in feet/yards) at the top end between (say) a 6.50 car and a 7.50 car that start together on a non-handicapped tree/green?

TheMighty

541 posts

80 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
That would depend on the acceleration profile of the given cars, as the distance between the two will be determined by the speed of the second car over the period between the point the first car crosses the line and it itself crossing the finish line (a second later), hence why close finishes are often given as distances but virtually always stated as approximate due to the fact that they are calculated using the average speed over the last 66ft of track ie: the given terminal speed. In every case where the cars are still under power through the finish line the true distance is closer than that given. The error due to change in speed over time (acceleration) becomes greater as the elapsed time difference increases between the cars and as such it would be a pretty much worthless calculation when there is a second between the cars if you were to just use the terminal speed.

Edited by TheMighty on Saturday 21st July 19:08

Turbobird1

329 posts

17 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
a 7.5 super mod car runs 6.2 at 1000 ft approx so a 6 20 car it would be 350 feet approx

id guess somewhere between 250 and 300 ft....pure guess with nothing exept 1000 ft ets
to base the guess on.... wheres Crikey when you need him wink

crikey

1,497 posts

80 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
Evenin' smile

To paraphrase Mighty, there's a shedload of variables

I'll have a look when I'm on a pc and come up with a number that'll be there or thereabouts.

Edited by crikey on Sunday 22 July 21:05

Upatdawn

1,073 posts

17 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd July 2012 quote quote all
so....(thinking outside the box)

why not let the entrants in this "new class" (say 6.50 - 7.50 cars) all start on the "pro" tree with no handicap, the finish line being variable (say in 20ft sections) and the winner is the one who is first to "their" finish line, sort of handicapping from the other end?

i.e. a 6.50 car would have a 1320ft lane and a 7.50 car would have (say) a 1000ft lane..(examples only)

sounds daft but so did a round earth at one time, and helicopters (and im still unsure about them...)

best lock the doors now before men in white coats arive
Advertisement

Barry B

493 posts

80 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd July 2012 quote quote all
I'm not an expert but if the lanes were different lengths, wouldn't you need two seperate timing systems one for each lane ?

Turbobird1

329 posts

17 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd July 2012 quote quote all
timing lights every 20ft... idea

crikey

1,497 posts

80 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd July 2012 quote quote all
Barry B said:
I'm not an expert but if the lanes were different lengths, wouldn't you need two seperate timing systems one for each lane ?
Not neccesarily Barry. The TSI system can set the finish line at 1320, 1000 or 660 ft so it would probably only take a software tweak to be able to set a different finish line in each lane.

That said, that is without doubt the most monumentally stupid idea ever.

Upatdawn

1,073 posts

17 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd July 2012 quote quote all
oh well....




crikey

1,497 posts

80 months

[news] 
Monday 23rd July 2012 quote quote all
Turbobird1 said:
a 7.5 super mod car runs 6.2 at 1000 ft approx so a 6 20 car it would be 350 feet approx

id guess somewhere between 250 and 300 ft....pure guess with nothing exept 1000 ft ets
to base the guess on.... wheres Crikey when you need him wink
Who needs me to work it out wink

Using a bunch or runs between 6.4 and 6.6, and a bunch between 7.4 and 7.6, average speeds are 181.24 and 212.26 respectively.

A 1 second difference at the finish line would result in a MOV of 288.56ft.

As above though that's very much ish.

Turbobird1

329 posts

17 months

[news] 
Monday 23rd July 2012 quote quote all
lol just a lucky guess based on some faulty facts for a moment there i thought a 1/4 mile was 1350 ft even though i knew deep down its 1320........

Upatdawn

1,073 posts

17 months

[news] 
Monday 23rd July 2012 quote quote all
crikey said:
That said, that is without doubt the most monumentally stupid idea ever.
T'is in the bin!

crikey

1,497 posts

80 months

[news] 
Monday 23rd July 2012 quote quote all
Upatdawn said:
T'is in the bin!
Make sure the lid is on tight. That wasn't so much thinking outside the box as thinking inside the padded cell smile

crikey

1,497 posts

80 months

[news] 
Monday 23rd July 2012 quote quote all
Turbobird1 said:
lol just a lucky guess based on some faulty facts for a moment there i thought a 1/4 mile was 1350 ft even though i knew deep down its 1320........
Lol !

That's ok though, most people think the finish line is where the gantry is.....

Upatdawn

1,073 posts

17 months

[news] 
Tuesday 24th July 2012 quote quote all
crikey said:
Make sure the lid is on tight. That wasn't so much thinking outside the box as thinking inside the padded cell smile
All great thinkers have been made fun of......as if I worry! ha!



Upatdawn

1,073 posts

17 months

[news] 
Tuesday 24th July 2012 quote quote all
Turbobird1 said:

ok so what about a nostalgia comp motorcycle class
wheres all the home built blown triunphs and nortons of yesteryear, the real back garden shed engineering that was the backbone of all british drag racing was no where more evident than in the comp bike fields of the 70s and 80s

id pay good money to see that show.....
would you pay 2012 gate prices tho?...lol

PhilSweeney

111 posts

58 months

[news] 
Wednesday 25th July 2012 quote quote all
As good as it sounds I'm not sure there's a "need" for the class. There are some 7 sec cars out there that don't want to run brackets and thats understandable, but equally they probably won't be happy getting their arse kicked by a 6 second car either. What you want is a regular turnout of 7 sec cars, that survives without spoliers. That way the championship winner will be the quickest car, who beat all comers by turning out at every event.

For me, if a class like this went ahead, I'd have it

- 7.0 -8.49 bracket,pro tree
- Dragsters, Altereds, Doorslammers
- Breakouts permitted in qualifying, break-out delta added to ET as Luke said
- Must run quicker than 8.49 in qualifying to make eliminations ladder.
- Breakout in eliminations is an automatic loss.
- A-fuel allowed, no blown nitro, pump restictions apply
- No screw blowers
- MSA tagged
- Limit of 598cu in naturally aspirated
- Limit of 498in in blown
- No staging for points, bye runs must be run under 8.49
- First alternate rule applies


SpencerTramm

62 posts

77 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th July 2012 quote quote all
PhilSweeney said:
For me, if a class like this went ahead, I'd have it

- 7.0 -8.49 bracket,pro tree
- Dragsters, Altereds, Doorslammers
- Breakouts permitted in qualifying, break-out delta added to ET as Luke said
- Must run quicker than 8.49 in qualifying to make eliminations ladder.
- Breakout in eliminations is an automatic loss.
- A-fuel allowed, no blown nitro, pump restictions apply
- No screw blowers
- MSA tagged
- Limit of 598cu in naturally aspirated
- Limit of 498in in blown
- No staging for points, bye runs must be run under 8.49
- First alternate rule applies
Does your car fit these regulations Phil?

Turbobird1

329 posts

17 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th July 2012 quote quote all
A fuel in a sportsman class????...................i rest my case

dont know

56 posts

65 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th July 2012 quote quote all
Hmm someone just does not understand how dangerous an A fueler is.
1 2 3 4
6 7
Reply to Topic